grahame
|
|
« Reply #75 on: March 27, 2011, 07:19:20 » |
|
In the budget speech:
"1305: ^100m will be added to the science budget, Mr Osborne says. ^200m extra will be invested in regional railways - including schemes in Manchester, and Swindon to Kemble. ...."
More detailed question that someone posed to me: "If the Swindon -> Kemble section is a scheme (in part) to provide improved diversionary robustness during electrification of the Severn Tunnel, does this announcement also include other much smaller items such as re-instating the link from Bradford North Junction to Bradford East Junction to allow for diversions during the electrification of Box Tunnel?"
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Deltic
|
|
« Reply #76 on: March 27, 2011, 10:36:23 » |
|
Much as we might like to see that chord reinstated, I suspect that a diversion via Bristol Parkway will be quicker and requires no additional infrastructure. The additional signalling for 2 junctions would probably be quite expensive.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #77 on: March 27, 2011, 10:38:15 » |
|
I suspect the surveys would need doing again?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #78 on: March 27, 2011, 10:56:55 » |
|
... I suspect that a diversion via Bristol Parkway will be quicker and requires no additional infrastructure ...
True, but it then means that you've got to make alternative arrangements for "Chippenham Platform" and "Bath Halt". Oh - wait - they can be quite busy
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #79 on: March 27, 2011, 11:10:22 » |
|
True, but it then means that you've got to make alternative arrangements for "Chippenham Platform" and "Bath Halt". Oh - wait - they can be quite busy Exactly, though Bath passengers can be served by sending some Bristol to London services via the Berks and Hants. Chippenham served by a more frequent Transwilts services to connect at either Swindon or Westbury for London.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #80 on: March 27, 2011, 12:09:27 » |
|
Exactly, though Bath passengers can be served by sending some Bristol to London services via the Berks and Hants. Chippenham served by a more frequent Transwilts services to connect at either Swindon or Westbury for London.
Yes - there's a degree of sense in that ... running Temple Meads services hourly via Trowbridge and via Badminton. Hourly TransWilts (each way) at those times (3 train service rather than the proposed 2, Swindon to Salisbury) with connections at Trowbridge and Swindon for London [for Chippenham and Melksham passengers]. Doesn't do great things for Chippenham to Bath and Bristol passengers - need to watch the connections at Trowbridge!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
chris from stroud
|
|
« Reply #81 on: April 01, 2011, 23:18:40 » |
|
I only posted this one, as my own: there is no such publication as the Kemble Chronicle. CfN. With articles like that, why on earth not? I may head out to Kemble tomorrow to get a few photos of the current state of the line beyond Kemble tunnel. I'm quite intrigued as to how they're going to manage with the level crossing at Minety.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Guaranteed line improvements wherever I go (with the exception of Salcombe, which never had one to begin with ): Falmouth, The Cotswolds and Stroud. Melksham or Tavistock next, then?
|
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #84 on: April 02, 2011, 20:40:43 » |
|
Hmm ... they may well have to reposition those satellite dishes!
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #85 on: April 03, 2011, 08:01:50 » |
|
More detailed question that someone posed to me: "If the Swindon -> Kemble section is a scheme (in part) to provide improved diversionary robustness during electrification of the Severn Tunnel, does this announcement also include other much smaller items such as re-instating the link from Bradford North Junction to Bradford East Junction to allow for diversions during the electrification of Box Tunnel?"
Nothing to special about Box Tunnel relatively short, dry and it is straight and level.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #86 on: April 03, 2011, 09:08:43 » |
|
Straight perhaps, but I think you'll find it has a 1 in 100 gradient through it, falling towards the Bath end. Hmm ... they may well have to reposition those satellite dishes! I would be more worried about that post for the electricity supply, which has somehow been placed inside the railway boundary.
|
|
« Last Edit: April 03, 2011, 09:56:26 by willc »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chris from stroud
|
|
« Reply #87 on: April 05, 2011, 19:12:08 » |
|
At last, I've got some photos! You are indeed right willc, the house by Minety crossing is in no danger whatsoever. The road could do with a fair bit of work, mind. Feast your eyes here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gloucestershirerail/
|
|
|
Logged
|
Guaranteed line improvements wherever I go (with the exception of Salcombe, which never had one to begin with ): Falmouth, The Cotswolds and Stroud. Melksham or Tavistock next, then?
|
|
|
stebbo
|
|
« Reply #88 on: June 26, 2011, 13:00:48 » |
|
The local Gloucestershire paper has an interesting report yesterday on page 12. The go-ahead for the redoubling will allow the introduction of EXPRESS trains on the Swindon/Gloucester/Cheltenham line - complete with nice pic of an HST▸ ......
Where do they get this stuff?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #89 on: June 26, 2011, 13:05:21 » |
|
Oooh, non stop swindon-gloucester, how useful!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|