Oxonhutch
|
|
« Reply #30 on: March 03, 2019, 13:08:02 » |
|
Am I right in thinking that the Wallingford and Watlington branches were originally going to form part of such a route?
Correct: - the Wallingford and Watlington Railway. Unfortunately it ran out of financial breath before it could get past Wallingford on its way from the junction at Wallingford Road station.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
caliwag
|
|
« Reply #31 on: March 03, 2019, 13:29:48 » |
|
Out of Curiosity what is DN & S...I'm from Scotland!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Oxonhutch
|
|
« Reply #32 on: March 03, 2019, 13:44:26 » |
|
Didcot, Newbury and Southampton Railway
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
caliwag
|
|
« Reply #33 on: March 03, 2019, 14:01:57 » |
|
Ah, cheers...didn't think Dundee, Newtyle and Strathord was appropriate
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5447
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #34 on: March 03, 2019, 17:29:45 » |
|
Interesting to look at Beeching's analysis of the S&D▸ route - he shows the route from Bath to Templecombe as having similar traffic levels to the Westbury - Salisbury route, though beyond Templecombe traffic was rather lighter. I wonder if these two routes were considered close enough to be duplicates? In a similar vein, the S&D route from Templecombe to Bournemouth may have been considered a duplicate of the Yeovil - Dorchester route... it would have been interesting to be a fly on the wall when these decisions were made! I have the feeling that the S&D may have suffered from being historically associated with two of the Western's rivals.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
Oxonhutch
|
|
« Reply #35 on: March 03, 2019, 19:36:29 » |
|
Old company rivalry knows no bounds. Once their operations fall into your hands, you owe it to your corporate memory to see them dead, dead, dead!!
Cornish/Devon branches passed to the Western - Which ones were closed? The Great Central - Passed to the Midland. The S&D▸ to the Western.
Didn't matter which might have been the best route - the rival must die - and now we have the power at last. That'll learn 'em!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #36 on: March 03, 2019, 20:02:04 » |
|
... The S&D▸ to the Western ...
and the Midland and South West Junction and the Didcot, Newbury and Southampton
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
bradshaw
|
|
« Reply #37 on: March 03, 2019, 20:52:30 » |
|
And from c1964 the Southern routes west of Salisbury to the GWR▸ , including the ‘witherered arm’ . It was Gerald Feinnes, in his ‘How to run a railway’, explained how the Salisbury - Exeter was saved.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Oberon
|
|
« Reply #38 on: March 03, 2019, 22:06:28 » |
|
I seem to recall Gerry Feinnes was instrumental not only in saving Salisbury-Exeter but also the Berks & Hants as a through route. Without him all would go through Bath. Imagine that in 2019! But I suppose had things been left entirely to Beeching everything west of Exeter would have closed too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #39 on: March 03, 2019, 22:45:37 » |
|
I seem to recall Gerry Feinnes was instrumental not only in saving Salisbury-Exeter but also the Berks & Hants as a through route. Without him all would go through Bath. Imagine that in 2019! But I suppose had things been left entirely to Beeching everything west of Exeter would have closed too.
There are various interesting speculations we could make of how the network could be different though perhaps with a similar mileage to today. But I suspect we could find it getting pretty heated.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
jamestheredengine
|
|
« Reply #40 on: March 04, 2019, 08:02:18 » |
|
... The S&D▸ to the Western ...
and the Midland and South West Junction and the Didcot, Newbury and Southampton and the Llanelly Railway and Dock's Swansea Extension
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5447
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #41 on: March 04, 2019, 10:17:32 » |
|
I seem to recall Gerry Feinnes was instrumental not only in saving Salisbury-Exeter but also the Berks & Hants as a through route. Without him all would go through Bath. Imagine that in 2019! But I suppose had things been left entirely to Beeching everything west of Exeter would have closed too.
There are various interesting speculations we could make of how the network could be different though perhaps with a similar mileage to today. But I suspect we could find it getting pretty heated. Very likely! But we are where we are. This question of Shepton Mallet has set some interesting hares running in my mind, though... The traffic density maps in Beeching's report (which I'll shamelessly link to again here) obviously reflect a different era, but they do give some indication of the relative loadings of various routes. The Oxford to Cambridge route shows similar traffic levels to the Somerset and Dorset and fulfilled a similar role, linking two provincial centres of economic activity. I'm aware of various heritage groups operating along the S&D▸ route who would like to see it reopened, but I'm not aware of anyone having done a proper economic analysis into the benefits of a high-quality rail link between Bristol/Bath and Bournemouth/Poole. I doubt whether the Shepton Mallet report will consider much beyond East Somerset, but maybe someone should!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
johnneyw
|
|
« Reply #42 on: March 04, 2019, 11:07:22 » |
|
I would be very interesting to be able to see just what Mendip DC▸ propose to look at as far as railway/station opening goes in this forthcoming report. Just a rough idea as to the scope of this part of the report could be quite revealing.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bmblbzzz
|
|
« Reply #43 on: March 04, 2019, 11:18:01 » |
|
Oxford and Cambridge could be expected to generate a significant number of journeys from one to the other (and from both to London, the three together supposedly making the golden triangle that will rescue the whole country) as they're centres of similar types of economy. Is the same true of Bristol/Bath and Bournemouth/Poole? Maybe, I don't know.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5447
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #44 on: March 04, 2019, 12:38:02 » |
|
Oxford and Cambridge could be expected to generate a significant number of journeys from one to the other (and from both to London, the three together supposedly making the golden triangle that will rescue the whole country) as they're centres of similar types of economy. Is the same true of Bristol/Bath and Bournemouth/Poole? Maybe, I don't know.
Yes, they're not the same - the main similarity is that they were once connected by cross-country routes with moderate traffic levels. However: - A Bristol - Bournemouth route would link WECA» 's a population of around 900,000 with BCP's 380,000. For comparison, Oxford has 240,000 and Cambridge 280,000.
- Bournemouth, like Bristol, has a strong financial service sector and (I will admit that I am surprised to read) a thriving youth culture. Unlike Bristol, it has poor transport links with its hinterland.
Who's for 'Western Powerhouse Rail'?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
|