Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 03 Apr 2025
 
* Luton airport expansion approved by government
- Ship and tanker in North Sea crash had no lookouts, report finds
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 15/04/25 - End, Rail Future consultation
15/04/25 - Everything Electric
16/04/25 - Walk from Chetnole
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury

On this day
3rd Apr (1944)
Wick and Lybster Railway closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:30 Greenford to West Ealing
16:45 West Ealing to Greenford
16:55 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:00 Greenford to West Ealing
17:15 West Ealing to Greenford
17:30 Greenford to West Ealing
17:45 West Ealing to Greenford
18:00 Greenford to West Ealing
18:15 West Ealing to Greenford
18:30 Greenford to West Ealing
18:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:45 West Ealing to Greenford
19:00 Greenford to West Ealing
19:15 West Ealing to Greenford
19:30 Greenford to West Ealing
19:45 West Ealing to Greenford
20:00 Greenford to West Ealing
20:15 West Ealing to Greenford
20:30 Greenford to West Ealing
20:45 West Ealing to Greenford
21:00 Greenford to West Ealing
21:15 West Ealing to Greenford
21:31 Greenford to West Ealing
21:45 West Ealing to Greenford
22:03 Greenford to London Paddington
Short Run
14:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
15:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
15:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
15:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
15:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:07 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
16:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
21:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
21:56 Newbury to London Paddington
22:36 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
16:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 03, 2025, 16:39:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] 185 years of Reading Station
[80] Daily Mile - coming to Melksham for April
[75] [OTD] Senior Railcard launched 1st April 1975
[44] Nottingham to Bristol TM open access service proposed
[36] On this day. South Australia's triple decker train experiment.
[34] [OTD] 2nd April 1962 - First Panda Crossing
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: It's NOT the age of the train  (Read 4146 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43735



View Profile WWW Email
« on: September 07, 2024, 13:03:28 »

It is not [about] the age of the train. Some folks bemoan that we don't have new trains on the line through Melksham, or indeed anywhere on local and regional services in the South West - but does that really matter?  If someone says to you "I'm not going on that train because it was made in the last millennium" are they really saying something else like "it's not clean" or "it's not comfortable"?

I have come up with a personal scoring system as to what makes an ideal train service and come up with values for each of the factors.  You may argue the numbers or eve some of the categories, but you can't argue my personal sentiment.   

(Mention MKM» (Melksham (Station code) - next trains) SWI» (Swindon - next trains) and PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) to get formatting right)

Code:
			Ideal	MKM-SWI	SWI-PAD
Appropriate timetable 15 10 15
Reliable 15 7 14
Safe 25 25 25
Clean 15 14 15
Comfortable 15 13 13
Affordable 15 15 12
Age of Train n/a n/a n/a

Added together, you get 84/100 (84%) for Melksham to Swindon and 94/100 (94%) for Swindon to Paddington.   But wait a moment - the factors interact and perhaps we should multiply them together?   I'm not going to travel train if I think it's unsafe. And then you get a very different score - of 64% for Swindon to Paddington and just 25% from Melksham to Swindon.

Rather sadly, I think the (dis)satisfaction I see at present is more accurately reflected in the multiplication, but the marketing hype from those who want to convince us that all is not all THAT bad tends to be addative.

The other thing to note - no matter how much you tweak the price and the cleanliness, you MUST tackle reliability and the appropriateness of the timetable to get the sentiment and use right
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5663



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2024, 18:08:09 »

To me, the important factors are in order,
1) Train length/capacity, should be ample even for events like holidays.
2) Comfort and facilities, decent legroom, padded seats, luggage space, catering.
3) Reliability, a nasty short train that turns up is better than a longer one that does not.

Safety is in my view at or near the bottom of the list. UK (United Kingdom) train travel is already very safe, and minor differences between one type of train and another matter little to me.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page