6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
|
|
« Reply #60 on: August 04, 2008, 12:22:31 » |
|
if only they had more carrages... no need to run 2 sets together no need to rip units apart and get rid of the shop... there is something to be said for locos
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ollie
|
|
« Reply #61 on: August 04, 2008, 15:22:29 » |
|
I've heard of plans to do a smaller buffet, swap it round, and do the seating as standard, which would be the best option really, so hope what I heard is correct. * FGW▸ btw
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #62 on: August 04, 2008, 17:55:04 » |
|
Ollie, that rumour has also made its way down to the South West too
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #63 on: August 04, 2008, 18:00:30 » |
|
I've heard of plans to do a smaller buffet, swap it round, and do the seating as standard, which would be the best option really, so hope what I heard is correct. * FGW▸ btw I'm sure that was suggested on the Coffee Shop sometime ago (maybe not the smaller buffet, but flipping the buffet around and installing standard class seats. Maybe have half a coach fully tabled as well, leave unreserved (or restrict reservations to groups of 3 or more in that coach if feasible) and have signs saying "these seats are served for groups of 3 or more"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #64 on: August 04, 2008, 18:58:59 » |
|
Actually, having thought about it again, I thought it was XC▸ that was going to do a mini-buffet/standard class seating, and FGW▸ were just leaving as was.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
Ollie
|
|
« Reply #65 on: August 04, 2008, 21:43:12 » |
|
I think I might have it all written down somewhere, will have to see if I can find it =]
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
r james
|
|
« Reply #66 on: August 04, 2008, 23:32:11 » |
|
Are there enough bufet cars around to do this though? I thought all of the MK3 HST▸ Buffets were going to FGW▸ , even even then there wasn't enough for them?
Or can they make absorb the cost of converting a MK3 Coaching stock buffet?
WOuld definitely be a way of adding even more seats to those sets!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #67 on: August 17, 2008, 20:21:14 » |
|
Over the weekend one of the refurbed National Express HSTs▸ on loan to XC▸ was in operation. It looked quite smart, although rather white/grey/boring colours, seats looked the same style as Voyagers - although no idea how they actually felt in comparison. I liked the extra touches on the door window that said. "Welcome to NEx. Please wait for the yellow light before attempting to open the door/yank the handle off" (or something like that )
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #68 on: September 14, 2009, 21:28:01 » |
|
Sorry to drag this thread up again. Does anyone know which trains from Birmingham - Durham and Durham - Birmingham are run by XC▸ HSTs▸ on weekdays? Thanks in advance, Btline
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #70 on: September 14, 2009, 22:18:30 » |
|
Thanks!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #71 on: September 14, 2009, 22:50:49 » |
|
For diagrams for all sorts of workings, written in plainer English than that other suggestion, see this site http://www.thejunction.org.uk/ and click on the Diagrams link at the top of the page. The XC▸ HSTs▸ ones are pretty near the top of the list and were up-to-date in May, so can't imagine they will have altered since.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #72 on: September 14, 2009, 22:58:21 » |
|
All the XC▸ HST▸ services run through FGW▸ territory, and the appropriate FGW timetable tells you which ones are HSTs, so if you compare the FGW and XC timetables you can work it out...
But if you want to go Birmingham > Durham > Birmingham as posted, you can't do it in one day, because the HSTs all go from various points North to Plymouth then return North in the afternoon...
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #73 on: September 14, 2009, 23:45:42 » |
|
Someone had better tell the folks at the ICRS site that the CRS code for Plymouth is PLY» and not PMH, unless there's been a dramatic change if plan I'm not aware of and Portsmouth Harbour is now served by XC▸ HSTs▸ (which if I recall correctly from an earlier thread, don't all have the requisite bogie types to run over the 3rd rail).
I'll put my anorak away at this point.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #74 on: September 15, 2009, 00:22:20 » |
|
Well, as I was tripped up on my spelling, and blatant misuse of an apostrophe, recently, I'll just shrug myself into that anorak, and also point out the following: DUN is Dunbar, not Dundee - that's DEE; MAP doesn't exist - Manchester Piccadilly is MAN; PTN is Portadown, not Paignton - that's PGN. C.
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
|