Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 01:35 07 Jan 2025
 
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
7th Jan (1957)
Closure of Upwey Wishing Well Halt (link)

Train RunningDelayed
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 07, 2025, 01:40:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[82] senior railcard
[59] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Coastal walks - station to station
[49] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[34] Mining in Cornwall
[25] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Project Churchward - Future regional fleet for the west  (Read 10090 times)
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4495


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2024, 18:17:45 »

I am a bit doubtful about claims made for ultra-fast charging from a standard 400 volt, 3 phase supply.
The greatest load that can be connected to an existing substation is often about 315 amps or 400 amps, presuming that the substation has enough spare capacity. If insufficient capacity is available then a new substation will be required.

More than 315 or 400 amps will require a new substation, that could if desired be at the higher voltage of 690 volts (three phase, 4 wire systems at 400 volts phase to neutral and 690 volts between phases are catching on in industry, so the transformer will be readily available.)

400 amps at three phase 400 volts is about 276 kilowatts, perhaps a bit more in practice as the actual voltage supplied tends to be at least 415 volts.
276 kw will take at least a few hours to charge a reasonable size battery train. In the case of a 2,000kwh battery then 276 kw input will take about 9 hours, fine for overnight charging but limited for charging in service.

Use of multiple batteries each intended for an electric car may have the merits of competitive price due to the mass production of these batteries.


I believe the "fast charging" system at West Ealing is basically "pump storage" an 11kV / 400V substation charges a set of line side batteries which provide the high current to charge to train; the line side batteries being charged at a slower rate between train charging.

There was (may still even be) a proposal to use battery trains on the Marsh Link (Ashford - Hastings) the train batteries being charged when the contact the 750V third rail at each end.  Sounds like a good idea however the fast charging current would mean a new 3 1/2 MW substation to be built at each end.

Battery trains are expensive in terms of line side infrastructure to fast charge them   
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7368


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 03, 2024, 19:44:27 »

I've found what was behind the article: Siemens put out a kind of flyer about their battery trains today. Presumably The Times got that in advance.
Quote
Siemens’ British battery trains set to save £3.5bn and consign diesel trains to history
  •     Siemens Mobility's battery trains, to be assembled in Goole, Yorkshire could replace aging diesel fleets for the likes of Chiltern, Great Western Railway (GWR (Great Western Railway)), Northern, ScotRail, TransPennine Express (TPE (Trans Pennine Express)) and Transport for Wales (TfW) and run on East-West Rail, within the next decade.
  •     Only small sections of track would need to be electrified, with fast-charging at key points on routes supplied from the domestic grid via Siemens’ innovative Rail Charging Converters (RCCs).
  •     This would save £3.5 billion and 12million tonnes in CO2 emissions for Britain’s railways over 35 years.

They have been promoting the Verve as a 200 km/h Desiro for nearly ten years, and don't appear to have sold any. They offer all cars motored except those with pantograph and battery (or hydrogen fuel cell). The article cited them (with batteries) as just gone into service in Germany, but those are branded Mireo B plus and are for 160 km/h. All a bit puzzling, especially for the GWR and other DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) replacements where 200 km/h is not needed.

I'm still none the wiser about what they mean by "domestic grid". It sounds like they are saying you can avoid the delay and expense of getting a "traditional" national grid supply for OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE"), but then they aren't the only ones who could do that for a small section. Here's another quote on this:
Quote
That means only small sections of the routes and/or particular stations have to be electrified with overhead line equipment (OLE), making it much quicker and less disruptive to replace diesel trains compared to full electrification. 

This OLE can also be installed much more quickly using Siemens Mobility’s innovative Rail Charging Converter (RCC), which makes it possible to plug directly into the domestic grid – potentially cutting delivery times for OLE from seven years to as little as 18 months.

