Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 21:33:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Cotswold Line ORR approval  (Read 8157 times)
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« on: June 05, 2008, 13:54:19 »

Oxford Mail article

http://www.thisisoxfordshire.co.uk/display.var.2321572.0.cotswold_line_dualling_goahead.php

A SECTION of the Cotswold railway line in Oxfordshire is to be dualled, Oxfordshire County
Council transport chiefs have been told today.

The Office of Rail Regulation has confirmed to Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly that it has approved
the funding - meaning that the final obstacle has been cleared, allowing Network Rail to lay 20 miles
of new track between Charlbury and Evesham, including the section from Charlbury to Ascott-under-Wychwood.

The Cotswold Line was reduced to a single track in many places by British Rail in the early 1970s.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2008, 17:57:54 »

Oxford Mail article

http://www.thisisoxfordshire.co.uk/display.var.2321572.0.cotswold_line_dualling_goahead.php

A SECTION of the Cotswold railway line in Oxfordshire is to be dualled, Oxfordshire County
Council transport chiefs have been told today.

The Office of Rail Regulation has confirmed to Transport Secretary Ruth Kelly that it has approved
the funding - meaning that the final obstacle has been cleared, allowing Network Rail to lay 20 miles
of new track between Charlbury and Evesham, including the section from Charlbury to Ascott-under-Wychwood.

The Cotswold Line was reduced to a single track in many places by British Rail in the early 1970s.

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

If you have yet to sign the petition - there is no need!

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Logged
Andy W
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2008, 18:38:44 »

Great news,

But this is not so good ......... http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/3bn+funding+cut+for+network+rail/2271972 Huh
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2008, 21:28:23 »

No: see also http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7437334.stm  Angry
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2008, 21:51:08 »

You wouldn't believe the headline on the Rail Regulator's website:-

ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) announces a package of measures to improve railway services

More spin than in a box full of old 78s.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2008, 21:55:41 »

More spin than in a box full of old 78s.

Showing our age, but some of our younger readers may not understand that one, John!  Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2008, 22:17:25 »

http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/NewsItem.aspx?id=596

Also announced on FGW (First Great Western)'s website.

A 78? What came before downloads, then CD (Capital Delivery)'s, then LPs/singles. And then you're before my time (honest!)

Nothing beats a Linn Sondek in my opinion. The original, the best, and still made.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2008, 22:23:55 »

Thanks, John!  You're quite right - and I'm really feeling my age now!  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2008, 22:51:57 »

Quote
Great news,

But this is not so good .........

What this is all about is the issue of Network's Rail efficiency when it comes to spending money - and there is a widespread view within the industry that they have a long way to go to get costs down to the level of best practice in the US and Europe - and a lot of projects NR» (Network Rail - home page) wants to implement that ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) doesn't view as essential to meet the requirements that the Government set out in its High Level Output Statement, which says what kind of a railway it wants to get for its money.

I have put a link in the 'More Good News' thread to the ORR documentation. Page 368 there includes a list of non-funded schemes at this stage, including Kemble-Swindon double track and Didcot-Oxford capacity enhancements.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2008, 22:53:51 »

Surely it would be more efficient to close the line for a larger block of time, such as a week and get hundreds of staff in to complete the job in one?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2008, 23:02:36 »

Well, that might work ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7195418.stm  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2008, 00:25:19 »

Quote
Surely it would be more efficient to close the line for a larger block of time, such as a week and get hundreds of staff in to complete the job in one?

As previously discussed in the feature of the month thread, there will certainly be a blockade between Moreton-in-Marsh and Evesham - latest suggestion I have heard is this could be up to six months.

Chris Bates, who is the FGW (First Great Western) Customer Panel member for Banbury/Kingham to Oxford and Appleton has posted the following at Charlbury.info:

I have already discussed this with Network Rail & FGW and I am quietly confident that meetings to inform all on this line WILL be held locally well in advance of any works being started -- indeed, as soon as I have dates from NR» (Network Rail - home page), I will bring them here to enable everyone to plan holidays etc around the disruption.

NR will be working up the detail of this scheme over the coming weeks and possibly months - but I will stay in touch with both FGW and NR, and will report back as soon as there is more to impart.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2008, 00:55:58 »

Quote
Great news,

But this is not so good .........

What this is all about is the issue of Network's Rail efficiency when it comes to spending money - and there is a widespread view within the industry that they have a long way to go to get costs down to the level of best practice in the US and Europe - and a lot of projects NR» (Network Rail - home page) wants to implement that ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) doesn't view as essential to meet the requirements that the Government set out in its High Level Output Statement, which says what kind of a railway it wants to get for its money.

I have put a link in the 'More Good News' thread to the ORR documentation. Page 368 there includes a list of non-funded schemes at this stage, including Kemble-Swindon double track and Didcot-Oxford capacity enhancements.

Related link.
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/forum/index.php?topic=7761.msg12493#msg12493
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2008, 02:48:57 »

Rival infrastructure company will lead to another Potters Bar, I reckon.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2008, 01:25:33 »

Oxford Mail article link on Cotswold line scheme approval.
http://www.oxfordmail.net/news/headlines/display.var.2325582.0.commuters_hail_rail_line_boost.php
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page