FoSBR» has a different task now. The argument is (currently!) going our way. Rather than fighting closures and service reductions, we are trying to speed up openings and service improvements. We have the previous generation of campaigners to thank for being in this position.
I'm sorry, but you cant simply characterise FoSBR campaigners from back then as only fighting closures and service reductions, while today's FoSBR campaigners are the ones trying to speed up openings and service improvements.
For example, If it hadn't been for Cat Hobbs devising a plan to improve services on the Severn Beach Line back then, and a brilliant campaigning plan to see it through to completion, you wouldn't have anything like the level of service on that route that you have today.
Similarly, people forget that Joe Patrick devised a plan to renovate and expand services and facilities at Pilning long before the current incarnation of Pilning Station Group was born and began its superb modern day campaigning work.
Last but not least, back then when Julie Boston was out and about doing all those wonderful unsung campaigning tasks, she would invariably also be handing out leaflets that showed FoSBR's future plans for rail in great detail - It's certainly not a new direction for FoSBR to be taking now campaigning-wise!
The fact is that people like me and representatives of other user groups were constantly working with and alongside FoSBR during those difficult days. What people today might not realise with the passing of time was that our experience fighting the negative proposals being put forward also greatly spurred us on to push for far better things in the future.
Gateway To The Future is an good example of that. Written jointly by Save The Train, FoSBR,
CANBER▸ and others in the midst of the darkest days of 2007, it set out a hugely ambitious blueprint for the future of rail travel in our region.
To a very large extent though, I have said my piece on this subject. I have in the past questioned the future direction of FoSBR on this forum, and I do believe I have earned the right to express an opinion on that, without it being seen as an unduly negative move on my part. It is also true that the aims and aspirations since put forward by current FoSBR members such as Red Squirrel have largely addressed my concerns, and as an overall blueprint there is very little I would disagree with, and the vast majority I would very much endorse.
It is still my opinion that FoSBR has seen better days, but I also agree with Red Squirrel that the best may yet still be to come. I genuinely and wholeheartedly hope that the latter comes to pass.