There was a thread elsewhere, link below, that discusses this, although not specifically flourescent lamps.
Looks like LED's are a very positive, power saving factor, for heritage stock, if colour match can be achieved. An LED uses half the power of a flourescent, and a tenth of an incandescent lamp for the same lumens output.
https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/internal-lighting-of-heritage-coaches.103377/OTC
There is a great deal to be said for replacing incandescent bulbs in railway coaches with LEDs, the power saving and improved light is most welcome.
The night time gloom in many heritage railway coaches is not very appealing ! and no it is not authentic. When such stock was in regular mainline use, the correct bulbs were fitted, often 24 volt, 25 watt, and of a type designed for reasonably efficient illumination.
Unfortunately the correct bulbs are seldom used today. The tendency is to use either "bus bulbs" of 22 watts rating, these are by convention called "24 volt" but are actually designed for about 28 volts, that being the voltage on a bus when the engine is running and the battery is on charge. A 28 volt bulb run at 24 volts gives a miserable light.
Even worse are 25 volt 15 watt pygmy bulbs, these are intended for use as indicator or warning lamps and not for illumination, and also give a miserable light.
A 3 watt LED will give a similar light to the originally intended bulbs, and a great deal more light than bus bulbs or pilot lamps. They give a constant light over a wide voltage range.
However this thread is about the declining availability of FLUORESCENT TUBES as used in some later
BR▸ era coaches. There is no SIMPLE way to substitute LEDs in such cases.
Many suppliers offer linear LED tubes that are claimed to replace fluorescent lamps, but these are generally compatible with mains voltage fittings and wont work from the 24/25 volt supply found on many trains.