Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
08:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
09:25 Par to Newquay
10:09 Gloucester to Westbury
Additional 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Delayed
07:45 London Paddington to Great Malvern
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 10:43 Fratton to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 09:19:30 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] 44 45 ... 50
  Print  
Author Topic: Problems with IET trains from April 2021  (Read 146240 times)
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 989



View Profile
« Reply #630 on: August 01, 2023, 15:34:01 »


Quite apart from the folly of suggesting a 12% reduction in standard class seating at a time where some leisure trains are already packed to the rafters, I'd love to see a crayonista make that work as an actual working design!

No problem,  GWR (Great Western Railway) are experts at making that happen. GWR promised "more seats" for Portsmouth - Cardiff, they did manage that.............with 5 abreast seating rolling stock instead of 4 abreast !!!!!  The fact that most of these "extra" seats are unusable by normal sized human beings - we'll ignore that.  Average journey time London to Swansea is about 30 mins less than Portsmouth to Cardiff..............could almost manage 6 abreast seating for that short trip  Cheesy

I would say that GWR are trying to emulate Ryanair - but they are actually way ahead already. Michael O'Leary has merely floated the idea of having standing passengers on his Boeings - GWR have already achieved that on most of their trains already.
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1110


View Profile
« Reply #631 on: August 01, 2023, 19:00:51 »

No problem,  GWR (Great Western Railway) are experts at making that happen. GWR promised "more seats" for Portsmouth - Cardiff, they did manage that.............with 5 abreast seating rolling stock instead of 4 abreast !!!!!  The fact that most of these "extra" seats are unusable by normal sized human beings - we'll ignore that.  Average journey time London to Swansea is about 30 mins less than Portsmouth to Cardiff..............could almost manage 6 abreast seating for that short trip  Cheesy

I would say that GWR are trying to emulate Ryanair - but they are actually way ahead already. Michael O'Leary has merely floated the idea of having standing passengers on his Boeings - GWR have already achieved that on most of their trains already.

You are correct in what you say….. except a lot of the decisions aren’t GWR’s. They are being micromanaged by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and have been for many years.  The DfT calls the shots, they are the ones dictating what happens.

The DfT says the Castle sets have to go. No replacement sorted, stretch the fleet as thin as it’ll go and make it work. This will become more and more apparent.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #632 on: August 01, 2023, 19:35:33 »

No problem,  GWR (Great Western Railway) are experts at making that happen. GWR promised "more seats" for Portsmouth - Cardiff, they did manage that.............with 5 abreast seating rolling stock instead of 4 abreast !!!!!  The fact that most of these "extra" seats are unusable by normal sized human beings - we'll ignore that.  Average journey time London to Swansea is about 30 mins less than Portsmouth to Cardiff..............could almost manage 6 abreast seating for that short trip  Cheesy

I would say that GWR are trying to emulate Ryanair - but they are actually way ahead already. Michael O'Leary has merely floated the idea of having standing passengers on his Boeings - GWR have already achieved that on most of their trains already.

A shame you were also one of our regular posters who were unable/unwilling to directly question the GWR MD with your concerns last week.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1797



View Profile
« Reply #633 on: August 01, 2023, 19:57:53 »

Quote
A shame you were also one of our regular posters who were unable/unwilling to directly question the GWR (Great Western Railway) MD with your concerns last week.

To be fair, II, a-driver has indicated in his post just before yours what the answer would be - it's what DfT» (Department for Transport - about) tells us to do.

Perhaps the next time Mark Harper shows up for a photo opp at a station opening in our area he could be invited to participate in a session with our forum like "our" Mark H to answer these questions?
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #634 on: August 01, 2023, 20:38:51 »

No problem,  GWR (Great Western Railway) are experts at making that happen. GWR promised "more seats" for Portsmouth - Cardiff, they did manage that.............with 5 abreast seating rolling stock instead of 4 abreast !!!!!  The fact that most of these "extra" seats are unusable by normal sized human beings - we'll ignore that.  Average journey time London to Swansea is about 30 mins less than Portsmouth to Cardiff..............could almost manage 6 abreast seating for that short trip  Cheesy

I would say that GWR are trying to emulate Ryanair - but they are actually way ahead already. Michael O'Leary has merely floated the idea of having standing passengers on his Boeings - GWR have already achieved that on most of their trains already.

