swlines
|
|
« Reply #60 on: July 07, 2008, 17:43:39 » |
|
Their are still problems.
People will still use the key peak trains, so overcrowding will get worse. Virgin XC▸ found this out when they did Operation Princess - spreading did not occur. SWT▸ on the other hand with their massive timetable rebuild put the spreading of passengers over services key into the timetable - which did extremely well. It depends how well you advertise it and also, on ticketing! Add benefits for travelling later and earlier (Early Bird come to mind, TPE▸ offer this) then there will be more of an uptake of shoulder peak services.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #61 on: July 18, 2008, 18:21:40 » |
|
Well lets put some things straight, the current service is actually 2 hourly near enough during the day and uses 2x153's coupled, there are currently 12 trains per day, the new timetable has I believe 27 trains per day, the 0755 from Fal usually loads around 100 passengers on arrival at Truro, if there were another service 30 mins later then it would spread the load. As it is now, after the 0755 trip you can usually just about manage when there is a 153 on the branch, with double the trains then there will be more empty seats to fill.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #62 on: July 18, 2008, 19:05:54 » |
|
Well lets put some things straight, the current service is actually 2 hourly near enough during the day and uses 2x153's coupled, there are currently 12 trains per day, the new timetable has I believe 27 trains per day, the 0755 from Fal usually loads around 100 passengers on arrival at Truro, if there were another service 30 mins later then it would spread the load. As it is now, after the 0755 trip you can usually just about manage when there is a 153 on the branch, with double the trains then there will be more empty seats to fill.
"Load spreading" may not happen - it didn't with Virgin.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #63 on: July 18, 2008, 19:46:07 » |
|
Well lets put some things straight, the current service is actually 2 hourly near enough during the day and uses 2x153's coupled, there are currently 12 trains per day, the new timetable has I believe 27 trains per day, the 0755 from Fal usually loads around 100 passengers on arrival at Truro, if there were another service 30 mins later then it would spread the load. As it is now, after the 0755 trip you can usually just about manage when there is a 153 on the branch, with double the trains then there will be more empty seats to fill.
"Load spreading" may not happen - it didn't with Virgin. It's happened more towards Bristol and Birmingham on Virgin - than down south...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Karl
|
|
« Reply #64 on: July 18, 2008, 20:11:37 » |
|
Evening
The idea of the half an hour service on the Falmouth to Truro branchline, is to provide a better more frequent service/s. With Tremough Campus (which is still expanding and was given Planning Permission again this week for more), the idea was to link this with city of Truro and Falmouth with its port. With more people expected to arrive at Tremough, plus the development of Falmouth Docks into a marina and terminal for roll-on roll-off, the hope is to attract more people onto the train and off Cornwalls roads a lot of which cannot cope with more. With this the gaps which oooooo and others has said will arouse, they would be hopefully be filled with more people eventually.
There are already links in place with Tremough, it was discussed at a partnership meeting that the information pack all students recieve should contain information about the branchline with leaflets on student railcards e.t.c to entise them in. This information pack is in different languages, although it is possible for a student to buy a wreck in a pub for ^350, I think there has been an improvement in students using the train. There usually is a rep from the campus at our partnership meeting as well.
Regards
Karl.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #65 on: July 18, 2008, 21:45:43 » |
|
Well lets put some things straight, the current service is actually 2 hourly near enough during the day and uses 2x153's coupled, there are currently 12 trains per day, the new timetable has I believe 27 trains per day, the 0755 from Fal usually loads around 100 passengers on arrival at Truro, if there were another service 30 mins later then it would spread the load. As it is now, after the 0755 trip you can usually just about manage when there is a 153 on the branch, with double the trains then there will be more empty seats to fill.
This concurs with my comment on 5/7. Given there will be 75ish seats on each train, this is going to be a massive improvement, even in the peak. So I hope it is regarded as the major step forward that it is, which with no increase in rolling stock is a very imaginative way of providing an increased service with minimal increase in running costs.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #66 on: July 18, 2008, 23:38:03 » |
|
Well lets put some things straight, the current service is actually 2 hourly near enough during the day and uses 2x153's coupled, there are currently 12 trains per day, the new timetable has I believe 27 trains per day, the 0755 from Fal usually loads around 100 passengers on arrival at Truro, if there were another service 30 mins later then it would spread the load. As it is now, after the 0755 trip you can usually just about manage when there is a 153 on the branch, with double the trains then there will be more empty seats to fill.
"Load spreading" may not happen - it didn't with Virgin. Have you ever even travelled on the Fal to make a justified comment?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Karl
|
|
« Reply #67 on: July 19, 2008, 13:47:35 » |
|
Afternoon
Well the hope is that there will be a lot more people travelling. The problem with the timetable at the moment is there are too many big gaps and timings that are not always ideally suited for some. Once the timetable is in place I would expect to see double the amount we already have, with hiking fuel prices and a return bus fare (falmouth to Truro), being around ^4.50, it is hoped that a half an hour or 45min timetable will entise a lot more people.
As regards to motive power it will be a 2x single c153's, but once the service is up and running, if funding a vailabilty are there it could be 2x c150's, but only if its vaible.
There 'maybe' a chance of an additional train after the last arrive at Truro (which currently is MON - FRI 21:54pm, SAT 22:08pm) which will be 22:xxm off Truro (probably 22:30pm for Falmouth). I would guess that Sundays (22:00pm) will stay the same don't know why FGW▸ have done this on the present timetable; it should be either FRI or SAT?
Regards
Karl.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #68 on: July 19, 2008, 16:17:49 » |
|
Well lets put some things straight, the current service is actually 2 hourly near enough during the day and uses 2x153's coupled, there are currently 12 trains per day, the new timetable has I believe 27 trains per day, the 0755 from Fal usually loads around 100 passengers on arrival at Truro, if there were another service 30 mins later then it would spread the load. As it is now, after the 0755 trip you can usually just about manage when there is a 153 on the branch, with double the trains then there will be more empty seats to fill.
"Load spreading" may not happen - it didn't with Virgin. Have you ever even travelled on the Fal to make a justified comment? No, I got the ferry service when I was in the area. But I said might.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lee
|
|
« Reply #69 on: September 24, 2008, 07:01:26 » |
|
From the FGW▸ website :
06:27 Truro to Falmouth Docks due 06:50
This train has been cancelled.This is due to a delay on a previous journey.
06:55 Falmouth Docks to Truro due 07:19
This train has been cancelled.This is due to a delay on a previous journey.
This is the first round trip of the day, so does anyone know why there was a delay on a previous journey?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #70 on: September 24, 2008, 16:35:39 » |
|
Late from depot...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #71 on: September 24, 2008, 20:55:26 » |
|
For some unknown reason the unit's were at Longrock last night rather than in the station and I'm led to believe that there was no driver to bring in the set.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #72 on: September 24, 2008, 22:23:29 » |
|
Thanks, vacman You don't mean someone forgot there was a train to run, do you?? Chris
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
jester
|
|
« Reply #73 on: September 25, 2008, 00:35:11 » |
|
They go to the depot for cleaning and fuel but last night there was an engineering possesion between Pz and the depot. Should have finished in time for them to come back but.......
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #74 on: September 25, 2008, 00:40:58 » |
|
Ah, yes ... "but ..." ! Well, these things happen: thanks for your helpful local comment, jester!
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
|