The economic problems with specialist carriages - some hinted at in comments above ...
... they are only really used for small parts of the day (drink at the "Hedgehog and Carrot" on your way into work on the 06:30?) and are awkward to diagram
... they carry fewer passengers per metre / yard of carriage
... they require a higher level of specialist staffing
and I wonder (briefly) how the 153 recreation carriages are going to work on the West Highland line; probably not too bad against those criteria; probably useful on all trains, and no extra staff needed (I don't think the plan to have travelling engineers to service bicycles during the journey lasted beyond midday on 1st April).
It's looking at loadings like this that have me realise just how fortunate we are on the Coffee Shop ... with a loading profile that would make any
TOC▸ jealous ... from Easter 2019, and Easter 2020. Figures are sessions per hour; numbers down a little in 2020 over 2019 due to a reduced number of guests - but our drop in "casual" visitors pales into insignificance beside the railways drop in "casual" (optional travel) customers.
As is well known, I am a fan of on train catering.
I doubt the accuracy of todays mantra about the little use made of such facilities and the excessive costs.
The modern tendency is towards fixed formation multiple unit trains,
IETs▸ and the like. There is no real reason why a long fixed formation unit could not incorporate a proper buffet.
If reliably provided and offering a suitable choice of refreshment, such a facility would be well used in both rush hours.
Only a few diehards want alcoholic drink in the morning rush hour, but there is a demand for real coffee, bacon rolls, and related products in the morning peak, with alcohol and "pub snacks" being popular in the evening peak.
As regards the oft quoted space "wasted" by catering, I am not convinced.
A standard class IET vehicle has about 88 seats. It should be possible to design a new IET buffet car with a large central servery and longitudinal seating at each end with a total capacity of about 45.
At busy times, many customers would CHOOSE to stand in such a facility, just as many stand in public houses, despite seats being available. If about 45 people stand THROUGH CHOICE in the rush hours, then the total passenger capacity would be similar to a standard class seated coach.
I doubt that those standing in the old tavern cars complained about this !
For those unaware, my objections to the IETs are primarily the effective absence of catering and the hard seats. I don't object to the principle of bi mode operation, indeed I consider this to be a considerable advantage.
Add a buffet car, and fit padded seats, and I would consider them acceptable modern trains.