Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 06 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- 'Second chance at life' after UK's first liver transplant for advanced bowel cancer
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/01/25 - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
6th Jan (1968)
Hixon Railway accident (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:36 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
Delayed
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
19:18 Trowbridge to Cardiff Central
20:22 Reading to Shalford
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:30 Shalford to Reading
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 06, 2025, 20:38:06 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Mining in Cornwall
[43] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[39] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[39] Bath to Bridgnorth and back 4/1/25
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: How would you like GWR (Great Western Railway) to handle their inability to crew all trains timetabled?  (Voting closed: November 24, 2024, 09:28:21)
Run a reduced timetable - 10 (19.6%)
Run a guaranteed train timetable with extras where possible - 12 (23.5%)
Run as many as they can on the day - 2 (3.9%)
When thinning out, remove alternate trains - 3 (5.9%)
When thinning out, run at least one every 2 hours - 7 (13.7%)
When thinning out, close services completely - 0 (0%)
I don't know - 1 (2%)
I don't mind - 0 (0%)
It's more complicated - 16 (31.4%)
Total Voters: 35

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
Author Topic: How would you like GWR to handle their inability to crew all trains timetabled?  (Read 6720 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 17, 2024, 09:26:25 »

I am assured that Melksham is getting just the same treatment as other places with train cancellations and indeed when I look at the graphics our web site produces, it looks as bad or worse elsewhere.

Problem is that "cancel one round trip every 2 hours" as a thinning out policy reduces services to Barnstaple, and via Stroud, to a service that runs every 2 hours.  Via Melksham, it eliminates the service; yesterday, (and that was a Saturday!), nothing called headed in the Westbury direction from 11:30 until 21:37, and in the Swindon direction from 10:08 until 14:47, and then again until 20:24.

Would a policy of "never have more than about an hour to wait if the train you want is cancelled" would be much more customer focused?   Should GWR (Great Western Railway) be running a reduced weekend timetable?  Should they be declaring certain trains as "strategic" ones to maintain at-least-one-every-2-hours then running what they can of the rest?

Speaking with a key contact at GWR this week, I understand that GWR are not running a reduced timetable for a while if they can possibly avoid it, but that is a decision which has been a difficult one for them - no obvious choice as to whether to do that or not.  Sadly, I am not aware of any consultation with passengers in this significant decision.  Your views, please.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2024, 09:42:11 »

Quote
Speaking with a key contact at GWR (Great Western Railway) this week, I understand that GWR are not running a reduced timetable for a while if they can possibly avoid it, but that is a decision which has been a difficult one for them - no obvious choice as to whether to do that or not.

To continue with cancelling/short running hundreds of trains EVERY weekend rather than produce a timetable that GWR can actually run to me seems absolutely crazy and totally unpassenger friendly.

It’s obvious to any one observing the current situation that this issue of not enough train crew to run the current timetable, not just on Sundays but now Saturdays, isn’t going to go away for a long time.

So I say REVISED TIMETABLE FOR WEEKENDS NOW!
Logged
Fourbee
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 701


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2024, 10:21:57 »

I'm reminded of Covid era timetabling where frequency across routes were slashed, but were still subject to cancellations for all the other usual reasons creating even larger gaps between services. I've reluctantly voted to leave things as they are, but fully understand that this unreliability is driving (literally) people away, especially at weekends.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2024, 10:25:34 »

To continue with cancelling/short running hundreds of trains EVERY weekend rather than produce a timetable that GWR (Great Western Railway) can actually run to me seems absolutely crazy and totally unpassenger friendly.

[snip]

So I say REVISED TIMETABLE FOR WEEKENDS NOW!

If that turns out to be the overwhelming view of this poll, and with a significant number of votes, we will be in a strong position to give customer feedback to GWR, and to help them change to that policy by letting those who control their string know the passenger view.


Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2024, 10:51:12 »

It’s not that I want to see less trains running on weekends, I just want to see a timetable that is more reliable that matches the staff resources available until such time that GWR (Great Western Railway)/GBR (Great British Railways) have a enough staff to run the current timetable. It’s crystal clear at the moment that they don’t.
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1105


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2024, 11:38:58 »

Traincrew availability on a Sunday will fluctuate considerably, especially in the run up to Christmas.

It would be impossible to run a reduced timetable and guarantee services would run.

Logged
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1797


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2024, 12:32:03 »

I'm reminded of Covid era timetabling where frequency across routes were slashed, but were still subject to cancellations for all the other usual reasons creating even larger gaps between services. I've reluctantly voted to leave things as they are, but fully understand that this unreliability is driving (literally) people away, especially at weekends.

That's made me recall that another issue with Covid era timetabling (on rail and buses) is the services that disappeared and were never reinstated. If a temporary timetable is introduced there must be ways of ensuring that it's not the trojan horse for what is actually a spiral  of decline.

Mark
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2024, 12:54:17 »

I'm reminded of Covid era timetabling where frequency across routes were slashed, but were still subject to cancellations for all the other usual reasons creating even larger gaps between services. I've reluctantly voted to leave things as they are, but fully understand that this unreliability is driving (literally) people away, especially at weekends.

That's made me recall that another issue with Covid era timetabling (on rail and buses) is the services that disappeared and were never reinstated. If a temporary timetable is introduced there must be ways of ensuring that it's not the trojan horse for what is actually a spiral  of decline.

Mark

Those are utterly two fears of a reduced timetable.  There is no easy answer.  "Pop down to the job centre for a few more [temporary]  staff" is not an option, offer incentives to have the skilled people work when they are reluctant is close to its limit (and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) authority to do so is - err - difficult).

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13019


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2024, 13:00:03 »

Traincrew availability on a Sunday will fluctuate considerably, especially in the run up to Christmas.

It would be impossible to run a reduced timetable and guarantee services would run.

This. Drivers volunteer to work Sundays, so a reduced timetable still needs volunteers on the day.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2024, 14:01:15 »

Traincrew availability on a Sunday will fluctuate considerably, especially in the run up to Christmas.

It would be impossible to run a reduced timetable and guarantee services would run.

This. Drivers volunteer to work Sundays, so a reduced timetable still needs volunteers on the day.
So we stick to the current fantasy timetable that will never fully operate because GWR (Great Western Railway)/GBR (Great British Railways) will never get enough staff to volunteer to work Sundays? Crazy. What a way to run a service. It’s pathetic.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13019


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2024, 15:35:40 »

Bringing Sundays into the working week is the only solution to guarantee staff on a Sunday
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19072


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2024, 15:39:10 »

Drivers volunteer to work Sundays, so a reduced timetable still needs volunteers on the day.

Yes, but a reduced timetable would require fewer of them to actually volunteer - making it more realistic.  Lips sealed

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13019


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2024, 15:44:44 »

Indeed, but you'll still get cancellations when not enough do....
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8449



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 17, 2024, 16:16:24 »

Bringing Sundays into the working week is the only solution to guarantee staff on a Sunday

And this illustrates the utter folly of the new Government caving in to the Unions demands without at least getting it on the table & moving forward with it.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19072


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: November 17, 2024, 16:25:35 »

The voting by Coffee Shop forum members so far is interesting: if you haven't, please do vote!  Smiley

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page