Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:35 20 Feb 2025
 
* Starmer backs Zelensky after Trump calls him 'dictator'
- Six elephants dead after being hit by train in Sri Lanka
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Integrated Transport Strategy
27/02/25 - Portsmouth anyone?
03/03/25 - Melksham -> Inverness
06/03/25 - Go-op Crowd Funding closes

On this day
20th Feb (2016)
Final closure of Swindon panel (link)

Train RunningCancelled
09:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
10:45 Twyford to Henley-On-Thames
10:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
11:00 Henley-On-Thames to Twyford
13:48 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
19:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
08:56 Great Malvern to London Paddington
14:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Avonmouth
15:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
17:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 20, 2025, 10:45:40 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[99] Worcestershire Parkway Station project - ongoing discussion
[97] billboard for Llandegley International Airport to be removed
[94] On difficulties obtaining the fares that are in the system
[78] Proposed further redoubling (England's Economic Heartland repo...
[64] GWR Twitter reduced service
[41] Get Britain Moving - Labour's plans to fix Britain's Railways
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: Planning and taxation on non-residential housing in Cornwall and Devon  (Voting closes: February 24, 2025, 16:57:09)
Normal Council tax rates and planning permission are fine - 2 (3.8%)
Second homes should pay more council tax - 14 (26.4%)
Second homes should need extra planning permission - 11 (20.8%)
Holiday lets should pay more council tax - 11 (20.8%)
Holiday lets should need extra planning permission - 12 (22.6%)
Taxes should be lowered to encourage more visitors - 1 (1.9%)
Something else - e.g. room / tourist tax - 2 (3.8%)
Don't know / Don't care - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 17

Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Planning permission needed to use a residence as a holiday home or let  (Read 641 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43383



View Profile WWW Email
« on: February 17, 2025, 13:37:50 »

From The BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
House prices in a county where the council has introduced measures to crack down on second homes have fallen by more than 12% year-on-year, according to new figures.

The local authority in Gwynedd, north-west Wales, recently introduced a requirement to obtain planning permission to turn residential properties into second homes or holiday lets.

It is also one of a number of Welsh councils which charges a 150% council tax premium on such properties, having upped this from 100% in 2023.

The council, Cyngor Gwynedd, said its aim was to "increase the availability of high-quality, affordable homes for local people".

I understand the motivations - but is it going to also reduce the number of visitors and have a net negative effect on the economy of the area?

The news is from Wales - should similar action be taken in Cornwall and / or Devon?   Would extra taxes to put off a glut of tourists results in antagonism toward those who still came, and result is resentment at extra charges and higher prices levied on the grockles?  Would a drop in tourist make in more difficult to sustain a good public transport network in what is primarily  tourist areas?  Would it leave space on the trains (even IETs (Intercity Express Train)) for surfboards to Newquay?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13143


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2025, 13:52:30 »

Second homes aren't used by tourists....these should need planning permission & frankly 500% council tax wouldn't be too much.

Holiday lets are a different proposition. planning permission to prevent long-term occupation & holiday lets only to a max of say, 3 weeks at a time.
Logged
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2498


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2025, 14:16:56 »

Second homes aren't used by tourists....these should need planning permission & frankly 500% council tax wouldn't be too much.

500% would certainly be the final nail in the coffin for the family house that we have cherished for half a century.  I am happy to pay the forthcoming the 200% rate until I'm in a position to make it our main home again.
Logged
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 409


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2025, 14:51:00 »

All very well pricing out second home-owners, but would a local move in or would it just stay empty as lack of local employment means no-one needs to live there anyway?  Holiday lets are a bit different.  Arguably holidaymakers bring in more income to the area than a permanent resident would spend each week, plus there's employment for cleaners, tradespeople etc (in my experience they're generally maintained to a higher standard than a family home so provide regular work, and often that work will be off-season).  I've also often felt that the holiday homes I've stayed in are no longer realistic for living in permanently; a bijou (or if you're not a letting agent, cramped) cottage with little storage space, hidden up a steep narrow alley with parking 5 minutes walk away and few local services is fine for a week but many aspects would become less appealing over time.

All part of a bigger and complicated picture that I doubt will ever be fully addressed.
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2120


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2025, 14:53:39 »

I see in today's i-newspaper that one of the Welsh councils has a 150% council tax surcharge on holiday homes and letss. It is in the paper because of a 17% fall in house prices. Might be good for locals trying to get on the housing ladder, not so good for current owners.
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3539

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2025, 19:22:16 »

I’m in support of tourist tax as long as the proceeds are used correctly and potentially reduce locals council tax bills.

