The full-year trading update, which was the main topic of those news reports, is short. It's only about the same length as each article, so they mostly just repeat its content.
There was also some mention of
First Group's submission to the consultation on the Railways Bill here:
From Business Live, via MSNIn comments to the DfT» submitted on Monday, Firstgroup expressed apprehension that GBR▸ could display "adverse monopolistic" behaviour, advocating for the Office of Rail and Road (ORR» ) regulator, responsible for approving new routes, to be "empowered to adjudicate fairly and impartially with fair, transparent and open decision-making."
That submission is 22 pages, and hard to summarise as it answers the questions in order. Much of it does, as suggested, argue the case for open access to be maintained, with the ORR seen as a neutral referee to protect it. They also make a case for the passenger to have official allies:
4.1 First Group support a strengthened role for a passenger watchdog in the form of the Passenger Standards Authority (PSA). However, we are concerned at a macro level that the passenger is under-represented in the proposed industry structure given:
...
6.1 FirstGroup supports the continuation of a common Rail Ombudsman (RO) service across all operators, and we would expect GBR to be subject to the RO service on the same terms as other operators.
Yesterday's
Times had quite a long article - over half a page - specifically on the case made for open access, and how important that will be for First once its service contracts end.