Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 10 Jan 2025
 
* Three teens arrested over boy's bus station death
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:36 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:52 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:38 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:33 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 18:46:39 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[97] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[91] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[81] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[38] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[20] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Full and standing..  (Read 5302 times)
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« on: April 30, 2008, 10:44:28 »

..on the 4 car 158 07.58 Trowbridge to Cardiff.

I'm not sure what happended to the 07.23 Warminster - Great Malvern but thankfully the 07.58 was 4 car and was literally packed all the way to Bristol.

Journey was lightened a little as I bumped into an old acquaintance who was on his way to Swindon for Guard training who thought he might miss his conection at Bath. He had already noted the crap direct service so I suggested he should mention it when he got there.  Grin
Logged
Graz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2008, 13:10:31 »

I know exactly what the problem was Wink

What should happen is the early morning train from Bristol Temple M to Westbury which I get at Oldfield Park (leaves Bath Spa 07:00 ) arrives at Westbury at 07:25, and couples with the train arriving from Warminster to form a 4 car service to Great Malvern departing Westbury 07:38. Usually this runs like clockwork.

Today the one down from Bristol was a class 143 pacer. (Varies- often a 150, but sometimes a 158, 143 or 150/1). Lovely journey down and arrived Westbury early, but there was a problem coupling it with the 150 up from Warminster. The door unlocking system wasn't working properly despite repeated re-coupling attempts (the problem was with the 143 apparently) and after the 07:52 left, the 143+150 left Westbury empty, not sure where it went after that. I have seen 143s couple properly before, so I'm not sure what happened today.

Lots of platform alterations at Westbury because of this!
Logged
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2008, 14:45:11 »

I know exactly what the problem was Wink

The door unlocking system wasn't working properly despite repeated re-coupling attempts (the problem was with the 143 apparently) and after the 07:52 left, the 143+150 left Westbury empty, not sure where it went after that. I have seen 143s couple properly before, so I'm not sure what happened today.

Someone obviously didn't know the kicking the door trick,  Wink which usually sorts out any problems with brakes being applied inadvertantly on 143's.

As I didn't have time this morning to look at the departure board at Trowbridge it wasn't clear whether the 07.44 had been cancelled or not, it's usually a neat idea if it shows 'delayed' and the first arrival then gets jammed, to wait for the following which is then empty, just a few mins late that's all. There were plenty at Bradford who chose not to board knowing that they would get a nice journey to work. (Ok if you are flexible)

Would hate to think what would have happened if there had been a problem in Fratton and it had turned up as a 2 car.  Shocked Shocked, 18 months ago this scenario was a regular occurence leading to zero space after Bradford, so I have every sympathy with passengers at Bath/Oldfield/Keynsham who at the time were regularly watching 2 car trains passing them already full from Trowbridge, if TonyA hadn't done something then someone else would have.

Logged
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2008, 15:08:20 »


Would hate to think what would have happened if there had been a problem in Fratton and it had turned up as a 2 car.  Shocked Shocked, 18 months ago this scenario was a regular occurence leading to zero space after Bradford, so I have every sympathy with passengers at Bath/Oldfield/Keynsham who at the time were regularly watching 2 car trains passing them already full from Trowbridge, if TonyA hadn't done something then someone else would have.



Well, his "Pretend not to pay tactics" certainally do the trick it would seem!
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
Graz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2008, 15:43:51 »

I know exactly what the problem was Wink

The door unlocking system wasn't working properly despite repeated re-coupling attempts (the problem was with the 143 apparently) and after the 07:52 left, the 143+150 left Westbury empty, not sure where it went after that. I have seen 143s couple properly before, so I'm not sure what happened today.

Someone obviously didn't know the kicking the door trick,  Wink which usually sorts out any problems with brakes being applied inadvertantly on 143's.

Actually, the conductor did try that on the 143 on every door -- but no luck!!  Grin  Wink
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2008, 18:29:17 »

Pacers are known for this problem, i know ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) keep some coupled permanently because of this, think Exeter keep some 142s like this as well
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2008, 23:01:52 »

Pacers are known for this problem, i know ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) keep some coupled permanently because of this, think Exeter keep some 142s like this as well


it is because the couplers are old and worn,plus pacers should only couple to pacers they do not like being attached to sprinters due to one being axle vehicle with coil spring suspension the other being bogie vehicle with air bag suspension.
Logged
tramway
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 617



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2008, 23:15:39 »

158 + 143 not uncommon between Trowbridge and Bristol.
Logged
BPWuser
Full Member
***
Posts: 38


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2008, 23:20:38 »

The 17.47 from BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains) to Westbury was a 143+150 today. They looked like they were attached to each other! Although unusual to see a 143 on this service.
Logged
Jim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1186


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2008, 06:45:34 »

The 17.47 from BPW» (Bristol Parkway - next trains) to Westbury was a 143+150 today. They looked like they were attached to each other! Although unusual to see a 143 on this service.

Booked for 3 car isn't it?
Logged

Cheers
Jim Smiley
AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page