Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 00:15 25 Feb 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 27/02/25 - Portsmouth anyone?
03/03/25 - Melksham -> Inverness
06/03/25 - Go-op Crowd Funding closes
06/03/25 - Inverness -> Melksham

On this day
25th Feb (1841)
Swindon Works authorised (link)

Train RunningCancelled
25/02/25 05:47 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
25/02/25 06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
25/02/25 06:44 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
25/02/25 07:04 Bath Spa to Filton Abbey Wood
25/02/25 07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
25/02/25 07:44 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
25/02/25 08:11 Gloucester to Frome
25/02/25 08:43 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
25/02/25 06:36 Yeovil Pen Mill to Filton Abbey Wood
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 25, 2025, 00:19:13 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[221] Looe timetable changes this Summer
[200] Petition for drivers to be "presumed liable" for cyclist colli...
[58] Railway station could get 300 extra trains a week thanks to £...
[49] Heritage rail locations across the area
[41] Collision between car and train on the Looe Branch - 24 May 23
[32] 30/09/23 - Where Was I?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Railway station could get 300 extra trains a week thanks to £1.75billion project  (Read 176 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13159


View Profile Email
« on: February 23, 2025, 19:47:18 »

From Business Live, via MSN

Quote
Plans are underway for nearly 300 additional trains to pass through Cheltenham Spa railway station each week, thanks to a £1.75 billion hub project. Cheltenham MP (Member of Parliament) Max Wilkinson met with Midlands Connect and rail executives on Wednesday to discuss the plans.

The Midlands Rail Hub project, valued at £1.75 billion, is set to provide approximately four million extra seats annually for passengers travelling between Cheltenham and Birmingham. This will be achieved by adding an extra four trains per hour on the route, two in each direction.

In 2023, the previous Government pledged full delivery of the Midlands Rail Hub, and in February last year, an additional £123m was allocated towards the project for detailed engineering designs. Construction is slated to run from 2025 to 2033.

Max Wilkinson said: "Cheltenham's rail connections are very important for our local economy. Improved links are vital for our town – primarily for business travellers, but also for leisure trips.

"Whether it's to the Midlands, towards Bristol, the North or London, we'll benefit from easier access to and from our town.

"I'm interested to hear more about the positive opportunities offered by the Midlands Rail Hub and other future Improvements too."

Paul Butters, director of communications at Midlands Connect, said: "It was great to meet Max, brief him on the plans and explain how the Midlands Rail Hub could deliver a massive transport boost for the town.

"Delivering faster and more frequent trains to Cheltenham would make a massive difference and we are working hard to deliver it.

"I look forward to working with Max in the months and years ahead to deliver this vital scheme for the region."

The meeting also included representatives from the West Midlands Rail Executive.
Logged
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1497


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 05:19:49 »

What I would like to see at Cheltenham is a cross over south of the station so terminating trains could save going into the sidings,
with an extra platform next to the south bound platform so that trains could stable there as well,save going into the sidings

On the North bound side,why not have a bi-directional platform,so late arrivals could a more or less effect an immediate departure.

I would like to say about the over head wires for electrification,but newer technology might have more of a say in any decision on over head wires in the future.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10410


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 06:13:21 »

There were proposals for two south facing bays fairly recently, so perhaps they will resurface if more trains will be using what is already a very congested station?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 712



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 09:30:17 »

So tempting to mention dreams of a reinstatement of the route to Birmingham "via Honeybourne"

The Midland line up as far as Abbotswood Jcn is going to be very congested with these extras each needing a path, plus the pfaffing about required for a train from the Birmingham direction terminating and reversing at Cheltenham Spa Lansdown
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4514


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 10:49:23 »

So tempting to mention dreams of a reinstatement of the route to Birmingham "via Honeybourne"

The Midland line up as far as Abbotswood Jcn is going to be very congested with these extras each needing a path, plus the pfaffing about required for a train from the Birmingham direction terminating and reversing at Cheltenham Spa Lansdown

Why would it need to terminate at Cheltenham when it could go on to Gloucester where there is surely plenty of space. 
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 569


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 18:28:26 »

Ah, Lib Dem MP (Member of Parliament) on pre-election manoevres perhaps?

Didn't think the Midlands Rail Hub was a done deal by any means.

IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly) the proposal was a train per hour from Birmingham to Cardiff, and one per hour from Birmingham to Bristol, possibly joining at Cheltenham Spa (though that seems a bit dubious operationally)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page