Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 09 Jan 2025
 
* Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 22:12:20 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[140] Railcard Prices going up
[98] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[88] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[75] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[28] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW have priority between Reading and Didcot?  (Read 4319 times)
Boppy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 182


View Profile
« on: April 28, 2008, 17:47:25 »

Hi,

I've just got back from a trip up to Penrith from Reading (XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) Voyager Reading to Man Picc and then TransPenn Man Picc to Penrith).

I was delighted that my journeys there and back went smoothly with one exception on each journey on the same piece of track.

I noticed on our outward journey from Reading that we were on the relief line up to Didcot seemingly stuck behind a local service whilst FGW (First Great Western) HST (High Speed Train) one after another passed us on the main line.  We arrived about 10minutes late at our first stop at Oxford.

Then on the way back with no hold ups anywhere after passing Didcot we were again put on the relief line and had a halting journey all the way to Reading whilst several FGW HSTs passed us by with us arriving late at Reading.

The thing is is that it wasn't for about 10minutes that any train passed us on the way back which makes me wonder why the XC Voyager couldn't have been put on the main line instead.

Does anyone know if there is a policy to keep the XC trains off the main line in that area so that the FGW HSTs aren't held up?

Thanks,

Boppy.

P.S.  I did have a look at the other forums and wasn't sure where to post this.  Also apologies if this is a known/already debated subject!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2008, 17:50:49 »

Most Voyagers are booked to use the relief lines, I presume there are clashes at Reading which mean the Reliefs are easier to use. Besides; Swindon B (The Panel that controls Didcot) uses ARS (Automatic Route Setting) which sets routes as per the timetable automatically.
Logged
Boppy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 182


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2008, 18:05:33 »

Hi,

Thanks for the prompt reply!

Boppy.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2008, 20:43:51 »

Yes, thanks, d_m!  Wink

Something occurs to me, in light of your post.

I was on the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) Voyager 0846 from Nailsea & Backwell to Durham (well, it goes there eventually!) this morning, and I noticed that, yet again, we went up the relief past Bedminster.  There was no apparent reason for this - we were on time, there was no goods train in evidence and FGW (First Great Western) services were either a quarter of an hour ahead or a quarter of an hour behind us.

Is it policy to just put any XC trains off the main line whenever possible??

 Huh

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2008, 20:47:05 »


Is it policy to just put any XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) trains off the main line whenever possible??

 Huh


Completly the oposite for Plymouth-Edigburgh services they are headcode 9 giving them special priority.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2008, 21:28:47 »

Yes, thanks, d_m!  Wink

Something occurs to me, in light of your post.

I was on the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) Voyager 0846 from Nailsea & Backwell to Durham (well, it goes there eventually!) this morning, and I noticed that, yet again, we went up the relief past Bedminster.  There was no apparent reason for this - we were on time, there was no goods train in evidence and FGW (First Great Western) services were either a quarter of an hour ahead or a quarter of an hour behind us.

Is it policy to just put any XC trains off the main line whenever possible??

 Huh



Yes I noticed that this morning. I suppose we can't be sure that the preceding train wasn't held for some reason at Bedminster, but I sometimes get the feeling they do it for the variety. I estimate it loses about a minute because of the approach controlling at Long Ashton, and of the braking down to around 20mph and need to accelerate wastes energy as well.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2008, 21:56:09 »

Thanks, John!

That's my theory too, actually - see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2050.msg15798#msg15798  Roll Eyes Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2008, 09:57:57 »


Is it policy to just put any XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) trains off the main line whenever possible??

 Huh


Completly the oposite for Plymouth-Edigburgh services they are headcode 9 giving them special priority.

To most siggies class 9 means "ok, it's a CrossCountry, if they've lost their path, let's put them behind stoppers to wind Beardy!"
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2008, 15:36:42 »

Yes, thanks, d_m!  Wink

Something occurs to me, in light of your post.

I was on the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) Voyager 0846 from Nailsea & Backwell to Durham (well, it goes there eventually!) this morning, and I noticed that, yet again, we went up the relief past Bedminster.  There was no apparent reason for this - we were on time, there was no goods train in evidence and FGW (First Great Western) services were either a quarter of an hour ahead or a quarter of an hour behind us.

Is it policy to just put any XC trains off the main line whenever possible??

 Huh

Nailsea to Durham on a Vomit comet........you poor soul Chris
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2008, 20:05:26 »

If the Voyagers are booked to go on the relief lines, how come Boppy's trains became late - surely XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) would have enough slack? Huh
Logged
Boppy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 182


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2008, 15:57:07 »

That's what I was wondering .. but I am thinking that as we did arrive at the final destintaion Man Picc on the way out on time then this kind of delay is just catered for in the slack.  I am guessing that maybe on the way back the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) also maybe caught up it's 10minutes on the way to Guildford which was it's final destination.

If the delay though is caused by a late running preceding train on the relief is there the option for the XC to be switched to the main?  Or is it designed so that the XC is expected to catch up on time elsewhere so just always stays on the relief.

Thanks,

Boppy.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2008, 16:12:42 »

If the Voyagers are booked to go on the relief lines, how come Boppy's trains became late - surely XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) would have enough slack? Huh

Late turbo no doubt
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #12 on: May 01, 2008, 06:46:18 »

From my mailbox ...

Quote
"Boppy FGW (First Great Western) trains run at 125 on the main line between Didcot and Reading. the max speed for a Vogager on this stretch is 110. The reason for this is the line is fitted with Automatic Train Protection whilst the Arriva rolling isn't If the rolling stock is missing the equipment then thats the rules I'm afraid. If the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) service has a clear path to Reading it makes sense to use the relief save holding up any faster trains. However on saying that FGW services are constantly made to wait for Cross Country trains to pass. When stood on Platform 4 with my train recently a XC arrived into Platform 3 from Basinstoke, the driver was allowed to change ends and the train then allowed ahead of the GW (Great Western) HST (High Speed Train) along the down main towards Didcot. My train left about 4 late and was held up again due to fact that the XC service had to pass from the Main line to the Relief at Morton Cutting!"
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: May 01, 2008, 09:59:33 »

Grahame

The experience related is not unusual. Snooker Junction (colour after red) didn't get it's name for nothing.

Reading panel was always a law unto itself even in the 80s when I travelled from Taplow to Reading. One of the problems being that the layout has too many conflicting moves so in a real time situation the signalman has to make a decison as to which trains  to let into/out of the station and which to hold outside. As the running of trains is never consistent to the split second they sometimes make what seem bizarre decisons. However, without knowing the position and running of every train at the precise time the decision is made it is difficult to know whether it was the right one.

Coming the  other way Swindon B has control with ARS (Automatic Route Setting). As far as I know ARS doesn't have hindsight. Therefore, if a late running stopper is  on the Up Relief ARS will route the following XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) onto the Up Relief as well as booked. The signalman would, therefore, have to switch off ARS for the Up Oxford and route the XC over to the mainline. Looking at the timetable this sceanario is more likely to be a late running XC 15/43 that has followed the ontime stopper 21/55  from Oxford. However, the signalman would still have to intervene. Hopefully I can check this on Friday.

The question of ATP (Automatic Train Protection) is not relevant Vomiters can run Main or Relief as can Turbos also not ATP fitted. The Brightons were on the main at Taplow this am.

« Last Edit: May 01, 2008, 14:43:04 by eightf48544 » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page