There is an initial report on this from DNV*.
The report itself is of course in Spanish (though I suspect it was written in English and translated!), but has loads of pictures and some sense can be made of those using the NYT report.
The BBC» has a report, but that link comes courtesy of the
NY Times, which has a more detailed report. Basically, it was shoddy construction:
MEXICO CITY — Construction errors led to the May collapse of an overpass in Mexico City’s subway system that killed 26 people and injured scores more, according to the preliminary results of an independent investigation released by the city’s government on Wednesday.
The report, produced by the Norwegian risk management company DNV, suggests that serious problems with the welding and placement of metal studs, linchpins of the entire structure, directly contributed to the collapse.
“We can preliminarily state that the incident was caused by a structural failure,” the report said, citing “deficiencies in the construction process.”
The results support the findings of a New York Times investigation that highlighted shoddy construction on the metro line. Some of the studs holding the structure together appeared to have failed because of bad welds, The Times found, a crucial mistake that probably caused the overpass to give way.
A Times investigation shows the serious construction flaws and political pressure behind a tragedy that threatens two of Mexico’s most prominent figures.
Engineers consulted by The Times pointed to the presence of ceramic rings, or ferrules, left in place after the welding process, and to irregularly placed studs as evidence of subpar workmanship — findings that were confirmed by the DNV investigation.
Its report documented a “failure to remove the protective ceramic” around the studs, which “reduced the area of adhesion” with the concrete that held up the tracks. Too few studs were used to fuse the structure together, and their placement was inconsistent, something that “contradicts the design” of the overpass, the report said, echoing another finding of the Times investigation.
* DNV are the "Norwegian Lloyds", and originally a ship classification society and shipping registrar. Having broadened their techinical field of operations (to railway infrastructure, but not only that) there don't seem to be any good labels for their current business. So the BBC call them "auditor", the NY Times says "risk management company" - maybe "Like Veritas" is as good as anything!