grahame
« on: November 19, 2021, 18:25:51 »
From
the BBC» Bradford has the worst rail connections of any major British city, a report has found. Despite being the UK▸ 's seventh largest city and being centrally located, it came bottom of the list due to a lack of direct rail routes and slow connections.There are four trains to London - the best connected city - each day. Local politicians said the findings proved Bradford needs a stop on the Northern Powerhouse Rail line.
And they are withdrawing those next month.
Oh - wait - wrong Bradford. But a striking similarity.
The article goes on to say how important good rail links are. That's the same too.
Logged
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Mark A
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2021, 10:09:24 »
Petition to rename the 05:35 departure the 'Bradford Executive', yes?
Logged
grahame
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2021, 11:38:22 »
Petition to rename the 05:35 departure the 'Bradford Executive', yes?
Ah - along the same lines that the Flying Scotsman [train] is now the silly O'clock from Edinburgh and there is no return working?
I have only, ever, started two petitions. Both have helped raise the profile of cases with
MPs▸ and politicians to the extent that questions have been raised in parliament once an unanticipated (by "Whitehall") concern has come to light.
I'm not planning to start another one any time soon - there's a huge risk in doing so that the petitioner proves that they've not really got much support. The only topic that meets my very narrow criteria at present is ... already running, and I would encourage anyone who not yet done so to take a look and sign at
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/598397 If a petition reaches an average of 15 signatures across
UK▸ constituencies (10,000 in total), it gets a written response. If it gets an average of 154 (100,000 in total), it is "considered" for a debate in Parliament. Mine has 1,482 in the Chippenham Constituency and 1,351 in South West Wilts, , 428 in Bath and 316 in North East Somerset.
It
has been notice by our MPs - with just 54.3% of votes cast for her in 2019, Michelle Donelan needs to work hard and indeed has been doing so. Providing a win on this one would do her, and Andrew Murrison (safer at 60.2%), the world of good.
A week is a long time in politics, and we still have three
Logged
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Mark A
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2021, 22:04:57 »
(Petition suggestion was a joke. The suggestion that that becomes the coffee shop's nickname for that train is sincere though.) Full disclosure. I stood on Bridge Street bridge, Bradford, on the day that the second rail fare rise of the year was announced, bringing that year's fare rises to... was it 94%? To my right, the underwhelming new Bradford Interchange station. To my left, the surviving few sections of Bradford Exchange Station's roof above the former concourse, the paired fan lights that closed the train shed end in plain view from onlookers on the bridge, but not for a good reason. A chapter in the strange life and times of the city's railways had closed.
Logged
grahame
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2021, 06:47:23 »
(Petition suggestion was a joke. The suggestion that that becomes the coffee shop's nickname for that train is sincere though.)
I took it as such - however, I should have added a smiley face or summat. It was a wonderful hook onto which to hang serious comment.
A nickname for the service is an excellent idea - probably for the service rather than individual trains - as the start of a marketing strategy. As I recall
it was my shorthand that first used the name "TransWilts" for Swindon to Salisbury services ... but nothing has stuck that shorthand chord yet on these. I refer to them sometimes as "The Waterloos" but whilst that's understood in West Wiltshire and
WECA» , it feels almost designed to be a headscratcher in Mandrin (Horseferry Road dialect) which is the big place across the way they catch their half-hourly train home to Chessington, Haslemere or Virginia Water.
Not keen on "Bradford Executive" - ties it to one place (or two!), and "executive" points to the crumbled business traveller market. Noting the "Great West Way" marketing campaign of Visit Wiltshire, these trains could be the "Great Way West" - but that strikes me better as a limited marketing name to attract the tourism market.
Full disclosure. I stood on Bridge Street bridge, Bradford, on the day that the second rail fare rise of the year was announced, bringing that year's fare rises to... was it 94%? To my right, the underwhelming new Bradford Interchange station. To my left, the surviving few sections of Bradford Exchange Station's roof above the former concourse, the paired fan lights that closed the train shed end in plain view from onlookers on the bridge, but not for a good reason. A chapter in the strange life and times of the city's railways had closed.
I recall, very vaguely, passing through the old Exchange station it must have been around 50 years ago, towards the end. But not familiar with the why's and wherefores of the history. Struck me as unfortunate that the line didn't go through connecting to Forster Square, who's survival was, I think, in question at one point?
Logged
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
PrestburyRoad
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2021, 09:23:05 »
I recall, very vaguely, passing through the old Exchange station it must have been around 50 years ago, towards the end. But not familiar with the why's and wherefores of the history. Struck me as unfortunate that the line didn't go through connecting to Forster Square, who's survival was, I think, in question at one point?
I too remember the old Exchange station, and I remember seeing a Deltic at the head of a London-bound train.
Bradford (Yorkshire) has long bemoaned the lack of a through station. An underlying cause is geography: the line from the hills to the south comes in at a much higher level than the line from valley in the north, and consequently the two stations - Exchange and Forster Square - are at different levels. Another factor is that the lines and stations were built by competing companies.
Logged
Mark A
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2021, 12:19:18 »
[Struck me as unfortunate that the line didn't go through connecting to Forster Square, who's survival was, I think, in question at one point?
Can't recall when it was - early on a winter evening, Forster Square had just been electrified and the new service to London introduced, but the station approach not remodelled, so passengers basically made their way through various ruins of the old station to the new platforms.
Heading for the train myself, and on the pavement outside, I met a couple who had been walking round for some time looking for the station, were now standing at its entrance, with a lot of dereliction to hand, and despite being in front of it, in the gloom still didn't recognise the station for what it was.
