Standardisation of Time and the Railway Clearing House

[whole diary]

[grahame]

From Wikipedia

On 22 September 1847, the RCH recommended that Greenwich Mean Time be adopted as the standard time for all railways in the United Kingdom.

The RCH went on to set technical standards for various items, such as goods wagons, to promote standardisation across the rail network. If a wagon was described as an RCH wagon, this meant it had been built to comply with RCH standards.

The RCH set technical standards for cable connections between coaches for the remote operation of systems; they were initially used only for control of train lighting. These cables were known as RCH jumpers, and in the 1970s a system for push-pull trains was developed which used the RCH cable, eliminating the need for a separate control cable to be fitted to intermediate coaches.

The RCH produced Railway Junction Diagrams (RJDs), which show the junctions where two or more railway companies met, and the distances between these junctions and nearby stations and junctions, in order to aid the calculation of mileage-based rates. Starting in 1859 it also issued what has been described as the "most superb series of railway maps ever produced in the United Kingdom."

Here are some sample maps:







So - what is the modern day equivalent of the Railway Clearing House?

[Electric train]

So - what is the modern day equivalent of the Railway Clearing House?

Some of it is the RSSB^▸ (Rail Safety and Standards Board), things like BS and EN (TSI's etc) there are also Railway Group Standards most of all these can trace most if not all of their roots to RCH, there are also European Railway standards utilised in the UK^▸ (United Kingdom)

[stuving]

So - what is the modern day equivalent of the Railway Clearing House?

Some of it is the RSSB^▸ (Rail Safety and Standards Board), things like BS and EN (TSI's etc) there are also Railway Group Standards most of all these can trace most if not all of their roots to RCH, there are also European Railway standards utilised in the UK^▸ (United Kingdom)

That's on the technical side, but RCH was initially, and mostly, about accounting for fares and goods charges that were shared between companies (hence its name). That is now done by RSP, within RDG^‡(resolve) which does similar things to the wider commercial and representative functions of RCH.

There were also track access charges, between companies, where RCH settled not only bills but disputes (to a limited degree). That function now happens with and within Network rail, with ORR^» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) having powers of enforcement that RCH never had.

I have a feeling that somewhere within NR^» (Network Rail - home page) there must be a place where disagreements between the different bits (geographic, functional, etc.) can be settled. Just being part of one organisation does not stop that being needed.

[Electric train]

I have a feeling that somewhere within NR^» (Network Rail - home page) there must be a place where disagreements between the different bits (geographic, functional, etc.) can be settled. Just being part of one organisation does not stop that being needed.

There is, part of the Andrew Haines "Putting Passengers First" devolution of Network Rail means that each Route or Region has a panel with its TOC^▸ (Train Operating Company)'s n FOCs^▸ (Freight Operating Company) where any delay attribution that has not be accepted goes to the Route Panel.  For inter Route delay attributions can go to the Regional panel or for Route delay attribution that cannot be resolved at Route level.  For inter Regional delay attribution it can go to the National panel or rarely for Region level that cannot be resolved.

The actual Route / Region structure depends on the Region.

Its a micro industry in its own right