The SprinterMeister
|
|
« Reply #15 on: August 24, 2008, 09:21:02 » |
|
The HSTs▸ are owned by First Group as opposed to First Great Western, as a strategic investment AFAIK▸ . The 143s are a bit cheap so the DfT» /SRA» needn't get involved on that one.
IIRC▸ , the 143's were owned by Nat/Ex and were sold on as part of the franchise. They had been bought from BR▸ by one of the Welsh Councils some years ago.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Trundling gently round the SW
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #16 on: August 24, 2008, 12:33:48 » |
|
Thanks for all the replies.
To sum up FGW▸ may get some 150s sometime presumably for Bristol and the West.
Thames Valley will have to suffer until Crossrail.
What a way to run a railway!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 24, 2008, 23:11:49 » |
|
dont quote me on this but more that one person has said to me that 143's for the exeter area are a possibility
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smithy
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2008, 14:59:03 » |
|
dont quote me on this but more that one person has said to me that 143's for the exeter area are a possibility
i believe could be as early as october but definatly once they are refurbed is what i have heard
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #19 on: August 25, 2008, 20:12:01 » |
|
dont quote me on this but more that one person has said to me that 143's for the exeter area are a possibility
FGW▸ have been so impressed with Exeter depot for improving the reliability of the 142's (which i'm led to believe are now the most reliable units in the FGW fleet) that they want Exeter to do the same to the 143's, the reason the 142's have become so reliable is because they all go back to the same depot each evening, the same as SWT▸ 's 159's so that there's no "passing the buck" with repairs, i.e. the common reply to a fault in a repair book "for attention of home depot".
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2008, 21:05:19 » |
|
Thanks for your post on that, vacman! That is certainly what Andrew Griffiths was saying, at the FOSBR▸ meeting I attended a few weeks ago: he was full of praise for Exeter depot staff, in achieving a rate of 3,000 mile per casualty for the 142s. Well done, chaps!
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2008, 21:07:47 » |
|
More like 6,500!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2008, 21:30:41 » |
|
Well, that's even better, then, Liam! 3,000 was the figure Andrew Griffiths quoted to me - and Ollie, who was also at that meeting - on 12 July 2008: see http://www.iworkforfgw.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=118
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
G.Uard
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2008, 06:41:46 » |
|
Rumour in the north of the area is that we are to get several 150/1 (non front gangwayed ) units. Anyone travelling frequently in the Brizzle area will already have experienced these as we currently have 2 or 3 in service, (green and blue paint job with a slam crew door).
Although the current units have 3+2 seating, a refurb could render the 'new' stock similar to existing 150/2s. From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smithy
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2008, 15:09:58 » |
|
Rumour in the north of the area is that we are to get several 150/1 (non front gangwayed ) units. Anyone travelling frequently in the Brizzle area will already have experienced these as we currently have 2 or 3 in service, (green and blue paint job with a slam crew door).
Although the current units have 3+2 seating, a refurb could render the 'new' stock similar to existing 150/2s. From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.
150001&2 coming december no gangway door but power crew doors,approx 10 more hybrid 3 cars 2009-2010. apparently once all sets recieved will have refresh to fgw standard and getting intermediate door controls and remote supply amongst other stuff.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
G.Uard
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2008, 18:43:18 » |
|
150001&2 coming december no gangway door but power crew doors,approx 10 more hybrid 3 cars 2009-2010. apparently once all sets recieved will have refresh to fgw standard and getting intermediate door controls and remote supply amongst other stuff.
Won't be that different from the 150/2s then. And....I for one love that nice big cab.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sprog
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2008, 13:09:48 » |
|
Rumour in the north of the area is that we are to get several 150/1 (non front gangwayed ) units. Anyone travelling frequently in the Brizzle area will already have experienced these as we currently have 2 or 3 in service, (green and blue paint job with a slam crew door).
Although the current units have 3+2 seating, a refurb could render the 'new' stock similar to existing 150/2s. From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.
fGW have 2 150/1s, 150121 & 150127. Been informed that both, plus any other we recieve from London Midland and LORL (formerly Silverlink), are to be 'refreshed' soon, possibly in-house to a simlar standard to the fGW 150/2s. The Class 143s, once refreshed, are going to be allocated to Exeter depot once the short-term lease 142s are returned, so that the 'pacer' fleet has a dedicated home depot (proved by the excellent work they have done on the 142 fleet, which are no reaching 6,500 MPC▸ ! - better than ANY od the DMU▸ classes in the Wessex Trains era.). In turn, SPM▸ will be allocated half of Exters 150s to lighten their already high workload. The eventual plan is to use the 150/1s on the Bristol local services etc, whilst keeping the 142/143s in Devon.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2008, 16:20:10 » |
|
So Roger Ford may be right FGW▸ may get some 150s from Overground or London Midland. However, it does seem a bit disingenuous of the DfT» to claim these are part of the 1300 "new" carriages, even if they are refurbished.
It's good to see Exeter improving the performance of the 142s, but even 6500 miles is still very low compared with a modern electric units which are getting 40K to 50K. However it does re-enforce the view that dedicated depots for single classes of units is way to improve performance.
One of the things that makes the current franchise set up so stupid is that Bletchley depot which dealt with Silverlinks 321s and was consistently awared silver spanners, was closed when whoever (I really can't be bother to work out which franchise runs which trains) took over moved their maintenance away from Bletchley.
When National Express take over First and First take over Arriva and Arriva take over National Express franchises what's the betting Exeter depot will be closed?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gaf71
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2008, 16:41:07 » |
|
From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.
I thought the 150/1's had intermediate door controls? Or am I thinking of the ex Arriva 150's? As for the 143's coming to Exeter(my depot), i'm glad the fitters are doing such a good job, put from a train crew and passenger point of view, it's bad news if you are in this area, as the pacers are the least comfortable for passengers, and the worst units to work(for traincrew). Not that we see much else down here these days anyway!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smithy
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2008, 19:32:07 » |
|
From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.
I thought the 150/1's had intermediate door controls? Or am I thinking of the ex Arriva 150's? As for the 143's coming to Exeter(my depot), i'm glad the fitters are doing such a good job, put from a train crew and passenger point of view, it's bad news if you are in this area, as the pacers are the least comfortable for passengers, and the worst units to work(for traincrew). Not that we see much else down here these days anyway! 150/1's dont only ex wessex and atw have it,apparently on refresh it is to be fitted
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|