May I ask where the meeting was held,and was an open meeting?
In a board room in Bristol. And very much the feeling / size / composition / approach of a board meeting too. A lot of very fine tuning work (mostly results of previous inputs/meetings) coming back to the table, and putting in local authority,
CRP▸ and community umbrella (such as TravelWatch SouthWest) responses. A group of knowledgable, well informed and understanding people all pulling in the same direction, and appreciating committee / board collective responsibility toward sensible pragmatic outcomes. There are 3 or 4 regional meetings like this gone / going on, and others will follow to lead up to future timetable changes.
For the area I know (broadly services operated out of St Phillips Marsh and High Speed services that call at the stations in that area) some excellent outcomes - suggestions have really been listened to and acted on where it's clearly in spec and in everyone's interest, with other things that can't be achieved this time informing future direction and allowing people to keep an eye on following steps, trying to avoid suggestions that would block them. All sounds very much like verbiage, I know ... take a look at my review at
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/22002 as a very narrow Melksham look and compare it back to some of the severe worries I was expressing a couple of months back. Much improved - thank you
GWR▸ - not perfect and some losses but also some cases where advantage is taken of opportunities and on balance steps forward for the future.
South Wales is not my 'home patch' railwise, and the geographic spread of the meeting differed from previous ones - hence my discussion starter thread looking at stuff that's now in the public domain via Real Time Trains and similar sources. And I did understand from the meeting that those South Wales interests are co-ordinated much along the line that the greater Bristol / greater Wessex (Western Gateway area?) folks are.
From Cardiff to Swansea, it used be that the London - Swansea train and the Manchester - Swansea - West Wales service together provided a service that was any every half hour, but now the planned service westbound looks lopsided
Eh? I don't think it is every half hour even now. Currently, the eastbound services (Swansea
to Cardiff) are close to half-hourly ...
Correct - the concern is westbound becoming even less even than it is now.
4. Connections from Bristol to Chepstow and Lydney at Severn Tunnel Junction are - err - poor. And this is a very fast growing flow with people starting to live across the Severn and commute into Bristol. Could not some of the Portsmouth trains call at STJ▸ ?
Ideally there would be an hourly Swansea-Bristol as well and this would be at half-hour offsets from the Cardiff-Taunton in both directions with both the Swansea and Taunton trains serving Severn Tunnel Junction, Cardiff Parkway, Patchway etc. giving those stations a half-hourly service to/from Bristol. The Portsmouth service could then run non-stop (or perhaps just Filton) from Newport to Bristol Temple Meads. Primarily for electrification reasons, I'd also transfer the Cardiff-Bristol leg of the Taunton services to TfW, with the Taunton trains extended to Gloucester/Malvern instead of Cardiff.
The Bristol to Lyndey and Chepstow flow, and ticketing / permitted route topics were something I was personally only vaguely aware of. Change at Severn Tunnel Junction, at Newport, or at Gloucester? Which stations and nice ones to change at and how long do you have to wait? What do online timetable planning tools offer? There probably is a case for adding a further service in the Bristol - Newport timetable -
SEWWEB suggested that in the hourly pattern timetables and the more I look at that the more I think it's along the right lines. Also consider the open access suggestion for Cardiff to London that stops at Severn Tunnel Junction - though that will point from there toward a new (London) destination rather that strengthening the regional link to Bristol.
On stopping (more) Cardiff - Portsmouth trains at Severn Tunnel Junction - yes, that came up. Just as discussed elsewhere (Heart of Wessex board) recently, we have a single service looking to perform multiple tasks and various compromises, with a suggestion that flow size and capacity of lines both mitigate against running each task as a separate train.