We pay it abroad a few euros a night without complaint, so why not charge it here too
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8509



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2025, 20:59:35 »

Our company solicitor bought a property near St Ives some years ago to use as a second home and still regularly (however less so now that he's been around a while, and spends roughly 50% of his time there) gets the (mostly lighthearted but with a bit of an edge) "bloody incomer" abuse from some of the locals.

He has pointed out that he was only be able to become an "incomer" because a local was happy to sell the house to him at an enormous profit, rather than accepting a much lower offer from one of the natives.

The Cornish tend to go a bit quiet when you mention that they have a choice over who they sell their houses to.

Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3539

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2025, 04:59:33 »

Our company solicitor bought a property near St Ives some years ago to use as a second home and still regularly (however less so now that he's been around a while, and spends roughly 50% of his time there) gets the (mostly lighthearted but with a bit of an edge) "bloody incomer" abuse from some of the locals.

He has pointed out that he was only be able to become an "incomer" because a local was happy to sell the house to him at an enormous profit, rather than accepting a much lower offer from one of the natives.

The Cornish tend to go a bit quiet when you mention that they have a choice over who they sell their houses to.



They also seem to forget that many more of us would be without work if we didn’t have our Tourists. A poor 2024 for tourists has seen several attractions closed for 2025 including the Lands open top buses.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13143


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2025, 13:23:41 »

Hmmm. Second home owners do not act like tourists..
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1769



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2025, 15:20:15 »

Quote
Hmmm. Second home owners do not act like tourists.

But - they will spend money in the local economy. I have no idea how the expenditure of the one matches the expenditure of the other. I'd guess they spend more overall out of the peak season, less by way of weekly paid employment (possibly mostly only on part-timers to check and clean their houses), but more by way of local tradesmen in repairing and maintaining their houses. They are (I'd guess) more likely to spend more when they eat out, but not eat out so often. They are also a source of custom for local attractions.



Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13143


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2025, 15:23:53 »

No more than if it were a home for a local (family)
Logged
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 666


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2025, 19:10:35 »

Notwithstanding the issue that I think this post would be better elsewhere, people need to be careful. With the elimination of the C2, D and E attractions, Flambards, Dairyland and Open top buses, tourism revenue from every available resource including those using Holiday homes and Lets must not be restricted. Cornwall needs the income, and I dismiss summarily the argument that it doesn't stay in the Duchy, from all sources. It needs to cultivate upper quartile tourism greatly going forwards. Further taxation won't help this.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1769



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2025, 21:43:08 »

Quote
No more than if it were a home for a local (family)

But that's just the problem - if there's a demand for affordable housing, it should be provided in new-purpose built housing under the planning regime, funded if required in whole or part by the public purse. It's a problem we simply have not addressed adequately in our society.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43383



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2025, 22:02:40 »

Quote
No more than if it were a home for a local (family)

But that's just the problem - if there's a demand for affordable housing, it should be provided in new-purpose built housing under the planning regime, funded if required in whole or part by the public purse. It's a problem we simply have not addressed adequately in our society.

Correct - even here in Wiltshire where we have a lower proportion of holiday homes and Melksham where I don't know of any (there are some lets), we have planning analysis in what's needed in new housing build and it includes a heavy propotion of "affordable" housing - though people laugh at the word "affordable".    Which does not totally deal with the problem ... and in any case there is still a housing shortage.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 563



View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: Yesterday at 07:40:55 »

Torbay is always in trouble over land supply in not having enough yet they have many sites, some brownfield, where no work has started and the big builders don't seem to want to build more than 150 houses a year to maintain prices and not create a glut. If councils did build more houses then builders will start pulling out or charge more to build them for the council.

Also down here many homes on these new estates seem to be bought by local authorities in the north and moving people down here so that does not help house the locals. I don't know if this is happening in more inland areas. It is a reflection of problems in seaside towns with bed and breakfast accommodation being used by outside local authorities
to house their homeless.

Torquay has some of the most expensive properties in the UK (United Kingdom) up there with Sandbanks and Salcombe, and also some of the most poorest.

Just a rant as housing supply is never going to keep up with the relentless population rise.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page