Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 22 Apr 2025
 
- Royal Navy's flagship HMS Prince of Wales departs on major deployment
- Survivors of Cumbria shooting spree recall terror 15 years on
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
22nd Apr (1833)
Death of Richard Trevithick (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:49 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:10 Slough to Windsor & Eton Central
17:20 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
16:10 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
16:34 Newbury to London Paddington
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
16:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:52 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
Delayed
16:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
16:18 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:23 London Paddington to Oxford
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Evesham
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 22, 2025, 17:24:33 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[89] Heritage v national network - some personal thoughts
[56] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[46] Across the South West over Easter - trains in pictures
[33] Fortuitous connections ... and an App which fails to offer the...
[32] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[30] Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and even...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Did I dream it????  (Read 26143 times)
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: May 13, 2008, 18:18:33 »

To prevent repeated usage of such tickets where it is unlikely you will get a ticket check.

So just in case a few people might cheat, everybody has to pay more

Another case of guilty until proven innocent

I cant think of another area where people ASSUME you will cheat

So Mookie, do you suggest we put barriers everywhere and hence (according to your theory) victimise and massivly inconvenience everyone?

Can't win Wink

I don't feel particularly victimised or inconvenienced when I go through the barrier at Temple Meads in the morning. Even if I have to wait 30 seconds because 2 train loads have passengers have arrived at once. Barriers are a highly effective revenue protection tool, and if someone buys a ticket from Reading to Reading West and are then challenged then they are clearly fare-dodging, and deserve what they get.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: May 13, 2008, 18:24:03 »

To prevent repeated usage of such tickets where it is unlikely you will get a ticket check.

So just in case a few people might cheat, everybody has to pay more

Another case of guilty until proven innocent

I cant think of another area where people ASSUME you will cheat

So Mookie, do you suggest we put barriers everywhere and hence (according to your theory) victimise and massivly inconvenience everyone?

Can't win Wink

I don't feel particularly victimised or inconvenienced when I go through the barrier at Temple Meads in the morning. Even if I have to wait 30 seconds because 2 train loads have passengers have arrived at once. Barriers are a highly effective revenue protection tool, and if someone buys a ticket from Reading to Reading West and are then challenged then they are clearly fare-dodging, and deserve what they get.

Yes, but with HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) and SDO (Selective Door Opening), they are unlikely to be caught!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: May 13, 2008, 18:27:25 »

Mookiemoo, can I suggest a career change to head of revenue protection, i'm sure the industry experts would love to hear your radical plan to change things  Cheesy
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: May 13, 2008, 18:29:22 »

Nor DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit). Family went from Nailsea to Weston on Sunday. Outward journey was very lightly loaded service. No attempt on either journey to check our tickets. Wasn't sure whether Groupsave was cheapest ticket so didn't buy at ticket machine. So if I hadn't gone to ticket office on arrival at Weston would have travelled for free. (Ticket office was closed by the time we returned.)

    
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #34 on: May 13, 2008, 18:45:12 »

Mookiemoo, can I suggest a career change to head of revenue protection, i'm sure the industry experts would love to hear your radical plan to change things  Cheesy

It is not a plan to change things as you well know - I'm merely pointing out that barriers, if one applies logic and forethought, do not actually solve the problem.
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: May 13, 2008, 19:14:15 »

Mookiemoo, can I suggest a career change to head of revenue protection, i'm sure the industry experts would love to hear your radical plan to change things  Cheesy

It is not a plan to change things as you well know - I'm merely pointing out that barriers, if one applies logic and forethought, do not actually solve the problem.

