Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:22 Reading to Shalford
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 21:16:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[201] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[107] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[68] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[53] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[44] senior railcard
[43] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46 ... 53
  Print  
Author Topic: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2018  (Read 13417 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #645 on: October 18, 2018, 20:13:06 »

Meanwhile...

From what I can gather from GWR (Great Western Railway)'s Twitter feed, for the past 30 minutes the IET (Intercity Express Train) on 1C27 1900 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) has been blocking the DM at TWY (Twyford station) (having made an extra stop there due to other cancellations) because of an apparent loss of power. RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) and OTT (Open Train Times website) both appear to confirm that it's currently going nowhere.

Brakes stuck on and losing air.

Sounds familiar...
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #646 on: October 18, 2018, 20:19:40 »

On the move again at 2012 after a Train Management System reset*.



*Driver must have called the IET (Intercity Express Train) Crowd:
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #647 on: October 18, 2018, 20:34:36 »

I wonder if the references to the speed of “105 mph” are just based on the typical speed reached at that particular location if accelerating away from the buffers at Paddington?

Paul
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #648 on: October 18, 2018, 20:48:17 »

Meanwhile...

From what I can gather from GWR (Great Western Railway)'s Twitter feed, for the past 30 minutes the IET (Intercity Express Train) on 1C27 1900 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) has been blocking the DM at TWY (Twyford station) (having made an extra stop there due to other cancellations) because of an apparent loss of power. RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) and OTT (Open Train Times website) both appear to confirm that it's currently going nowhere.

Computer says you should not have stopped 'ere.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #649 on: October 18, 2018, 20:50:54 »

Something very wrong with the software if a Special Stop Order causes the train to dump its air.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7370


View Profile
« Reply #650 on: October 18, 2018, 20:51:51 »

Some speculation across rail related forums and social media that the pantograph was tied down at the head end and it was the elbow that raised. Either commanded or uncommanded. Speculated to have been left tied down after transit from the factory in Italy.

However, there is YouTube footage of 802016 running with pan up at Reading on 3rd October. 802016 has been in the UK (United Kingdom) since 28th August. Hard to believe the pantograph would still be in delivery tied down status.

More to the point, that video shows 802016 on its own. Most of the 802s I've seen on test have been paired, and it was just possible a pantograph on an inner end might have been left retained. But the likelihood of it doing only one move A-B on the 3rd and otherwise always being paired when using 25kV is so low it can be deleted from the list.

There's an "after" picture of the pantograph on RailUKForums, showing the head end badly mangled, but I can't see the arm in that. That would have been the front end at the time of the incident, so unless it left Paddington on diesel (why?) it would have been raised already (at least normally, I'm sure the rear one can be raised if you want to). None of which really fits the explanations currently offered.
Logged
Incider
Transport Scholar
Full Member
******
Posts: 98


View Profile
« Reply #651 on: October 18, 2018, 22:15:13 »

[quote author=bignosemac link=topic=14689.msg249138#msg249138 date=1539888667

There's also some contention over the speed the train was running at. Could an 802 have reached 105mph on diesel by the time it was at the incident location? [/quote]

Whether it could or not, it hadn’t reached 105mph.

Edit - there appears to have been some quoting slip of the fingers - hope I have corrected who said what now - Grahame
« Last Edit: October 19, 2018, 18:35:12 by grahame » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #652 on: October 18, 2018, 23:34:26 »

But it was going at way more than 20mph which would be the maximum speed to pan up at that location.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Incider
Transport Scholar
Full Member
******
Posts: 98


View Profile
« Reply #653 on: October 18, 2018, 23:47:49 »

But it was going at way more than 20mph which would be the maximum speed to pan up at that location.

It was, but not the widely publicised 105mph. Closer to half that.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4496


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #654 on: October 19, 2018, 18:16:34 »



There's also some contention over the speed the train was running at. Could an 802 have reached 105mph on diesel by the time it was at the incident location?



Whether it could or not, it hadn’t reached 105mph.

I've been miss quoted!!!!!

Edit - looks like there have indeed been some quoting errors - which I have tried to fix - Grahame
(Goodness only knows if I have got them right now - but at least I have planted a flag of caution for future readers!

Thanks Graham  Grin

« Last Edit: October 19, 2018, 18:54:19 by Electric train » Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8450



View Profile
« Reply #655 on: October 28, 2018, 13:10:21 »

Here we go again.......

Cancellations to services between London Paddington and Slough
Due to damage to the overhead electric wires between London Paddington and Slough all lines are blocked.
Impact:
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled, delayed by up to 60 minutes or revised. Disruption is expected until 18:00 28/10.
Customer Advice:
Due to damage to the overhead electric wires between London Paddington and Reading all lines are closed.
Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled, delayed or revised. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.
Customer Advice
Since around 11:30am Sunday morning,virtually no train service has been able to operate between London Paddington and Reading in either direction owing to the damage to the overhead wires. This has led to widespread disruption with trains initially stranded in various.

The position this afternoon is that all lines remain closed between London Paddington and Slough
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10167



View Profile
« Reply #656 on: October 28, 2018, 13:13:44 »

Reports of some passengers taking it upon themselves to operate emergency door releases and spilling out onto the track near Ladbroke Grove.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #657 on: October 28, 2018, 13:45:58 »

Not going to help the situation that one option for those travelling to the SW today isn’t easily available in that Waterloo to Exeter services are starting/terminating at Basingstoke due to engineering work in the Woking area.

My wife was due to travel home from London this afternoon but we’ve decided she is better off staying put and travel tomorrow. Someone reporting on uk Rail Forums that Waterloo is already busy with those arriving from Paddington.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #658 on: October 28, 2018, 13:48:33 »

GWR (Great Western Railway) now reporting signalling problems at Bristol Parkway now. For those who have to travel this afternoon I wish you all the best, it’s not looking good.
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2037


View Profile
« Reply #659 on: October 28, 2018, 13:50:42 »

Not going to help the situation that one option for those travelling to the SW today isn’t easily available in that Waterloo to Exeter services are starting/terminating at Basingstoke due to engineering work in the Woking area.

Someone needs to tell GWR (Great Western Railway)'s Journeycheck team. It's currently saying
Quote
Customers travelling to destinations in Devon and Cornwall are advised to travel via London Waterloo either to Reading or via Salisbury to interchange with West Country services at Exeter St Davids.
An update will follow within the next 2 hours.
Last Updated:28/10/2018 13:41
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 42 43 [44] 45 46 ... 53
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page