Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:55 09 Mar 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 13/03/25 - Community Rail Awards
19/03/25 - WWRUG AGM
19/03/25 - Forum offline 00:00 - 02:00
21/03/25 - TravelWatch SouthWest

On this day
9th Mar (2015)
Rail industry confirms future potential demand for new trains and carriages (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:37 Port Talbot Parkway to London Paddington
22:15 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 09, 2025, 23:12:20 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[103] 25th May 2025 - SWR Franchise expires and services Nationalise...
[56] Train fare dodger told to pay nearly £1,000
[53] 21st March 2025 - TravelWatch SouthWest General meeting
[50] Cirencester branch: Thames bridge question
[49] Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
[46] Taxi access to stations
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cirencester branch: Thames bridge question  (Read 96 times)
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1860


View Profile
« on: Today at 11:06:47 »

A complicated structure, being rail over road over river. It's long gone, presumably it imposed a wriggle on the road there. The culvert that carried the river Thames beneath both road and rail has survived, mind, and at some stage the railway gave its interior a lining of 1890s era blue brick. Do photos exist of the railway viaduct though, does anyone know?

Mark

https://i.postimg.cc/90Fx9FFp/cirencester-branch-thames-bridge-1000.jpg
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7399


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: Today at 12:56:44 »

Try this:  https://kembleandewen-pc.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Dennis-Moss-and-photographs-of-Kemble-and-1Ewen.pdf
At the end of the document are a couple of photos identified as "Kemble, the first bridge over the Thames, Clayfurlong Bridge, 1904". The road bridge looks very much like it does now, and the railway bridge is just a rather fuzzy shape in the background. However, it's clear that it (and the embankment) were very high.
Logged
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1860


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: Today at 14:47:05 »

Thanks for this. So... a single, substantial & distinctive masonry arch. Somewhere, I've read some derogatory comment about it (the author biassed by their feelings for this modern-world intrusion into the world of the upper Thames). Perhaps it did put a kink into the road, or perhaps someone was keen to demolish it for the masonry, which elsewhere on the Cirencester branch is good stuff.

Good to have a name too: Clayfurlong bridge (marked as a viaduct on some OS (Ordnance Survey) maps).

(The photos are from the same negative - in the tinted one, someone's removed the figure...)

It was quite a dramatic crossing of the valley. Here's the view from upstream, the gap slightly lost in trees.

Mark

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page