Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:35 22 Feb 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 27/02/25 - Portsmouth anyone?
03/03/25 - Melksham -> Inverness
06/03/25 - Go-op Crowd Funding closes
06/03/25 - Inverness -> Melksham

On this day
22nd Feb (2011)
GoCo proposal - class 50 Yeovil to Oxford (link)

Train RunningCancelled
14:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:12 Oxford to Bristol Temple Meads
17:26 Looe to Liskeard
17:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:10 Gloucester to Westbury
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:08 Weston-Super-Mare to Bristol Temple Meads
20:43 Penzance to Plymouth
21:35 Reading to Gatwick Airport
22:16 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
22:57 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:08 Didcot Parkway to Reading
23:23 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
13:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
18:42 Salisbury to Cardiff Central
19:01 Severn Beach to Frome
19:56 Taunton to London Paddington
20:03 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:00 Cardiff Central to Exeter St Davids
21:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
21:42 Salisbury to Cardiff Central
21:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
22:00 Oxford to London Paddington
22:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
22:57 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 London Paddington to Oxford
Delayed
15:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
February 22, 2025, 17:47:52 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[117] Brighton's last 1900s tram could return to service in 2025
[95] St Pancras plans for direct trains from UK to Germany - Feb 20...
[64] North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
[58] Defibrillators on traiins
[46] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Is it April 1st already ??
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Derailment near Walton-on-Thames, 4th March 2024  (Read 2926 times)
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19284



View Profile
« on: March 04, 2024, 15:57:38 »

There is major disruption to the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) network following the derailment of a passenger train near Walton-on-Thames this morning, 4th March 2024.

The incident involved 2L10 0454 Basingstoke - London Waterloo. 2x four car Class 450s. Front wheelset derailed after hitting, it's believed, a displaced conductor rail. Significant damage has been caused to the infrastructure. No reported injuries to passengers or staff, all were safely evacuated. This was the first train through the area after overnight engineering work. The RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) are on site.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2024, 18:11:59 by Mark A » Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13156


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2024, 15:59:02 »

Train was doing 90mph at the time.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2024, 18:12:28 by Mark A » Logged
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19284



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2024, 16:07:23 »

Pictures from Network Rail Wessex on Twitter.





« Last Edit: March 04, 2024, 18:12:43 by Mark A » Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1845


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2024, 18:14:26 »

Sounds as though it came to rest partly alongside an out-of-use platform at Walton and the passengers evacuated via the platform's stairs, which are covered by a rather informal corrugated structure.

Mark
Logged
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19284



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2024, 22:02:33 »

The train was re-railed late afternoon and removed from the area late evening. Wheelskates were used due to damage to leading bogie, and a diesel loco employed to haul the set away. Work continues into the night to repair the infrastructure.


https://twitter.com/NetworkRailWssx/status/1764727055457882179
« Last Edit: March 04, 2024, 22:19:40 by JayMac » Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8514



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2024, 06:48:06 »

Network Rail didn't clean up after themselves it would seem and left equipment on the tracks for the train to hit.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5340


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2024, 16:14:23 »

Network Rail didn't clean up after themselves it would seem and left equipment on the tracks for the train to hit.
That was my initial thoughts as well, but has there been any more info about what happened made public at all?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4511


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2024, 18:13:23 »

Network Rail didn't clean up after themselves it would seem and left equipment on the tracks for the train to hit.
That was my initial thoughts as well, but has there been any more info about what happened made public at all?

Not that I'm aware of.  If it was caused by something NR» (Network Rail - home page) or their contractors did or didn't do or by vandals it will be part of an investigation by the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about), RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) and potentially BTP (British Transport Police) as such a statement will be made to the public when they are ready to release it.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43405



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2024, 21:45:28 »

Network Rail didn't clean up after themselves it would seem and left equipment on the tracks for the train to hit.
That was my initial thoughts as well, but has there been any more info about what happened made public at all?

Not that I'm aware of.  If it was caused by something NR» (Network Rail - home page) or their contractors did or didn't do or by vandals it will be part of an investigation by the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about), RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) and potentially BTP (British Transport Police) as such a statement will be made to the public when they are ready to release it.

In public now ... BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
Scrap rail left on tracks following engineering works was the cause of a derailment in Surrey, according to Network Rail.

The company said a train hit the object at about 05:50 GMT on Monday in a 90mph area near Walton-on-Thames.

A Network Rail Wessex safety bulletin said it was the first train on the fast line following the weekend works.

The incident initially closed four tracks between Woking and Surbiton before disruption spread across the South Western Railway (SWR» (South Western Railway - about)) network for 24 hours.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8514



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2024, 07:56:48 »

Network Rail didn't clean up after themselves it would seem and left equipment on the tracks for the train to hit.
That was my initial thoughts as well, but has there been any more info about what happened made public at all?

Not that I'm aware of.  If it was caused by something NR» (Network Rail - home page) or their contractors did or didn't do or by vandals it will be part of an investigation by the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about), RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) and potentially BTP (British Transport Police) as such a statement will be made to the public when they are ready to release it.

In public now ... BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
Scrap rail left on tracks following engineering works was the cause of a derailment in Surrey, according to Network Rail.

The company said a train hit the object at about 05:50 GMT on Monday in a 90mph area near Walton-on-Thames.

