devon_metro
|
|
« on: August 12, 2008, 18:16:48 » |
|
Only posting a few of the mad changes:
Cheltenham trains are retimed to xx18 from Paddington and 2 are extended to Worcester. Additional early morning HSTs▸ from Bristol - Frome and Cheltenham Bedminster, Worle and Weston Milton will get HST services Relief service to follow 1506 limited stop HST which is now fast from Reading - Taunton Seven Tunnel Jn will receive peak HST services Golden Hind leaves Penzance 10 minutes earlier and calls additionally at a few Cornish stations Ivybridge gets additional stops from HSTs Late night HST from Paignton - Newton A is extended to Plymouth Additional morning Oxford - Paddington 1708 WSM-PAD» calls KYN,OLF does not call DID» 1833 Pad - OXford does not call maidenhead
Lots more!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2008, 18:25:02 » |
|
Out of interest, is there somewhere we can view the rest of the changes from December Liam?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2008, 18:28:21 » |
|
How much more slack is there on the Cotswold line?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2008, 18:28:50 » |
|
I have purposefully been vague as the info is not really in the public domain yet and was obtained from NR» .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2008, 18:43:22 » |
|
Only posting a few of the mad changes:
Additional early morning HSTs▸ from Bristol - Frome and Cheltenham Bedminster, Worle and Weston Milton will get HST services Seven Tunnel Jn will receive peak HST services
Lots more!!
Worle and Milton currently get HSTs, but Bedminster is new. Which service(s) will they be? I'm sure I suggested stopping a HST service at STJ▸ in the peak a few months ago to provide a London service for the Forest of Dean/Chepstow catchment, but can't find any reference to it, so maybe I was dreaming. I thought the HST fleet was pretty fully utilised in the peak, so I'm fairly surprised that an extra 3 workings are possible.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
johoare
|
|
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2008, 18:51:05 » |
|
1833 Pad - OXford does not call maidenhead
Lots more!!
Nooo!!! Dearie me.. Will we all have to jump off as it speeds thru Maidenhead? Just when FGW▸ seemed to be improving the timetable to nearly as good as it used to be, they start removing fast Maidenhead trains again..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BBM
|
|
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2008, 19:34:52 » |
|
If the Cheltenham trains are retimed to xx18 from Paddington what'll be going into the xx48 slots?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2008, 19:50:20 » |
|
Bedwyn presumably
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2008, 23:13:11 » |
|
Cheltenham trains are retimed to xx18 from Paddington and 2 are extended to Worcester. Though it's not that long since there were a couple of services that used to run on to Worcester. Up until a couple of years ago? Presumably this move helps with the provision of hourly-Gloucester-Worcester trains, but perhaps more interesting is whether, with SDO▸ now available, they will stop at Ashchurch, giving it a direct London link.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2008, 23:47:27 » |
|
With both ATW▸ and LM▸ extending their trains to Cheltenham, aren't things going to get a little crowded? I doubt the HSTs▸ will call at Ashchurch - the priority flow is B'ham. However, they should - the extra journey time won't matter as Worcester - London via Oxford is much faster anyway. There is also the forgotten commuter market between Worcester and Ashchurch. I hope the damage has not been too severe - the commuters who turned up at Ashchurch a few years back, only to see that their trains to work and school had been scrapped overnight* might still prefer the M5. Especially if the alternative is an overcrowded and dirty 170 queueing outside New Street in a tunnel for half an hour. *they obviously did not keep up to date with the changes
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #10 on: August 13, 2008, 09:36:53 » |
|
HSTs▸ *will* call Ashchurch
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #11 on: August 13, 2008, 16:05:07 » |
|
HSTs▸ will call Ashchurch.
Good.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dog box
|
|
« Reply #12 on: August 13, 2008, 19:14:22 » |
|
bedminster is interesting..hopefully the derelict bits of the platform will be made useable again
|
|
|
Logged
|
All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 13, 2008, 19:46:41 » |
|
bedminster is interesting..hopefully the derelict bits of the platform will be made useable again
They lengthened an extra 20m or so of the down platform about a year ago. Always wondered why they did it given the usable length previously was emough for 4 coach DMUs▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2008, 21:42:03 » |
|
I agree, John - I, too, had wondered why that extra section of the platform at Bedminster was given new tarmac, some time ago!
I've also noticed recently that new boards for 'HST▸ 7 car' and 'HST 8 car' stopping points have been added at Bedminster - rather bizarrely, to the subway railings facing onto the track, rather than facing up the track, where the drivers of oncoming trains would be better able to see them??
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
|