Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 04:15 25 Feb 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 27/02/25 - Portsmouth anyone?
03/03/25 - Melksham -> Inverness
06/03/25 - Go-op Crowd Funding closes
06/03/25 - Inverness -> Melksham

On this day
25th Feb (1841)
Swindon Works authorised (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
25/02/25 05:47 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
25/02/25 06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
25/02/25 07:04 Bath Spa to Filton Abbey Wood
25/02/25 07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
25/02/25 07:44 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
25/02/25 08:11 Gloucester to Frome
25/02/25 08:43 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
06:36 Yeovil Pen Mill to Filton Abbey Wood
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 25, 2025, 04:20:30 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[221] Looe timetable changes this Summer
[200] Petition for drivers to be "presumed liable" for cyclist colli...
[58] Railway station could get 300 extra trains a week thanks to £...
[49] Heritage rail locations across the area
[41] Collision between car and train on the Looe Branch - 24 May 23
[32] 30/09/23 - Where Was I?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Petition for drivers to be "presumed liable" for cyclist collisions.  (Read 120 times)
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 758


View Profile
« on: Yesterday at 09:42:46 »

"The government has been urged to introduce presumed liability for civil cases relating to certain road collisions, a move which would see motorists presumed liable when involved in incidents involving cyclists, pedestrians or horse riders."

Road C.C. article

I'm in an interesting situation in that I cycled more than quarter of a million miles and was a strong defender of cyclists. During that time I had a few bad experiences with motorists, usually down to their carelessness, though there were a couple of cases involving young yobs.

But on half-a-dozen occasions in recent years it's only been my alertness that has prevented me driving into an idiot cyclist. Had I done so, I would have had difficulty in proving that I was not at fault. (Some times I'd noticed a cyclist riding on the pavement, only for him to suddenly switch to the road in front of me,as I'd half anticipated.) And as a pedestrian I've had a dozen close encounters with pavement cyclists.

It's reassuring that some of the comments appended to the road.cc article are balanced and recognise that some cyclists are their own worst enemies.

I still regard cycles - and even "illegal" e-scooters - as an ideal way of getting around, provided they're used sensibly.
Logged
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2122


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 11:20:39 »

The idea is not altogether new, it is already the case in some European countries.

And yes "some cyclists are their own worst enemies" as are some motorists, although the previous administration would not have liked to see it that way.

Much as we might hope it is unlikely to happen, to many votes in cars, and most elected members worship at the altar of the great god motorcar.
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 869


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 18:31:39 »

Terrible idea which I hope will be consigned to the bin forthwith.

Where necessary liabilty for an RTC involving cyclists should be apportioned to the actual guilty party rather than on the basis of a preset assumption.

And in my experience - I cycle around 5000 miles a year - it is quite commonly other cyclists or pedestrians at fault.

 
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8516



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 20:32:52 »

Only 4,500 signatures in over 3 months.......not much of an urge?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page