Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:35 London Paddington to Paignton
14:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
15:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
16:23 London Paddington to Oxford
16:31 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
Short Run
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:15 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
14:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
14:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:53 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
15:08 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:12 London Paddington to Newbury
15:14 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:55 Newbury to London Paddington
16:05 London Paddington to Newbury
16:07 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
16:34 Newbury to London Paddington
16:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:05 London Paddington to Newbury
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 15:31:06 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[110] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[98] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[53] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[52] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[46] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[25] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Railway Crossing with a Difference  (Read 5870 times)
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 17, 2020, 19:49:34 »

The cane railway's pivots sound like they need greasing!
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 17, 2020, 19:53:02 »

On a slightly different theme, here's an unusual shared bridge/level crossing in New Zealand:

https://youtu.be/sstRJcaFU9U


I've traversed that bridge - both on the train and in a 4x4 as part of a tour. The commentary on the train told us about it Grin
I've been over a bridge like that in NZ but it wasn't the same one. I was in someone's car.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7371


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 17, 2020, 19:57:51 »

That just has so much OMG (Oh My doG ) on me. The interlocking and proving must be a nightmare - and the failure case in either direction is catastrophic. What are your views?

I'd be most bothered about proving in the up position, since the main-line trains as much faster - and carry people. It's not enough to detect the bit near he motor has rotated to the correct position, you also need to know the whole of the rest is still attached. Even small bits of metal dropped off onto the track would be scary. I can't see anything that does that - perhaps some photocell arrangement could do it, mostly at least.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 17, 2020, 21:25:03 »

That just has so much OMG (Oh My doG ) on me. The interlocking and proving must be a nightmare - and the failure case in either direction is catastrophic. What are your views?

I'd be most bothered about proving in the up position, since the main-line trains as much faster - and carry people. It's not enough to detect the bit near he motor has rotated to the correct position, you also need to know the whole of the rest is still attached. Even small bits of metal dropped off onto the track would be scary. I can't see anything that does that - perhaps some photocell arrangement could do it, mostly at least.

No different to the switch rails on a conventional set of points.  The tips are detected in the correct position but not the remainder of the switch rail unless its over a certain length (usually higher speed turnouts).
« Last Edit: April 18, 2020, 10:08:47 by SandTEngineer » Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2020, 22:13:31 »

Another very unusual level crossing. Seven lane highway crossed by freight trains. No lights, no barriers.

https://youtu.be/u4hed723pd8
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 18, 2020, 10:05:44 »

And the rather scary idea of road and rail sharing the same tunnel - not side by side, but on the same trackbed.  Does the last car through carry a tail lamp, or is there axle-counting in and out?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhbH-hVlHe4

Edit later re relevance to current topic – the road enters the tunnel from the right of the railway, and exits to the left, so my humble submission is that the road is crossing the railway and it is therefore a “railway crossing with a difference” (!)
« Last Edit: April 18, 2020, 12:09:57 by Gordon the Blue Engine » Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2020, 11:09:00 »

That just has so much OMG (Oh My doG ) on me. The interlocking and proving must be a nightmare - and the failure case in either direction is catastrophic. What are your views?

I'd be most bothered about proving in the up position, since the main-line trains as much faster - and carry people. It's not enough to detect the bit near he motor has rotated to the correct position, you also need to know the whole of the rest is still attached. Even small bits of metal dropped off onto the track would be scary. I can't see anything that does that - perhaps some photocell arrangement could do it, mostly at least.

No different to the switch rails on a conventional set of points.  The tips are detected in the correct position but not the remainder of the switch rail unless its over a certain length (usually higher speed turnouts).

I think I'm more concerned about the lack of overlap on the cane railway signals protecting the crossing.  The trains look to be unbraked, and although sugar cane is light the trains are long.  I have this vision of a rainy day and the driver applying the loco brakes, the wheels pick up, and the train slides slowly past the signal....
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: April 18, 2020, 11:20:07 »

Unfortunately New Zealand does have a number of crossing accidents, but typical Kiwi's they  tend to shrug them off.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43078



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #23 on: April 18, 2020, 11:29:02 »

Road and rail sharing is something we've come across before ... rather off topic from the origins of this thread though.

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=20431.msg249578#msg249578

In this case, safety seem to have gone to the other extreme, with the shared section initially closed to road traffic any time a train was in the Strathcarron to Kyle of Lochalsh section - some 20 miles.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 18, 2020, 13:13:04 »

That just has so much OMG (Oh My doG ) on me. The interlocking and proving must be a nightmare - and the failure case in either direction is catastrophic. What are your views?

I'd be most bothered about proving in the up position, since the main-line trains as much faster - and carry people. It's not enough to detect the bit near he motor has rotated to the correct position, you also need to know the whole of the rest is still attached. Even small bits of metal dropped off onto the track would be scary. I can't see anything that does that - perhaps some photocell arrangement could do it, mostly at least.

No different to the switch rails on a conventional set of points.  The tips are detected in the correct position but not the remainder of the switch rail unless its over a certain length (usually higher speed turnouts).

I think I'm more concerned about the lack of overlap on the cane railway signals protecting the crossing.  The trains look to be unbraked, and although sugar cane is light the trains are long.  I have this vision of a rainy day and the driver applying the loco brakes, the wheels pick up, and the train slides slowly past the signal....

I think I said before that there appear to be catch points each side of the crossing on the Sugercane line.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page