Getting back to the main theme (although I enjoyed the pictures of Mrs Robert's signs and Marlburian's anecdotes - that's one of the joys of this forum!), i though I would assemble an alphabet soup of some of the quotes in this and Chris B's threads that together indicate why I think something more radical is required than "abolishing" return tickets (or is this return fares?).
Return tickets are set to be scrapped as Rishi Sunak gives the green light to long-awaited sweeping reforms of Britain’s railways.
The rollout of "single-leg pricing" will be unveiled
At the time, LNER» said: “Rail tickets can be confusing. We want to make choosing and buying rail tickets simpler and more transparent. We hope this new structure is more straightforward: there are no more return tickets – one journey requires just one ticket.”
Return train tickets: What scrapping fares will mean for prices and how the UK▸ compares to other countries
Return train tickets will be scrapped in a Government shakeup to the UK’s rail system expected to be announced by Transport Secretary Mark Harper on Tuesday.
Under the reforms likely to be unveiled, the price of two singles will be adjusted to come to the same as the current return fare.
LNER said the change also benefits passengers who wish to make a round-trip as these customers do not need to decide in advance the precise date and time that they wish to travel, which allows for changes to their plans.
What kind of ticket will I have to buy?
There are currently a host of options for rail passengers – a source of confusion and frustration to many travellers. Under the new system it is expected there will be three types of tickets to choose from:
– Anytime singles, which can be used on any route and are typically the most expensive option as a result
– Off-peak singles, whereby customers pay cheaper prices for travelling on trains that are less busy than the most popular services. Passengers usually have to travel during specific times and on certain days of the week on these tickets.
– Advance singles, which are for specific trains, and are cheaper than off-peak tickets and anytime singles as travellers have no flexibility to change their plans.
The practice, known as dynamic pricing, is widely used in the airline industry, with fares progressively increasing as more seats sell. Airlines have come under fire for massively inflating prices on school holiday dates and for major events, particularly overseas sporting finals.
He will also announce plans to roll out pay-as-you-go ticketing across the South East, which will enable travellers to pay for journeys by tapping in and out with contactless cards or phones - similar to London's Oyster▸ system.
It’s wonderful that they want to scrap returns and offer only singles instead. However will I still be able to buy two singles at the start of my journey to make up the return I would have otherwise bought? Will there be an option to buy two singles to make up a return as easily and quickly as buying a return now? The last thing we need is to have everyone have to go through buying two individual singles because that will clog up the ticket machines at Paddington and elsewhere.
I very often arrive at the station to start my return journey with very little time to spare. I do not want to have to buy a ticket for the return journey after the outward one. I certainly don’t want to have it on a device or pick it up from a machine at the station.
Quote from: Bmblbzzz on Today at 12:32:43 am
It doesn't actually make sense. How can a single be half the price of a return, as opposed to just a pound or ten pence less, if "operators are unable to significantly reduce prices"? How can a single be half the price of a return, if a return has no fixed price, as is consequent on demand-based pricing? And how can "anyone feel confident they're getting the best value for money" when they're unable to know the price in advance?
Operators *currently* are unable to reduce prices; once these reforms are in, the single in a lot of cases will be reduced in price.
Returns will be no more, so it would be (one of?) the three types of single - likely the Advance, I'd say - that will fluctaute (as it does now, so no real change actually)
I suspect & hope that the other two types of singles (off-peak & Anytime) won't be demand-based priced, but fixed.
No mention of fixing the peak times across the country to be the same everywhere (or no peak at certain stations where flows permit), which I feel was a missed opportunity.
So - confusion reigns!
We have only three types of tickets to make it simpler, but then "dynamic pricing" will be tried as will "pay as you go", so you will not know what a journey costs if you want to plan in advance and budget for your journey before buying your ticket and buy on the day of travel.
It is unclear, even to members of this forum which largely consists of experienced rail passengers whether the ticket/all the tickets for both legs of your journey will be available to be bought at the same time.
We will be left with parts of the country where you tap in and tap out, and only find out (presumably) later what it has actually costed you, and others where you do not, and therefore potential confusion if you travel across the boundary between the two (as I imagine that most travelling into London from outside Greater London will).
In the meantime, many casual travellers will have a take home message from the click-bait headlines and press releases that they can't buy a ticket or tickets for both outward and return legs of their journeys, and that the cheap day return (which I think is now culturally embedded in our national pysche as what you get if you travel out of peak times, even if it is in rail-speak "two advance singles") will be abolished, so they will think that the days of cheap days out by train avoiding rush hour are over.
Don't they understand that for most people "a return ticket" can mean either a single one that covers both journeys, the outward and return portion of a ticket or the outward and return advance singles?
Well done everyone - departmental issuers of press releases, newspaper journalists, editors and headline writers - you have just done more to discourage rail travel than anyone (apart possibly certain union leaders?). Is this a cunning plan to reduce overcrowding?
And as to the suggestion that as a person still possessing two legs I will have to pay double rail fares....
This is what prompted my wider ranging suggestions at the beginning of this thread.