Conner
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 11, 2008, 16:45:27 » |
|
It is now properly advertised and has ammendments available as well.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 11, 2008, 20:10:22 » |
|
It is now properly advertised and has ammendments available as well.
And my haven't FGW▸ improved in their timetable production? There are now very few ammendments needed which is a huge improvement on a couple of years ago. Well done FGW!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 11, 2008, 20:48:33 » |
|
At the risk of offending two of our global moderators, maybe "amendments"?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
|
« Reply #18 on: April 11, 2008, 21:25:29 » |
|
maybe "amendments"?
I can only spell when I write ot when I type, when I write I have brilliant spelling but I can't spell at all when I type.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #19 on: April 11, 2008, 21:39:09 » |
|
Why does a train not call at Charlbury? I was under the impression that Charlbury was one of the most important stops. Mistake: Some trains are given 4 mins between departing Worcester Shrub Hill and arriving at Foregate Street! 2 mins is fine for most trains, perhaps 3 mins for HSTs▸ as they are slower, but not 4 mins!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #20 on: April 11, 2008, 21:39:58 » |
|
It's the difference between the public and working timetable coming into play on that one.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
smokey
|
|
« Reply #22 on: April 12, 2008, 11:42:23 » |
|
Timetable B has an error and a couple of weird bits. Summer Saturdays has a 12:50 PNZ-PLY» with First Class, Resrvations and a Buffet but is not a HST▸ .
Now wouldn't it make the Saturday 12.50 PNZ-PLY a Train spotters favorite IF this train was formed of the Day cars from the Night Sleeper and Class 57 haulage. A proper train! BR▸ used to use the Day Cars like this for a PNZ-PLY, and 14.50 PLY-PNZ return working years ago. It was a real MONEY earner with the Rail Enthusiasts.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #23 on: April 12, 2008, 13:22:21 » |
|
Timetable B has an error and a couple of weird bits. Summer Saturdays has a 12:50 PNZ-PLY» with First Class, Resrvations and a Buffet but is not a HST▸ .
Now wouldn't it make the Saturday 12.50 PNZ-PLY a Train spotters favorite IF this train was formed of the Day cars from the Night Sleeper and Class 57 haulage. A proper train! BR▸ used to use the Day Cars like this for a PNZ-PLY, and 14.50 PLY-PNZ return working years ago. It was a real MONEY earner with the Rail Enthusiasts. Class 57 and "real" train??? only for someone who's sad enough to bash 57's!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #24 on: April 12, 2008, 20:23:41 » |
|
In all fairness Vacman, what else is there left?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #25 on: April 12, 2008, 21:22:46 » |
|
In all fairness Vacman, what else is there left?
What, in preference to a 57? well where do I start, 142, 153........................
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #26 on: April 12, 2008, 21:26:30 » |
|
How about a 37?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #27 on: April 12, 2008, 21:29:59 » |
|
How about a 37? Oh yes! my point is that anything is better than a 57!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
swlines
|
|
« Reply #28 on: April 12, 2008, 21:33:42 » |
|
Apart from a 66 ... or a 67?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #29 on: April 12, 2008, 21:40:28 » |
|
In all fairness Vacman, what else is there left?
What, in preference to a 57? well where do I start, 142, 153........................ Pwaoooar DESPERATE
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|