A Network Rail Wessex safety bulletin said it was the first train on the fast line following the weekend works.

The incident initially closed four tracks between Woking and Surbiton before disruption spread across the South Western Railway (SWR» (South Western Railway - about)) network for 24 hours.

Very, very lucky. Could've been carnage.

Doesn't anyone check for things like this before leaving site?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4511


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2024, 08:07:58 »

Network Rail didn't clean up after themselves it would seem and left equipment on the tracks for the train to hit.
That was my initial thoughts as well, but has there been any more info about what happened made public at all?

Not that I'm aware of.  If it was caused by something NR» (Network Rail - home page) or their contractors did or didn't do or by vandals it will be part of an investigation by the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about), RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) and potentially BTP (British Transport Police) as such a statement will be made to the public when they are ready to release it.

In public now ... BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
Scrap rail left on tracks following engineering works was the cause of a derailment in Surrey, according to Network Rail.

The company said a train hit the object at about 05:50 GMT on Monday in a 90mph area near Walton-on-Thames.

A Network Rail Wessex safety bulletin said it was the first train on the fast line following the weekend works.

The incident initially closed four tracks between Woking and Surbiton before disruption spread across the South Western Railway (SWR» (South Western Railway - about)) network for 24 hours.

I was aware of the cause Tuesday morning.

It would seem to be such a simple thing not to leave anything on the track after work; there is an inordinate amount of processes and procedures designed to prevent such things happening.  

Most if not all of the processes and procedures relies on the person in charge of a work site checking and reporting back to the person in charge of the possession their work site is clear of all tools, material, machines, personnel etc and its safe to hand back.
The person in charge of the possession will have multiple worksites all doing different work over often a very large length of railway, the work load on this person has increased since the prohibition on the use of unassisted lookouts to do work in normal traffic running, this has pushed more routine maintenance and inspection activities into engineering possessions.
 
There is the pressure to hand back the possession on time so as not to delay train services.

(A possession is the term used when a Engineering Department take over a section of railway from the Operations Department.  The person in charge of the possession is responsible for the setting up and handing back processes of the possession, controls all engineering train movements into and out the possession and authorises engineering train movements between work sites)

I would think the ORR and RAIB will be looking into the processes and procedures of handing back a possession.
 
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7392


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2024, 15:49:22 »

To no-one's surprise, RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) have announced an investigation.

Quote
At around 05:40 hrs on 4 March 2024, a passenger train, travelling along the Up Fast line between Woking and London Waterloo, struck a piece of redundant rail on a railway access point on the approach to Walton‑on‑Thames station. The train was travelling at around 85 mph (137 km/h) when the collision occurred.

The train’s leading set of wheels derailed, but the train remained upright and came to a stand around 500 metres beyond the point of collision, as a result of the driver applying the emergency brake. There were no injuries, but the train and several hundred metres of railway infrastructure were damaged.

The train was the first one along the Up Fast line following engineering work that had taken place the previous weekend. This work included recovering redundant rails.

Our investigation will seek to identify the sequence of events that led to the accident. It will also consider:

    the planning and management of the work to recover the redundant rails
    the arrangements to ensure railway lines are safe for the passage of trains following engineering work
    the actions of those involved and anything which may have influenced them
    any underlying management factors.

Logged
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19284



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2025, 22:45:23 »

The RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) released it's report into this incident yesterday, 17th February 2025.

Two recommendations were made:
Quote
As a result of its investigation, RAIB has made two recommendations. The first is addressed to Colas Rail (in consultation with Network Rail), to review its processes related to collecting redundant material when working on or near the line. The second is addressed to Network Rail (in consultation with the Rail Safety and Standards Board) to review the rules and standards relating to how tasks delivered in complex work sites should be co‑ordinated and supervised and to create a coherent process for confirming that the line is safe for the passage of trains after the work is complete.

Additionally, two learning points have been identified. The first reinforces the importance of infrastructure maintainers arranging adequate site lighting. The second concerns the importance of railway organisations ensuring that guidance material relating to superseded standards is removed from resource libraries when new standards are issued.

Andrew Hall, Chief Inspector of Rail Accidents said:

"Following a passenger train striking redundant rail on the track in 2018, RAIB issued Urgent Safety Advice to Network Rail regarding safety of the line after engineering work. Since this advice was issued, RAIB has examined a number of further accidents caused by objects, including temporary road-rail access points and a trolley, being left on the track after the completion of maintenance work. These accidents caused damage to the railway infrastructure, the trains involved and resulted in temporary closures to the affected lines. This most recent accident at Walton-on-Thames resulted in a passenger train derailing at speed. Although no one was hurt on this occasion, the train could easily have deviated from the line of the track and struck other trains or objects.

Maintenance work is often carried out at night which makes ensuring the line is subsequently safe for the passage of trains particularly challenging. The risk is very clear. Unfortunately, this accident happened because that risk was not effectively managed. This, following other similar recent incidents, should serve as a stark reminder of the importance of effectively managing the risk of objects being left on the track after overnight maintenance."

The full report can be downloaded and read here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/report-042025-derailment-of-a-passenger-train-near-walton-on-thames
« Last Edit: February 18, 2025, 23:36:17 by JayMac » Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page