Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go

grahame

Administrator
Hero Member

Posts: 43835

Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go

« on: July 06, 2023, 12:01:45 »

Our Heritage railway lines, Railtours, other rail based attractions board is not specific in saying where (in the world)

As I posted up (yet another) Irish thread, I found myself what members think of the geographic range for heritage and attraction posts. As I don't know, I'm asking! Do you want to read about the White Pass and Yukon? The Brokken? Irish pedal rail? Leadhills and Wanlockhead? Mangapps Farm?


	Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member

broadgage

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 5674

Re: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go

« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2023, 16:04:40 »

I voted for "British isles" but would add the caveat that posts about more distant attractions could be included if exceptionally important/interesting.


	Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU^▸ is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.

GBM

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 1756

Re: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go

« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2023, 16:35:20 »

Quote from: broadgage on July 06, 2023, 16:04:40

I voted for "British isles" but would add the caveat that posts about more distant attractions could be included if exceptionally important/interesting.

Lovely to see you posting again broadgage


	Logged

Personal opinion only. Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)

eXPassenger

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 610

Re: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go

« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2023, 21:13:17 »

Quote from: broadgage on July 06, 2023, 16:04:40

I voted for "British isles" but would add the caveat that posts about more distant attractions could be included if exceptionally important/interesting.

I agree


	Logged

grahame

Administrator
Hero Member

Posts: 43835

Re: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go

« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2023, 15:30:53 »

Quote

South West England and South Wales   - 0 (0%)
England and Wales   - 1 (4.3%)
Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales)   - 1 (4.3%)
United Kingdom (Great Britain PLUS Northern Ireland)   - 1 (4.3%)
British Isles (UK^▸ + Ireland, Isle of Man, Channel Islands)   - 11 (47.8%)
Europe   - 0 (0%)
Worldwide   - 9 (39.1%)

No real doubt - anything British Isles is fair game. So if I get to Listowel or Ballybunion I can tell you about it.

Quote from: broadgage on July 06, 2023, 16:04:40

I voted for "British isles" but would add the caveat that posts about more distant attractions could be included if exceptionally important/interesting.

Repeated several times ... so I'm inclined to think that the Cass Scenic Railroad can be included but probably not the Seminole Gulf Railway. Cass, of course, is particularly inclined!


	Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member

Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]

« previous next »