Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:55 19 Apr 2025
 
- Race Across the World winner on 'authentic travel' and how to do it
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
20/04/25 20:11 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2025, 00:10:35 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[95] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[94] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[72] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[62] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[56] Across the South West over Easter - trains in pictures
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Arriva Trains Weymouth  (Read 13005 times)
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2010, 21:05:44 »

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I noticed 150278 in the sidings at Westbury today (about 3pm).

Are FGW (First Great Western) hiring rolling stock from ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former Train Operating Company)) and then leaving it unused?  What routes/times do they actually use the ATW set(s)?  I've noticed one operating the SVB line occasionally.

they do not run any particular diagram  they are used the same as rest of FGW dmu fleet.
the one at WSB» (Westbury - next trains) sidings was probably the booked terminator in morning then stables for the afternoon/evening trans wilts service,even if they did not have the ATW sets this would be the same just a booked thing.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2010, 22:22:26 »

Its only going to get worse in the main holiday period school holidays ect at least on the southern line they get proper trains even if they are 444

No! I wont have that  Roll Eyes Wink Cheesy

the last proper train that ran on the southern line to Weymouth was the class 442.

A CIG and VEP last visited Weymouth instead of 442 Wink
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2010, 22:42:13 »

OK. The last proper train that regularly ran on the southern to Weymouth...... Tongue Wink
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19554



View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2010, 22:52:12 »

... or "ran regularly" ... we don't want to give TerminalJunkie apoplexy!  Shocked
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2010, 23:20:46 »

Hopefully TJ will explain why something can have a regular run but when we switch to the adverb of regular and past tense of run we have to switch them round  Undecided
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19554



View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2010, 23:25:05 »

I dunno either - but we'll boldly go where no man has gone before!  Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2010, 23:35:52 »

Or will we go boldly where no man has before gone?  Tongue Wink

I'll stop now.  Grin
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Kingfisherdart
Full Member
***
Posts: 61



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2010, 23:41:41 »

Just to make things more confusing, would I be correct in thinking the last proper train to run *regularly* to Weymouth, was the once a week class 67 + Mk2 (Mark 2 coach) service during the summer....?
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2010, 23:43:52 »

Depends on whether you deem "skips" to be a proper train... Now, the occasion when it was top-and-tailed by two 37s, of course...
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2010, 00:14:40 »

Depends on whether you deem "skips" to be a proper train... Now, the occasion when it was top-and-tailed by two 37s, of course...

We have a winner!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhnUj_Aj_y8

Although apparently double-headed, rather than top-and-tailed.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43849



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #25 on: March 01, 2010, 06:23:57 »

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I noticed 150278 in the sidings at Westbury today (about 3pm).

Are FGW (First Great Western) hiring rolling stock from ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former Train Operating Company)) and then leaving it unused?  What routes/times do they actually use the ATW set(s)?  I've noticed one operating the SVB line occasionally.

they do not run any particular diagram  they are used the same as rest of FGW dmu fleet.
the one at WSB» (Westbury - next trains) sidings was probably the booked terminator in morning then stables for the afternoon/evening trans wilts service,even if they did not have the ATW sets this would be the same just a booked thing.

The train (diagram) in question could perhaps be usefully used to provide additional round trips on the TransWilts rather than just lying idle for a considerable time;  the Sunday TransWilts service has not been much mentioned but it also needs dramatic improvement - the first train of the day not running until after 5 p.m. making it utterly impractical for almost any days out / round trips.

After all that wating around yesterday, the train didn't actually run up from Trowbridge to Chippenham direct, providing the large intermediate town with its only trains of the day ... so the meagre three trains we were due got reduced to zero at the last minute yet again (I'm loosing count - I think it must have been the 4th or 5th trainless day in 2 months).

Back on more general topic - the whole Sunday Service thing needs review; early services are sparse and overcrowded, and I think there's probably a pent-up / potential travel requirement for travel by train that's put off by the services being too few.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: March 01, 2010, 09:24:57 »


the last proper train that ran on the southern line to Weymouth was the class 442.

Nope class 33 and 4/8 TC (Train Crew, or Travelling Chef, depending on context) and before that MNs.
Logged
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 01, 2010, 10:39:49 »

... or "ran regularly" ... we don't want to give TerminalJunkie apoplexy!  Shocked

I don't do apoplexy. You're obviously confusing me with Btline Tongue

I dunno either - but we'll boldly go where no man has gone before!  Grin

You can't split a bare infinitive, boldly or otherwise. The full infinitive is to go, and without the particle to you only have a bare infinitive.

In any case, the split infinitive rule is just an invention of a few 19th century Grammar Nazis. Since in most cases splitting the infinitive results in a natural flow of words there's no real reason to avoid it.

Hopefully TJ will explain why something can have a regular run but when we switch to the adverb of regular and past tense of run we have to switch them round  Undecided

Sorry, I've no idea why you feel the need to do that. It seems to makes perfect sense either way!
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page