Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:15 03 Apr 2025
 
- Luton airport expansion approved by government
* Ship owner takes legal action over North Sea crash
- Man shot dead by police at railway station named
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 15/04/25 - End, Rail Future consultation
15/04/25 - Everything Electric
16/04/25 - Walk from Chetnole
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury

On this day
3rd Apr (1944)
Wick and Lybster Railway closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
Short Run
22:36 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 03, 2025, 23:27:49 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[130] 185 years of Reading Station
[115] Daily Mile - coming to Melksham for April
[59] [OTD] Senior Railcard launched 1st April 1975
[56] Transport in the West of England - Hustings for the next WECA ...
[46] Government approves Luton Airport expansion
[34] Nottingham to Bristol TM open access service proposed
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Project/Operation Churchward (Replacement Of GWR Regional Rolling Stock)  (Read 753 times)
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 877


View Profile
« on: May 13, 2023, 11:41:55 »

Within the UK (United Kingdom) Rail Forums website I have seen mentions of a 'Project (or Operation) Churchward' - which apparently concerns the wholesale replacement of existing GWR (Great Western Railway) regional rolling stock with a single 'one design fits all' train - but interweb searches produce no other references.



Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43735



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2023, 12:20:05 »

Within the UK (United Kingdom) Rail Forums website I have seen mentions of a 'Project (or Operation) Churchward' - which apparently concerns the wholesale replacement of existing GWR (Great Western Railway) regional rolling stock with a single 'one design fits all' train - but interweb searches produce no other references.

There's a very brief reference to it on page 15 of the GWR Stakeholder briefing of last November on the TWSW» (TravelWatch SouthWest - website) web site:
http://travelwatchsouthwest.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/TWSW-Oct22.pptx


Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19294



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2023, 13:46:41 »

Stadler FLIRTs please.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4530


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2023, 14:15:01 »

Within the UK (United Kingdom) Rail Forums website I have seen mentions of a 'Project (or Operation) Churchward' - which apparently concerns the wholesale replacement of existing GWR (Great Western Railway) regional rolling stock with a single 'one design fits all' train - but interweb searches produce no other references.





Single manufacturer with a 30 years maintain and support contract is the approach DfT» (Department for Transport - about) have been taking
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10439


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2023, 14:43:51 »

Stadler FLIRTs please.

Indeed.  Preferably the tri-mode version.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5663



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2023, 18:49:45 »

Cascade the IETs (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) to regional services, scrapping them is far too expensive.
Build proper inter city trains for the routes presently suffering IETs.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1745


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2023, 08:57:29 »

Cascade the IETs (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) to regional services, scrapping them is far too expensive.
Build proper inter city trains for the routes presently suffering IETs.
Quoting a member - "oooooooooooooooos gonna pay for it"
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5489


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2023, 11:49:57 »

Cascade the IETs (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) to regional services, scrapping them is far too expensive.
Build proper inter city trains for the routes presently suffering IETs.
Quoting a member - "oooooooooooooooos gonna pay for it"

Isn’t the point of an investment that you get more money back than you put in? So the question should, perhaps, be - “ooooooooooooooooos gonna pocket the profit”
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1319


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2024, 22:53:47 »

Latest suggestions is that GWR (Great Western Railway) are to take on the class 175s to allow the final class 255s hsts to be withdrawn as well as to allow and internal cascade of stock such as  the 150s for the Devon and Cornwall metro services, 165s for metrowest around Bristol and 158s to increase capacity on Cardiff to Portsmouth hbr services
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 570



View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2024, 13:34:55 »

175s going to Exeter in place of 158s is doing the rounds on websites.  Problem with them they will not increase capacity at Barnstaple (if a 3 car 175) or Okehampton (if a 2 car 175).  Inevitably some will end up  Paignton-Exmouth as do the 158s. Also they would have to be cleared to Axminster especially if the service is increased.

If a five car (2+3)  is used at Barnstaple to increase capacity, could it still reverse at Exmouth siding.

Two 150 units would be released from Okehampton, but they will probably be needed in Cornwall so Paignton-Exmouth will still need turbos.
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 575


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2024, 15:46:03 »

Bet they'll look lovely in green though :-)
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1319


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2024, 21:04:09 »

175s going to Exeter in place of 158s is doing the rounds on websites.  Problem with them they will not increase capacity at Barnstaple (if a 3 car 175) or Okehampton (if a 2 car 175).  Inevitably some will end up  Paignton-Exmouth as do the 158s. Also they would have to be cleared to Axminster especially if the service is increased.


I've been told this by a few people who are usually pretty spot on.

No doubt dft have realised they can get a good deal abd can reduce costs by replacing castle hsts and dont need to refurbish the 175s as tfw already did it. It also frees up class 150/158/165's to  boost capacity on other routes such as Cardiff to Portsmouth hbr  and metro West services around Bristol. 150/2's can be boost capacity in Cornwall etc.

There was talk of seated Barnstaple services possibly worked by a pair of 2 carriage class 175s

Quote
If a five car (2+3)  is used at Barnstaple to increase capacity, could it still reverse at Exmouth siding.

Two 150 units would be released from Okehampton, but they will probably be needed in Cornwall so Paignton-Exmouth will still need turbos.

Edit to clarify quoting - grahame
« Last Edit: March 06, 2024, 02:25:33 by grahame » Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1024


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2024, 10:03:19 »

Interesting to see the talk about the 175s.  Surely it's more 158s and 150s from Wales that we need?  The 175s would need to be route cleared and then there are the additional complications of managing another quite small fleet of trains.  I'd be surprised to see this happen.
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 570



View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2024, 10:39:22 »

Interesting to see the talk about the 175s.  Surely it's more 158s and 150s from Wales that we need?  The 175s would need to be route cleared and then there are the additional complications of managing another quite small fleet of trains.  I'd be surprised to see this happen.

I think the idea is to replace the 158s at Exeter so they would still only maintain 2 fleets with 165/166s stabling at Exeter as they do now but maintained at Bristol.
Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1024


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2024, 14:39:47 »

Interesting to see the talk about the 175s.  Surely it's more 158s and 150s from Wales that we need?  The 175s would need to be route cleared and then there are the additional complications of managing another quite small fleet of trains.  I'd be surprised to see this happen.

I think the idea is to replace the 158s at Exeter so they would still only maintain 2 fleets with 165/166s stabling at Exeter as they do now but maintained at Bristol.

Of course, we'll see in time.   If the 175s come to Exeter, as well as route clearance, all the crews will need to be trained on them and Exeter Depot staff will need to be trained on how to maintain them, as well as have a stock of spares on hand.   None of it is impossible but it would be a big investment (in time and money) that could be avoided if some of the Welsh 158s and 150s come our way instead.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page