Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
08:36 Redhill to Reading
09:00 Oxford to London Paddington
09:59 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
07:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
08:34 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
06:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 12:36 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 09:37:16 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[84] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[74] Thumpers for Dummies
[56] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[55] Railcard Prices going up
[46] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[45] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 36
  Print  
Author Topic: Falmouth Branch Line - stations, facilities, services and improvements - ongoing discussion, merged posts  (Read 280276 times)
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3490

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #285 on: August 12, 2010, 13:36:34 »

did they not plan ahead for the red arrows, everyone in Falmouth knew there were going to be up to 10000 extra people in falmouth for the display, the roads were mental so train was only option, also at that time of the evening surely they could of changed stock around so more carriages were available for the line?
i drove into Falmouth last night, and for anyone who knows falmouth it took me 90 mins to drive from the docks viewing area on castle drive, to the roundabout by mcdonalds and sainsburys, a distance of less than 3 miles!
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #286 on: August 12, 2010, 15:01:06 »

did they not plan ahead for the red arrows

Almost certainly, but I'm guessing that on a weekday there's only so much spare stock available to strengthen services like that.
Logged
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 662


View Profile
« Reply #287 on: August 12, 2010, 15:57:19 »

.... and they had contractors painting the hand rail at Falmouth Town during all this kerfuffle too. If I was running the operation I'd have ensured that the units were coupled and run continuously until 2330 ex Falmouth last night and additionally on Friday for the Fireworks.

Logged
caliwag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #288 on: August 12, 2010, 19:46:10 »

Contractors painting the handrail? unbelievable. What planet are these guys on? No chance of stock strengthening if they cannot even sort out basic maintenance works...Jeez.

You would have thought it would be a fantastic exercise in PR (Public Relations), for all concerned, to have arranged (there was plenty of notice) a 67 and rake of four, or whatever...just for the event. Everyone would have gone home thinking "well at least the trains worked"...just like the old days when BR (British Rail(ways)) swung into action...viz the popes visit in '82..I cannot imagine what the railways would do now.

Suspect the Maritime line, and other branches, are a complete irritant (a scunner we call it in Scotland!)

Bah...don't all reply at once! Angry
Logged
old original
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 901


View Profile
« Reply #289 on: August 12, 2010, 19:58:42 »

Contact FGW (First Great Western) in Swindon to tell them somethings going on in Cornwall and I suspect the response is.."where's that?"
Logged

8 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #290 on: August 12, 2010, 22:56:02 »

Contractors painting the handrail?

Agreed, that does sound pretty daft.

You would have thought it would be a fantastic exercise in PR (Public Relations), for all concerned, to have arranged (there was plenty of notice) a 67 and rake of four

I suspect that may be a non-starter due to infrastructure issues. First off I'm 90% sure there's no run-round facility at Falmouth, so you're talking top-and-tailed 67s for a start. I'm not sure either whether the track on the Falmouth line is up to 67s, which have a viciously high axle-loading and consequent low route availability. Don't know what platform lengths are like along the Maritime Line but there may be further problems there. And that's before you've even considered the cost of the operation you're proposing which, sadly, given the way the rail industry is currently structured, is probably prohibitive. Combine that with the very low fares charges on many of the Cornish branches and the result may well be that there is no business case for that kind of operation, despite the increased number of customers on the day.

viz the popes visit in '82..I cannot imagine what the railways would do now.

You'll find out next month!
Logged
caliwag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #291 on: August 12, 2010, 23:53:53 »

Yeah...fair point re run-rounds though I thought they F Docks had that facility. In terms of loading they have had steam and diesel turns down the branch recently, so I must be up to muster for locos.
My grouse is that FGW (First Great Western) didn't seem to acknowledge that the Falmouth event was an issue...there's nowhere to park in Falmouth so surely the railways should swing into action!!! FFS (for goodness' sake (a more polite definition))
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #292 on: August 13, 2010, 00:02:53 »

Agreed, they could havE used one of the many spare units that linger around Cornwall every day........
Logged
chrisoates
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 286


View Profile
« Reply #293 on: August 13, 2010, 02:50:09 »

Agreed, they could havE used one of the many spare units that linger around Cornwall every day........

Don't think there are many - St Ives is 2 x 150 for the summer and has had a 153 tacked on the back.
In winter I see odd units at laid up at Plymouth, Par, Truro - not now though.
In answer to others Falmouth is 30 Mph for non DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) and doesn't have run around.
Tonight even more problems with signalling.

Something like 7 million was spent on upgrading Falmouth to dual working and it's just not reliable.

 
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3490

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #294 on: August 13, 2010, 02:56:32 »

i always thought there is run round at Falmouth Docks in the sidings on the docks side of the platform, looking at google maps sidings are visible although google maps images are so old they dont show the passing loop at penryn, but show the old motor auctions, which have been gone 3 years at least so sidings could be long gone, although looks majorly overgrown so would almost be a non starter for usage, surely the 153 operating the route could of swapped diagrams for the day with a 150 somewhere? not sure what the comparable capacitys are, on the basis that the event was in the evening as well, would there not be units stabled somewhere not in use at that time of day. the event was around 7pm
with regards to platform length, from memory a 150 takes up no more than half of any of the platforms, barring possibly perranwell, as all platforms are long on route, although i think the passing loop at penryn may be restrictive to length

does st ives really need that much capacity more than Falmouth did on this one off event? would  at ives coped with losing 1 of its 150s for the evening?
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
caliwag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #295 on: August 13, 2010, 11:00:37 »

Quail indicates a run round on the freight branch just at the platform throat, if you can call a single line platform a throat!

It was there last month...a bit weedy, but there. Did the recent loco hauled excursions use that for loco release or were they top and tailed? Huh
Logged
FarWestJohn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 236


View Profile
« Reply #296 on: August 13, 2010, 12:08:23 »

The 153 units seem to becoming very unreliable. Not only was there a failure on Wednesday but also yesterday afternoon, Thursday. A unit failed at Penryn and was rescued and hauled back to Truro. A unit then formed a very late 1651 towards Falmouth.The 1624 to Penzance was also about 25 minutes late which did not help.

On Wednesday morning Radio Cornwall was asking everyone going to Falmouth week to use public transport where possible train, bus or park and ride Then in the same report saying the train had been replaced by a bus service.

Anyone know the main reason for these failures?

All the sidings track work at Falmouth docks has been cleared of undergrowth and many sleepers are marked for replacement. The rail heads also have markings saying 'grind' in many places. There must be some future use planned for this work to be required?
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #297 on: August 13, 2010, 19:39:19 »

Agreed, they could havE used one of the many spare units that linger around Cornwall every day........

Don't think there are many - St Ives is 2 x 150 for the summer and has had a 153 tacked on the back.
In winter I see odd units at laid up at Plymouth, Par, Truro - not now though.
In answer to others Falmouth is 30 Mph for non DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) and doesn't have run around.
Tonight even more problems with signalling.

Something like 7 million was spent on upgrading Falmouth to dual working and it's just not reliable.

 


You missed the irony in my post  Smiley
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6554


View Profile
« Reply #298 on: August 13, 2010, 20:10:14 »

You missed the irony in my post  Smiley
I didn't and knew exactly where you were coming from...there are no spare units hanging around here or anywhere else in the country.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #299 on: August 15, 2010, 10:14:37 »

Chirs is quite right about there being a 30MPH speed limit on the branch for non-DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) trains, last year they coupled both units together for this event during the evening, bloody useless!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 36
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page