I'm guessing it's a small SFC fed at 11 or 33 kV. I have seen nothing to suggest they offer buffer battery storage at trackside.
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: June 20, 2024, 13:29:19 »

If Filton Bank is wired perhaps see if batteries could be fitted to class 350/2's to use on the Cardiff to Portsmouth Harbour services.

Meanwhile looks like GWR (Great Western Railway) will be having 20 kass 175 units
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43053



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: June 20, 2024, 14:46:54 »

Meanwhile looks like GWR (Great Western Railway) will be having 20 kass 175 units

Class 175 were introduced in 1997; coupling system: Scharfenberg Type 330. So yet another set of older trains that can't couple to others cascaded after they're superceded by something new on the "important" lines they were built for.

Having said that, yes please ... 20 "new" units would be great, provided that they add substantially to the reliable available carriage count on GWR.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: June 20, 2024, 16:04:23 »

If Class 175s arrive then it will be a reasonably short-term thing of 5 or so years, until this new generation of stock is built and enters service.

The stock would be most useful in that respect, even if not the perfect fit for a few reasons.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 20, 2024, 16:40:55 »

Class 175s. Roll Eyes

Did GWR (Great Western Railway) learn nothing from their terrible experience with the Class 180s from the same Alstom Coradia family? They should steer well clear.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 20, 2024, 17:18:36 »

That was one of my reasons against!

GWR (Great Western Railway) will have sod all say in the matter though sadly.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1105


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: June 20, 2024, 17:24:34 »

Class 175s. Roll Eyes

Did GWR (Great Western Railway) learn nothing from their terrible experience with the Class 180s from the same Alstom Coradia family? They should steer well clear.


Beggars can’t be choosers.
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: July 04, 2024, 21:38:56 »

Looks like next few weeks should see a 175 making its way to laira  depot
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: July 05, 2024, 17:42:51 »

Looks like next few weeks should see a 175 making its way to laira  depot

With a plan for more to follow?
Logged

Now, please!
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: July 05, 2024, 18:17:16 »

Very quick work by the new government!  Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: July 13, 2024, 22:35:04 »

It's been posted on other railway forums and I've asked one member of gwr staff I know  that I know and they've also said its happening but there's been a memo from aslef to their members at GWR (Great Western Railway) that all 27 class 175s will be heading west soon.

Hopefully if the plan remains as I wad told the units would be based mainly at laira  but will also be put on Exeter to Barnstaple and Okehampton services to free up class 150/158's
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: July 16, 2024, 12:29:04 »

I wonder if they'll keep the names. Seeing "Valhalla - Blackpool Pleasure Beach" or "Eisteddfod Genedlaethol Cymru" rumbling through Crediton would be a novelty, although I'm not sure the names survived the last repainting.
Logged

Now, please!
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1264


View Profile Email
« Reply #28 on: August 01, 2024, 11:57:06 »

Class 175s. Roll Eyes

Did GWR (Great Western Railway) learn nothing from their terrible experience with the Class 180s from the same Alstom Coradia family? They should steer well clear.


I believe there's a significant difference between 175s and 180s. The engine raft design on both is said to be problematic and prone to overheating, but the smaller engine in the 175s means everything is less tightly packed together and ventilation is better.

Certainly ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) seemed to operate 175s without much issue for many years, until TfW transferred the maintenance contract from Alstom at Chester to CAF who had less familiarity with the units... at which point the fires started. (Shades of the 180s which were pretty good under Old Oak Common maintenance and less so when transferred elsewhere.)

But this is definitely not my specialist subject and others will know more.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: August 01, 2024, 12:16:45 »

I would sum them up as:

Reliability:  Better than the 180s, yes, but still not great - and they take a lot of looking after to get decent reliability.

Internal layout:  Excellent.  One of the best.

Capacity:  Poor.  A by-product of the great internal layout.

Suitability for GWR (Great Western Railway):  Not too bad as a stop-gap.  As long as they are mostly kept as 5-car formations and definitely not 2-car ones!  Cardiff<>Portsmouth and Penzance routes would seem to be the best fit.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page