IndustryInsider
|
|
« on: July 02, 2008, 12:41:11 » |
|
Anybody else notice the number of signs at our FGW▸ stations seems to be growing at a daily rate? Most of them seem to be either inappropriate, confusing, or inaccurate, (or all three!) and I invite others to add others that they have noticed. I continue my campaign to highlight stupid station signs with this view of the new, improved, cycle storage facilities at Hanborough. Just in case you miss stupid meaningless sign no. 1 concerning the risk of your cycle being 'searched' at any time, a duplicate sign has been put up about 4 feet away. Not that you're able to use these facilities anyway however as the other sign clearly states that you are not allowed to pass that point and access the cycle racks anyway. I give up!
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2008, 12:44:46 » |
|
Brilliant. Love the irony.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
G.Uard
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2008, 17:53:47 » |
|
According to a recent training session I had, cycle frame tubes can be packed with semtex and exploded remotely, using a cycle lamp as power source. Which is why, (I believe, that all stations having cycle storage must also be covered by CCTV▸ ).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2008, 20:17:38 » |
|
According to a recent training session I had, cycle frame tubes can be packed with semtex and exploded remotely, using a cycle lamp as power source. Which is why, (I believe, that all stations having cycle storage must also be covered by CCTV▸ ).
Which is a little absurd as a person so minded could wear a belt around their waste packed with semtex
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
TerminalJunkie
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2008, 21:34:07 » |
|
wear a belt around their waste I hope you meant 'waist'. If you didn't: urrrrrrggggghhhhhhhh....
|
|
|
Logged
|
Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2008, 21:45:41 » |
|
TerminalJunkie, are you an online spell checker robot?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2008, 00:20:31 » |
|
According to a recent training session I had, cycle frame tubes can be packed with semtex and exploded remotely, using a cycle lamp as power source. Which is why, (I believe, that all stations having cycle storage must also be covered by CCTV▸ ).
Thanks for that useful information, G.Uard. Indeed, the hollow metal tubes making up a bicycle frame can be used to secrete explosives such as 'semtex' (other explosive substances are available), and I believe they were, in Northern Ireland in past days of the 'troubles', for example. However, it's interesting that all stations having cycle storage must also be covered by CCTV. At Nailsea & Backwell, the one area of the whole station that is not covered at all by the (two) CCTV cameras is the cycle storage area under platform 2: see http://www.raildocuments.org.uk/apr08photos/130408nailsea4.jpg
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
Karl
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 03, 2008, 01:01:29 » |
|
Morning
It is a hotch potch isn't it!
Two of the signs look to be the same in the picture supplied. Prehaps the signs were fitted by approved contactor and they have just followed, or misunderstood and put them up as seen. The trespass sign does need to be moved along with one of identical signs, that would probably make things clearer?! Altough TOCs▸ are hot on signage these days, prehaps to cover themselves legally?
I wonder how long the new cycle shelter will last?!
Regards
Karl.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oooooo
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2008, 01:13:01 » |
|
I like the sign on the up platform at Devonport which states 'this platform for stations to Plymouth', what stations would these be?? Wingfield Villas Halt is long gone!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2008, 10:09:51 » |
|
Anybody else notice the number of signs at our FGW▸ stations seems to be growing at a daily rate? Most of them seem to be either inappropriate, confusing, or inaccurate, (or all three!) and I invite others to add others that they have noticed.
Your observation is well noted as far as Taplow is concerned. Do you know we now have more no smoking signs than information about catching trains, getting tickets (when office is not manned) which platform for where, etc, etc. I don't think we've got the cycle rack ones yet will be going up the station later. I did post something about shouldn't railway stations have information about how to catch a train where you might go from that station and when, how to get tickets etc. There are still a large number of people who haven't travelled by train at all or for a long time who are totally bemused when they arrrive at the station as to what they need to do to catch a train. But at least they know they are not allowed to smoke. Which is propbably a good thing because the stress might tempt them to light up.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mojo
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2008, 17:19:05 » |
|
Signs have recently gone up at Filton Abbey Wood too. A number of signs reading "Cyclists dismount" under one with a 'No cycling' pictogram & number of signs asking you to hold onto the handrail when using the ramps. The sign above the ticket hut (which has been open about 10 times in the past 2 years) used to read "Tickets" now reads "Tickets & Information."
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2008, 17:34:09 » |
|
This will mean nothing to anyone who doesn't know what I'm on about... Mojo, have any got lots of round circles on?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tramway
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 03, 2008, 17:51:58 » |
|
Signs have recently gone up at Filton Abbey Wood too. A number of signs reading "Cyclists dismount" under one with a 'No cycling' pictogram & number of signs asking you to hold onto the handrail when using the ramps. The sign above the ticket hut (which has been open about 10 times in the past 2 years) used to read "Tickets" now reads "Tickets & Information." Actually the one about holding onto the handrails on the footbridge is quite appropriate at Filton as it's lethal in the winter as it's rarely de-iced and a number of people have come a cropper on it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gwr2006
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 03, 2008, 19:17:28 » |
|
Morning
It is a hotch potch isn't it!
Two of the signs look to be the same in the picture supplied. Prehaps the signs were fitted by approved contactor and they have just followed, or misunderstood and put them up as seen. The trespass sign does need to be moved along with one of identical signs, that would probably make things clearer?! Altough TOCs▸ are hot on signage these days, prehaps to cover themselves legally?
I wonder how long the new cycle shelter will last?!
Regards
Karl.
The new cycle shelter sits alongside an identical shelter that has been there for several years untouched by the vandals. There are two signs for two shelters as they were installed at different times. Common sense says you just need one! With more and more people cycling to the station, the amount of parking has been doubled. The cycle parking used to be accessed from the car park but is now reached from the platform (due to a neighbouring development blocking the access). The original cycle and trespass sign were correct but now need to be moved to the next post along! I think all these works have been paid for by the county council, who also provided a new waiting shelter and fencing along the platform recently.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mojo
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 03, 2008, 20:58:36 » |
|
Actually the one about holding onto the handrails on the footbridge is quite appropriate at Filton as it's lethal in the winter as it's rarely de-iced and a number of people have come a cropper on it.
Tell me about it, I saw loads of people slip over, even up until March this year when it gets slighlty cold. It seems lots of the grip has come away with bare metal being revealed on the original part. Why can't they just resurface it?! I made a number of complaints after seeing others sliding along a few days! Only problem... there is no handrail on the part over the third track, which is just as bad when it's frosty!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|