I think the evidence is that they increase revenue significantly. So they minimise (not eliminate) a) faredodgers, b) passengers expecting and willing to pay who when faced with no barrier walk straight through.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: May 13, 2008, 21:20:58 »

Mookiemoo, can I suggest a career change to head of revenue protection, i'm sure the industry experts would love to hear your radical plan to change things  Cheesy

It is not a plan to change things as you well know - I'm merely pointing out that barriers, if one applies logic and forethought, do not actually solve the problem.
Nothing could ever SOLVE the problem because society has changed, but barriers are VERY effective as the average faredodger is far to fu**ing thick to buy a ticket to the next station etc etc, barriers have PROVED to be the most effective form of revenue protection, if they weren't then TOC (Train Operating Company)'s wouldn't be justified in spending hundreds of millions installing them!
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #37 on: May 13, 2008, 22:24:30 »

Mookiemoo, can I suggest a career change to head of revenue protection, i'm sure the industry experts would love to hear your radical plan to change things  Cheesy

It is not a plan to change things as you well know - I'm merely pointing out that barriers, if one applies logic and forethought, do not actually solve the problem.
Nothing could ever SOLVE the problem because society has changed, but barriers are VERY effective as the average faredodger is far to fu**ing thick to buy a ticket to the next station etc etc, barriers have PROVED to be the most effective form of revenue protection, if they weren't then TOC (Train Operating Company)'s wouldn't be justified in spending hundreds of millions installing them!

And whilst I personally do not like barriers for genuine reasons - the times my train has been sitting on the platform about to leave but for reasons beyond my control I have not got a ticket yet OR my ticket is SOMEWHERE in my bag but I cant find it in time etc etc etc and when your next train could be two hours away it is not good to have the sphincter police saying no go

However ...... I can vaguely accept this whilst suggesting that if they employ native speakers who have the innate ability to apply common sense and the intelligence to note if they see someone every day and just once they dont have their ticket in hand its probably ok (this actually happened at slough where they ended up recognising me and actually happens at REading because I take time to acknowledge their presence and say thank you and please)

Charging me more to come back tomorrow on the same train as I would today just because someone would use their return tice - sorry, if they have intelligence to work that out, they have the intelligence to buy a ticket to the next station
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #38 on: May 13, 2008, 22:32:17 »

Actually what I think should happen is this - they treat everyone as if honest

BUT do random (but not rare) checks

If you are caught dodging then you are either (a) given a custodial sentence (b) have all your benefits stopped (c) at a minimum have a criminal record (d) thrown into the equivalent of the work house

Of course it is not going to happen but it doesnt mean to say it should not.

The problem is, if the fine is what it is, its worth chancing it

Make it so reprehensible the honest wont do it - and those that do are scum


Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: May 13, 2008, 23:14:25 »

You forgot the stocks and pillories.
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #40 on: May 13, 2008, 23:39:37 »

You forgot the stocks and pillories.

Probably

But given the vitriol on here against people with no ticket ..........


Its a valid solution
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: May 14, 2008, 09:15:32 »

To prevent repeated usage of such tickets where it is unlikely you will get a ticket check.

Is there any evidence that this strategy works?  I can see why open returns, where both portions are valid for a month are open to abuse, but with a saver return, you could in theory use the return portion more than once but as you can only use the outbound portion on the issue date you would have to either make lots of one way journeys or divise a fairly complex scheme of ticket purchasing to cheat with the return portion.  I find it had to believe that this happens to a significant degree.  The logic also assumes that Intercity trains will have more and better ticket checks than locals.  This is not my experience of reality.  Of all the tickets I use, the ones that are least lickly to get stamped are the Bath-London open returns.  At over ^100 a ticket even an honest chap like me would be tempted to reuse them if I wasn't usually on expenses.

   
« Last Edit: May 14, 2008, 09:18:14 by Tim » Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #42 on: May 14, 2008, 10:35:34 »

Consider this.

Two Saver Returns, both dated for the same direction, one from A to B, one from B to A.

Return portions valid allow a "2nd" trip within a 1 month. Wink And a third if it's not gripped, and a fourth.... and a fifth...
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #43 on: May 14, 2008, 10:57:07 »

Consider this.

Two Saver Returns, both dated for the same direction, one from A to B, one from B to A.

Return portions valid allow a "2nd" trip within a 1 month. Wink And a third if it's not gripped, and a fourth.... and a fifth...


But since we've concluded that most fare dodgers are too thick to even work out getting a ticket to the next station to get through the barriers, they are surely going to too thick to work this out as well.

Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #44 on: May 14, 2008, 10:58:49 »

You'd be surprised.

I've seen a number of people trying this trick - successfully....
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page