Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:55 19 Apr 2025
 
- Race Across the World winner on 'authentic travel' and how to do it
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:50 Liskeard to Looe
Additional 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
14:22 Looe to Liskeard
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
11:24 Exmouth to Paignton
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:18 Paignton to Exmouth
14:14 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 13:00:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Driver to guard buzzer on HSTs  (Read 18666 times)
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: June 09, 2010, 03:27:44 »

The six beeps ([guard] "ding ding", [driver] "ding ding", [guard] "ding ding") was peculiar to FGW (First Great Western) high-speed services as far as I'm aware. It certainly isn't the case on the West DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) fleet and I don't think it was used by any other TOC (Train Operating Company). Since time immemorial the rightaway (RA) signal on stock equipped with a bell or buzzer has been simply "two" from guard to driver, who acknowledges with another two, so in that respect the "new" way is actually the traditional one. It was suggested to me by someone on the inside that FGW adopted the additional repetition of the RA signal by the guard following a couple of incidents in which drivers had started trains without permission, as an additional safeguard. Not sure how credible my source is on that one though!

Not sure when the change occurred as I was sitting in coach A of a Carmarthen service a few weeks ago when I was back in the UK (United Kingdom) and didn't notice that anything had changed.

Incidentally, guards still all carry green flags (albeit mostly without sticks these days) for use in the event of a buzzer failure.

As a further aside, there is a straight six-beeps signal meaning "draw up" (usually referring to starting the train but only pulling up to a signal that's still at danger) although I don't know whether that is still used.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2010, 03:43:49 by inspector_blakey » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: June 09, 2010, 12:45:09 »

Just to concur with Blakey's post and add that there were wiring problems with the Driver<>Guard system which sometimes led to spurious beeps being heard by the driver, which led to at least one incident with a train leaving with doors open.  The extra two from the Guard was a solution to ensure that it wouldn't happen again.  Following the re-wiring of the fleet and installation of more modern handsets it's felt that this extra safeguard is no longer necessary, so it's back to the industry standard 2 and 2.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
qwerty
Full Member
***
Posts: 74


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: June 09, 2010, 13:50:12 »

Just to concur with Blakey's post and add that there were wiring problems with the Driver<>Guard system which sometimes led to spurious beeps being heard by the driver, which led to at least one incident with a train leaving with doors open.  The extra two from the Guard was a solution to ensure that it wouldn't happen again.  Following the re-wiring of the fleet and installation of more modern handsets it's felt that this extra safeguard is no longer necessary, so it's back to the industry standard 2 and 2.

 Change being sold to staff as bringing HSS (High Speed Services) into line with West and LTV (London [and] Thames Valley)
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: June 09, 2010, 16:11:25 »

Just to concur with Blakey's post and add that there were wiring problems with the Driver<>Guard system which sometimes led to spurious beeps being heard by the driver, which led to at least one incident with a train leaving with doors open.  The extra two from the Guard was a solution to ensure that it wouldn't happen again.  Following the re-wiring of the fleet and installation of more modern handsets it's felt that this extra safeguard is no longer necessary, so it's back to the industry standard 2 and 2.

Wasn't long ago I was on a set with odd beeps on the buzzer to be heard in the TGS. Cue emergency brake application blocking station approach to Paddington; good job it was 6am. Problem persisted throughout journey however beeps were ignored.
Logged
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: June 09, 2010, 19:51:44 »

The change was made because of a couple of incidents where trains moved off with doors open as a result of misunderstanding buzzer codes. The code for the driver/guard asking to talk to each other is 3-3. So the guard gives 3-3, but the driver after the first 2 thinks its the right away and buzzes two back (whilst the guard is in the middle of his 3-3), and then hears the last 2 of the 3-3 and thinks that the guard is just acknowledging his 2, and off he goes.

So, with the cables much improved, time to go back to the standard method of 2 from the guard, 2 from the driver.
Logged
Cornish Traveller
Full Member
***
Posts: 62


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: June 09, 2010, 23:05:45 »

 Grin NXEA (National Express East Anglia) use 2-2-2 on hauled stock to avoid spurious beeps being accepted as guard - driver in error !
Logged
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: June 10, 2010, 18:27:26 »


As a further aside, there is a straight six-beeps signal meaning "draw up" (usually referring to starting the train but only pulling up to a signal that's still at danger) although I don't know whether that is still used.

This is still in use for places like Dawlish Warren and departing Crediton towards Exeter.
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: June 10, 2010, 19:00:45 »

And indeed anywhere there's a signal at danger far enough from the end of the platform for it to be deemed worthwhile drawing up to.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19550



View Profile Email
« Reply #38 on: June 10, 2010, 19:49:45 »

We had a similar discussion about buzzer codes, on HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) in particular, some time ago: purely for completeness and continuity, I'm rather inclined to merge these topics - provided nobody objects?

Chris.



Edit note: Topics now merged. Chris.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2010, 18:27:57 by chris from nailsea » Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #39 on: June 11, 2010, 02:30:14 »

A random thought popped into my head earlier on when I was in the gym with nothing better to think about... Is use of the buzzer recorded by the "OTMR (On Train Monitoring Recorder)" on-board data recorders where fitted?

Oh, and no objections to merging from me!
Logged
gaf71
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 305


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: June 11, 2010, 11:39:28 »

A random thought popped into my head earlier on when I was in the gym with nothing better to think about... Is use of the buzzer recorded by the "OTMR (On Train Monitoring Recorder)" on-board data recorders where fitted?

Oh, and no objections to merging from me!
Yes it is.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: June 11, 2010, 12:41:50 »

I think it depends on the type of train.  I'm pretty sure on a Turbo it isn't.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #42 on: June 11, 2010, 18:34:08 »

A random thought popped into my head earlier on when I was in the gym with nothing better to think about... Is use of the buzzer recorded by the "OTMR (On Train Monitoring Recorder)" on-board data recorders where fitted?

Oh, and no objections to merging from me!
Yes it is.
On the 14x & 15x it records the sounding of the buzzer (energisation of the buzzer train line). It does not record where on the train the buzzer train line circuit was energised.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
chrisoates
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 286


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: April 10, 2012, 22:41:28 »

So can you give 2 at Dawlish Warren if the signal at the end of the loop is red for another train to pass on the up main?

Was held at Dawlish Warren today for a passing HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) - as soon as it had passed Guard gave 6 and the Driver replied 6.

Rather than just drawing forward we carried on as the signal must have cleared. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page