|
patch38
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2020, 15:00:56 » |
|
3 looks like Kemble but with the original Cirencester and Tetbury branches in-situ.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2020, 15:06:51 » |
|
3 looks like Kemble but with the original Cirencester and Tetbury branches in-situ.
Yes - the thin black lines are "disused", "abandoned" and "razed" in the database; other railway features are thickened.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Richard Fairhurst
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2020, 16:01:10 » |
|
I like this. Could name a few of them but for my "one each at first" it does, of course, have to be 6 - Charlbury.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2020, 16:04:44 » |
|
I like this. Could name a few of them but for my "one each at first" it does, of course, have to be 6 - Charlbury.
It IS fun, isn't it! Yes - Charlbury. Setting them up, I am learning a lot about places!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Hafren
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2020, 16:09:47 » |
|
7 looks like Whitland
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TonyN
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2020, 17:06:05 » |
|
No 1 Marlow
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AMLAG
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2020, 17:10:10 » |
|
4 = Lympstone Commando
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eXPassenger
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2020, 17:53:22 » |
|
No 2 - Paddington.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2020, 18:03:52 » |
|
All right ... there's no doubt with a map, is there!
I will paste in correct answers and links in initial post
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2020, 18:10:01 » |
|
No. 8 would be Melksham - mandatory if there's no Taunton?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Western Pathfinder
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2020, 19:06:59 » |
|
WOT.no Pilning!...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eightonedee
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2020, 22:23:35 » |
|
I think 9 is Havant - presumably gets trains that go on to Brighton?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2020, 23:23:43 » |
|
I think 9 is Havant - presumably gets trains that go on to Brighton?
Yes ... Havant and Melksham; just numbers 5 and 10 remaining. I find these maps fascinating - from seeing the lay of the land and catchments around stations to the tracks of old lines and the conversion to a cycle way like in Havant to where the underground runs under Paddington. Very tempted to go have a look-see in some places that look interesting on the map when that's allowed once again. Much easier to put together than a "spot the difference" too!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
|
|