Together, we set out for the platforms, and the next couple of minutes were like some kind of Urbex excursion before lights appeared and the sight of OHLE, nine or so well-lit carriages, looking like something that had been dropped in from another world. As, in a way, they had.
Several years later, staying in Bradford for a conference in Leeds, I was able to enjoy a couple of trips at commuter time from Forster Square to Leeds, particularly memorable for the way the train passed several stupendous clusters of stationary vehicles stuck in congestion fed in from the A650 and the newly opened Bingley bypass and now stuck solid on the roads of... anywhere east of Shipley.
Bradford planners themselves seem to have overseen a *lot* of road building - while avoiding the opportunity for even passive provision to enable, in due course, the two stations to be joined - around 2011 with land between the two largely cleared for redevelopment, that would have been a good time for a link, but it's certainly the road *not* taken and almost actively avoided.
The latest (very recently deceased) proposal has the local authority positing the site that previously hosted the approaches to what was an early terminus for Bradford, Adolphus Street Station, for the through station on the Manchester Leeds line - desperately remote from the city centre. But to bring the line beneath the city centre is hardly realistic either, or not without some very deep-level tunnelling to bring the lines through.
Logged
stuving
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2021, 13:57:01 »
Bradford planners themselves seem to have overseen a *lot* of road building - while avoiding the opportunity for even passive provision to enable, in due course, the two stations to be joined - around 2011 with land between the two largely cleared for redevelopment, that would have been a good time for a link, but it's certainly the road *not* taken and almost actively avoided. The latest (very recently deceased) proposal has the local authority positing the site that previously hosted the approaches to what was an early terminus for Bradford, Adolphus Street Station, for the through station on the Manchester Leeds line - desperately remote from the city centre. But to bring the line beneath the city centre is hardly realistic either, or not without some very deep-level tunnelling to bring the lines through.
I think the gradient of the line from the south is the biggest problem. The vertical offset actually helps - you could drop down a little at Forster Square and then start tunnelling, and once under the Midland Hotel, set off upwards. If the southern line was moderately level, you could pop up and intercept it with 1-2 km of tunnel length, which might be affordable. But the steep gradient means you wouldn't emerge until several miles further south. So the only practical link tunnel is one just below the surface, which would have to be part of a comprehensive redevelopment (pick your own tense).
Logged
Lee
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2021, 14:43:39 »
If you want to see through your own eyes what has been described in the previous posts, then the following video is an excellent way of doing so:VIDEO I can't do you a Deltic at the head of a London-bound train out of Bradford Exchange, but I can do you a Class 47 hauling a Class 91 set out of the old Bradford Forster Square platforms:VIDEO
Logged
Mark A
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2021, 16:02:56 »
Most of an HST▸ but missing a power car and with a Class 91 in its place for good measure?
Logged
onthecushions
« Reply #10 on: November 21, 2021, 16:55:55 »
Good example of stock compatibility. Couplings, brakes, ETS▸ , control all working together (was the power car just providing ETS or was it providing traction as well?) OTC
Logged
stuving
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2021, 17:45:28 »
Good example of stock compatibility. Couplings, brakes, ETS▸ , control all working together (was the power car just providing ETS or was it providing traction as well?) OTC
Well, you can see that the class 43 hauled the train in, but also that is had buffers - so it was one of those stand-in
DVTs‡ . Obviously they had controls for the class 91, and did they also provide hotel power to the Mk 3s? You would hardly expect controls to be fitted in the class 91 for the class 43, hence the need to drag it out again.
But was that routine, for the five years or so before electrification into Forster Square? Or was this a one-off, or cover for some other line closure?
Logged
onthecushions
« Reply #12 on: November 21, 2021, 18:44:41 »
I think that RSSB▸ SD001 refers. All three power units were TDM/RCH fitted although the 125 originally had a 36 way jumper. The ETS▸ had to come from the 125 as it was 415/3/50, not 1000V/600A. The Southern was the master of this sort of thing, with weird consists all plugged together with 27 way jumpers, all motored! Apologies for abbreviations. OTC
Logged
TonyN
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2021, 20:24:47 »
If you want to see through your own eyes what has been described in the previous posts, then the following video is an excellent way of doing so:
Thanks for that I was lucky enough to arrive at the old Bradford Exchange steam hauled in the 1960s but did not go to Foster square until after the first electric services where introduced using ex LT&S class 308 units.
Logged
stuving
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2021, 23:23:33 »
You would hardly expect controls to be fitted in the class 91 for the class 43, hence the need to drag it out again.
And to start with there wasn't any way to apply traction power in a trailing pseudo-
DVT‡ . But later (than exactly when, I don't know) this was made possible, and for a somewhat bizarre reason. This is from
http://www.traintesting.com/ic225_2.htm :
Initially the DVT's power unit was only used to supply ETS▸ for the Mk3 coaches, as they differed from the Mk4's, and hence the engines were only running at approx 1000 rpm, just above idling. However, prolonged use of the power cars in this way lead to an excessive build up of un-burnt fuel in the silencers and this eventually lead to fires. One occurred at Hornsey, just outside Ferme Park and this brought the OHLE down too. After a repeat performance it was decided that the engines should be powered up as normal and this then meant that the test trains had a combined available power of over 7000 HP. A modification to the TDM control s allowed the engine to be controlled from the class 91 and an increase in speed up to the maximum of 125 mile/h was accomplished with ease!,
Whether that made it practical to operate a train with no motive power but a trailing class 43 DVT is another question.
Logged