Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 04:15 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:58 Westbury to Portsmouth Harbour
06:31 Truro to Falmouth Docks
06:52 Par to Newquay
07:15 Falmouth Docks to Truro
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 04:30:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Proposed further redoubling (England's Economic Heartland report)  (Read 1293 times)
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1283


View Profile Email
« on: February 19, 2025, 11:09:22 »

The ever assiduous Oxford Clarion has picked up a new report from England's Economic Heartland and both Oxfordshire and Worcestershire County Councils.

It calls for redoubling between Wolvercot Junction and Hanborough, and between Evesham and Pershore. This would enable a 2tph service:

  • 1tph Paddington, Reading, Oxford, Hanborough, Charlbury, Kingham, Moreton, Evesham, Worcs Parkway, Worcester SH, Droitwich, Kidderminster, Stourbridge
  • 1tph Paddington, Reading, Oxford, Hanborough, Charlbury, Kingham, Moreton, Honeybourne, Evesham, Pershore, Worcs Parkway, Worcester SH, Worcester FS, Malvern Link, Great Malvern
  • A further 2tph Didcot-Oxford-Hanborough
  • Four daily extensions to/from Hereford

For this part of the line, that's a huge improvement on the North Cotswold Line Taskforce's previous proposal, which would have dropped the Charlbury and Kingham stops from the Kidderminster/Stourbridge service.

The report argues that an improved service will support housing growth particularly in the Worcester area and at Salt Cross (near Hanborough). Some interesting stats and graphs in the report - it's worth reading.

I'm still not convinced that Kidderminster and Stourbridge merit an hourly service, given that London journeys will be quicker via HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) and that Chiltern's foray into Kidderminster/Stourbridge—Marylebone mostly carried fresh air. But if it's no longer at the expense of the stations that people actually use, knock yourself out I guess.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2025, 14:30:49 »

Report attached to this post. The CLPG» (Cotswold Line Promotion Group - about) has been involved with this.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2025, 14:53:03 »

Good to see an update on the original Taskforce proposal that was published at an unfortunate time with Covid about to hit.

Since then ridership is booming.  Worcestershire Parkway has developed into a big success story and to see places like Hanborough now comfortably above pre-pandemic levels means there is a growing need for something to be done.

Most of the London trains are now full by Oxford, especially the morning 5-car services.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1283


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2025, 16:23:33 »

Indeed - there were people standing in the vestibules on the 11.10ish departure from Charlbury yesterday. And if/when the proposed new towns at Worcestershire Parkway, Salt Cross, and (I think) near Pershore/Wyre Piddle go ahead, that will bring even more demand.
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 580


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2025, 22:59:34 »

I hadn't realised there were Didcot Parkway to Hanborough services.

Presumably then, when Oxford Station is finally finished and electrified, there could well be a fairly good business case for extending electrification from Wolvercot Junction to Hanborough too - especially if the latter has been rebuilt to modern specs as part of the redoubling.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2025, 16:59:57 »

 That'll be a fairly major business case!

Electrification: Didcot - Oxford/Hanborough
Second Platform Hanborough
Dualling Wolvercot - Charlbury
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page