Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 01:35 19 Feb 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Integrated Transport Strategy
27/02/25 - Portsmouth anyone?
03/03/25 - Melksham -> Inverness
06/03/25 - Go-op Crowd Funding closes

On this day
19th Feb (2017)
Know your stations quiz (link)

Train RunningDelayed
21:00 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
21:40 Penzance to London Paddington
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 19, 2025, 01:41:11 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[173] Artificial daftness? (things found online that are suspiciousl...
[96] Get Britain Moving - Labour's plans to fix Britain's Railways
[87] Great Western Railway - Directors and management team (merged ...
[53] GWR Twitter reduced service
[39] Winter Tour - Melksham to Inverness - 3rd to 6th March 2025
[38] Not getting email notifications
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: "Old Worse and Worse"  (Read 665 times)
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 706



View Profile
« on: February 12, 2025, 14:16:14 »

The service between London and Worcester/Hereford truly lives up to its Old Worse and Worse name

Looking at the almost 10% cancellation rate in the most recent figures.  This compares unfavourably with the "average" amongst the so-called high-speed services of 7.7%, which is itself, very high

I think the figure for cancellations doesn't tell the whole truth, either.  If you're waiting at Evesham to go to London, but GWR (Great Western Railway) decide to start that train from Oxford that day, and not from Worcester, as far as you are concerned on the freezing platform, your train is 100% cancelled.  It doesn't show-up in the figures, though.  I don't think it would even count as a cancellation if a train starting at Worcester Foregate Street was amended to run only as far as Shrub Hill.  This has happened a couple of times in the recent past

The GWR figures for 8 December 2024 to 4 January 2025 show that 9.83 of Cotswold line services were cancelled, and a measly 52% of them ran on time
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10405


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2025, 21:23:57 »

I think the figure for cancellations doesn't tell the whole truth, either.  If you're waiting at Evesham to go to London, but GWR (Great Western Railway) decide to start that train from Oxford that day, and not from Worcester, as far as you are concerned on the freezing platform, your train is 100% cancelled.  It doesn't show-up in the figures, though.  I don't think it would even count as a cancellation if a train starting at Worcester Foregate Street was amended to run only as far as Shrub Hill.  This has happened a couple of times in the recent past

I don’t think that’s right.  AFAIK (as far as I know) they are still using the following methodology:

A train is classed as fully cancelled if it didn’t run at all, or completed less than half of its journey length.

A train is ‘part cancelled’ if it ran at least half but not all of its planned journey length, or it missed one or more stations in its planned calling pattern.

So, the figures are actually better than they look…though still pretty awful!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1275


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2025, 10:32:24 »

It feels that the main issue right now is the late afternoon/evening peak. The morning and daytime services seem to be largely ok (at this end of the line, anyway).
Logged
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1845


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2025, 17:09:23 »

This made me think of one aunt in particular, and of the nailed-up timetabled train from Paddington in that direction - loco and coaches at 16:45, which used to depart rather serenely, just in advance of most of the evening rush.

Checking Realtimetrains and yes it still runs, at 16:48, a five carriage IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) to Malvern, backed up by a 10 carriage set 40 minutes later.

Mark

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:Y22372/2025-02-13
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2071


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2025, 11:49:01 »

It feels that the main issue right now is the late afternoon/evening peak. The morning and daytime services seem to be largely ok (at this end of the line, anyway).
I agree.

I went and looked at the use of the single track section between Wolvercote and Charlbury. Hour-by-hour, the use of this is as follows:

    14:00 : 23 minutes = 38%
    15:00 : 24.5 minutes = 41%
    16:00 : 36.5 = 61%
    17:00 : 39.5 = 66%
    18:00 : 42.5 = 71%
    19:00 : 48 = 80%
    20:00 : 26.5 = 44%
    21:00 : 27.5 = 46%
    22:00 : 23.5 = 39%

The moral that I take from this is that the occupation of this section gets to be progressively more critical over the period from 16:00 to 20:00.

The big contributor to that 80% occupation figure for 19:00-20:00 is the stock of the 'halts' train, on its way back to Oxford. It's given 17.5 minutes for the single-track section.

Does it need to go back in service? Could it go back later? Could it go through to Shrub Hill and be parked ready for the next morning?

Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1275


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2025, 14:05:33 »

Oddly that train (today at least) appears to sit at Oxford for a few hours and then go off for a spin around Foxhall/Didcot West Junction. https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:Y24089/2025-02-14/detailed#allox_id=0
Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 706



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2025, 14:32:38 »

It feels that the main issue right now is the late afternoon/evening peak. The morning and daytime services seem to be largely ok (at this end of the line, anyway).
I agree.

I went and looked at the use of the single track section between Wolvercote and Charlbury. Hour-by-hour, the use of this is as follows:

    14:00 : 23 minutes = 38%
    15:00 : 24.5 minutes = 41%
    16:00 : 36.5 = 61%
    17:00 : 39.5 = 66%
    18:00 : 42.5 = 71%
    19:00 : 48 = 80%
    20:00 : 26.5 = 44%
    21:00 : 27.5 = 46%
    22:00 : 23.5 = 39%

The moral that I take from this is that the occupation of this section gets to be progressively more critical over the period from 16:00 to 20:00.

The big contributor to that 80% occupation figure for 19:00-20:00 is the stock of the 'halts' train, on its way back to Oxford. It's given 17.5 minutes for the single-track section.

Does it need to go back in service? Could it go back later? Could it go through to Shrub Hill and be parked ready for the next morning?



Ahh, great stuff

So unhelpful to have these two single track sections and constrictive junction layouts at each end of the Oxford to Worcester line

The return of "the halts" train is no longer just cars to Oxford.  It's a passenger working from Evesham to Oxford.

Whereas the cars used to sit over on the Down Refuge at Moreton in Marsh until it was time to return eastwards, the train now continues to Evesham, and forms an up service from there.

I suspect this was done to facilitate the removal of the Down Refuge at Moreton in Marsh
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2071


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2025, 15:18:02 »

Ahh, great stuff

So unhelpful to have these two single track sections and constrictive junction layouts at each end of the Oxford to Worcester line

The return of "the halts" train is no longer just cars to Oxford.  It's a passenger working from Evesham to Oxford.

Whereas the cars used to sit over on the Down Refuge at Moreton in Marsh until it was time to return eastwards, the train now continues to Evesham, and forms an up service from there.

I suspect this was done to facilitate the removal of the Down Refuge at Moreton in Marsh

It is indeed a passenger working - but does it serve any useful purpose? It departs Evesham at 18:51 and arrives Oxford at 19:50.  The one before leaves at 18:26, the one after at 19:42, so it's not exactly filling a huge gap in the timetable.
Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 706



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2025, 15:30:18 »

but does it serve any useful purpose? It departs Evesham at 18:51 and arrives Oxford at 19:50.  The one before leaves at 18:26, the one after at 19:42, so it's not exactly filling a huge gap in the timetable.

I think the useful purpose is that NR» (Network Rail - home page) may have said that they want to take out the Down Refuge siding at Moreton in Marsh.  The unit used to go in there for a while, before returning to Oxford.  By timetabling the train on to Evesham, to reverse at the West Junction, may have been GWR (Great Western Railway)'s only way of keeping this parliamentary vestige still running for the "service" at the likes of Shipton and of Ascott-under-Wychwood
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10405


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2025, 15:32:55 »

It is indeed a passenger working - but does it serve any useful purpose? It departs Evesham at 18:51 and arrives Oxford at 19:50.  The one before leaves at 18:26, the one after at 19:42, so it's not exactly filling a huge gap in the timetable.

You're certainly guaranteed a seat on it!   Cheesy  You could reduce the time it occupies the single line by a couple of minutes by removing the Hanborough stop I suppose?

The set then goes to Oxford sidings ready to form 5L80 at 22:33 which is a route refresher run for Foxhall Junction for Oxford drivers (if needed) and it then stables ovenight for the next morning.  So that would have to be balanced somehow if you sent it to Worcester for the night.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1275


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2025, 17:47:38 »

I've caught it from Charlbury to Oxford on occasion, and there's usually a handful of people on board, but only that.

The down working in the morning (Oxford–Shrub Hill, first stop Moreton) is presumably a useful service for early morning Evesham–Worcester travellers though. I guess if you stabled the unit at Worcester overnight you might also have crewing issues to contend with for the morning trains.
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2071


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2025, 09:24:32 »

The down working in the morning (Oxford–Shrub Hill, first stop Moreton) is presumably a useful service for early morning Evesham–Worcester travellers though.

That's true. The first one from Paddington only arrives at Foregate St at 08:22.  The 'halts' stock arrives at Shrub Hill at 06:17 - I would have thought that an hour or so later would have been better.

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page