You are correct in what you say….. except a lot of the decisions aren’t GWR’s. They are being micromanaged by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and have been for many years.  The DfT calls the shots, they are the ones dictating what happens.

The DfT says the Castle sets have to go. No replacement sorted, stretch the fleet as thin as it’ll go and make it work. This will become more and more apparent.


Not sure it is DfT  I suspect the decision is made in the Treasury who of course know so much about everything we wonder why any other government department exists.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8612



View Profile
« Reply #635 on: August 02, 2023, 07:13:20 »

Quote
A shame you were also one of our regular posters who were unable/unwilling to directly question the GWR (Great Western Railway) MD with your concerns last week.

To be fair, II, a-driver has indicated in his post just before yours what the answer would be - it's what DfT» (Department for Transport - about) tells us to do.

Perhaps the next time Mark Harper shows up for a photo opp at a station opening in our area he could be invited to participate in a session with our forum like "our" Mark H to answer these questions?

Just a thought.....perhaps it should be Hopwood challenging Harper.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43848



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #636 on: August 02, 2023, 08:04:00 »

Just a thought.....perhaps it should be Hopwood challenging Harper.

I would suspect that questions have been asked from GWR (Great Western Railway) to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about).

Should we invite Mark Harper to a "Meet the Secretary of State" session?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #637 on: August 02, 2023, 09:46:52 »

Go on, he can only say no. I'd be interested in reading anything more he had to say.
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1110


View Profile
« Reply #638 on: August 02, 2023, 15:36:31 »

Go on, he can only say no. I'd be interested in reading anything more he had to say.

To be fair, as a politician, he’d be incapable of providing a simple yes or no answer!!
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #639 on: August 02, 2023, 15:48:42 »

Yup, my point exactly!
Logged
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1965


View Profile
« Reply #640 on: August 03, 2023, 09:10:07 »


Indeed. Low power. A problem that a number of the fleet are suffering.

Wondering if LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) are also experiencing this, with theirs.

Mark
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #641 on: August 03, 2023, 10:05:21 »


Indeed. Low power. A problem that a number of the fleet are suffering.

Wondering if LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) are also experiencing this, with theirs.

Mark

Their diesel mileage percentage must be quite a bit lower. 

You don’t really notice an engine out on a 9 or 10-car service anyway though.  You do notice if two or more are our, but that’s fairly rare IME ('in my experience').
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1110


View Profile
« Reply #642 on: August 03, 2023, 10:44:50 »


Indeed. Low power. A problem that a number of the fleet are suffering.

Wondering if LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) are also experiencing this, with theirs.

Mark

Their diesel mileage percentage must be quite a bit lower. 

You don’t really notice an engine out on a 9 or 10-car service anyway though.  You do notice if two or more are our, but that’s fairly rare IME ('in my experience').

LNER have two sets with an engine isolated, but as IndustryInsider said, they spend most of the time under the wires.

You notice 1 engine out on the steeper gradients on the network and where linespeeds are 100/110mph.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43848



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #643 on: August 03, 2023, 12:35:03 »

Just a thought.....perhaps it should be Hopwood challenging Harper.

I would suspect that questions have been asked from GWR (Great Western Railway) to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about).

Should we invite Mark Harper to a "Meet the Secretary of State" session?

Go on, he can only say no. I'd be interested in reading anything more he had to say.

Having checked around with the moderator / admin team (onto whom the organising would fall), we have gone ahead and sent an invite.  It was actually quite a useful exercise in defining the Coffee Shop to an expert newcomer.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6604


View Profile
« Reply #644 on: August 04, 2023, 11:24:15 »

This service is making extra stops and picking up passengers (somehow I don’t think it will) from the cancelled 08:35 Plymouth-Paddington. What a time for this to be a 5 vice 10 if JC is correct  Roll Eyes

Quote
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington due 12:29 will be diverted between Castle Cary and Pewsey.
It will call additionally at Castle Cary, Westbury and Pewsey.
It will be delayed due to the diversion and is expected to be 10 minutes late.
This is due to the train making extra stops because a train was cancelled.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 10 from Plymouth.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] 44 45 ... 50
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page