Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:35 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:48 Newquay to Par
08:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
09:25 Par to Newquay
10:09 Gloucester to Westbury
Additional 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Delayed
07:45 London Paddington to Great Malvern
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 10:43 Fratton to Portsmouth Harbour
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 08:48:46 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Can anyone ID this?  (Read 3782 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43847



View Profile WWW Email
« on: March 09, 2008, 11:58:15 »

Question (competiton style) in header



And when you have, what can we learn from it?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6604


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2008, 12:01:06 »

Beeching report?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43847



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2008, 12:02:29 »

Beeching report?

Correct ... and showing what by the different types of lines?  Wink
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2008, 12:11:42 »

Jjust relooked at my set of Beeching maps.

Beeching Map No.2 showing density of freight  traffic.

Compared withMap 1 passenger traffic it's the split at Thingley Junction between 10,00 & 50,000 tons a week from Swindon and 5000 to 10000 on each branch which is the give away.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2008, 12:20:05 by eightf48544 » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43847



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2008, 12:25:15 »

Correct (after the edit).  I was interested in it showing (ballpark) the same amount of traffic going each way at Thingley ... and also the relative traffic on lines to Weymouth, the Didcot to Winchester line and the Somerset and Dorset.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2008, 12:36:50 »

Weymouth quayside line was still in use, early tomatoes, Jersey Royals etc still offloaded to rail.

My first job at Waterloo was filing accident reports under Weymouth it was. Car (Reg No) hit by train (date). At least once a week during the summer. We used to think that the shunters had a sweep on who could hit the most cars in a season. Not many people realise how far a Mark 1 swings out on a bend and even though there were striped lines, drivers still thought we were joking being that far out from the rail.

Didcot Winchester was carrying a lot of Fawley oil traffic at that time keeping it off the mainlines to Basingstoke and Reading to Didcot. Including 9Fs.

S&D (Somerset & Dorset Joint Railway) was coal from collieries near Radstock the line was open to Mangotsfield until a spur was put in near Radstock onto Frome line.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2008, 17:23:41 by eightf48544 » Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2008, 12:40:40 »

Of course, there is the question of whether the traffic surveys were accurate :

Here is a letter from former Transport Minister Derek Twigg regarding the Melksham/TransWilts issue, followed by an analysis by grahame (link below.)
http://www.savethetrain.org.uk/melkshamrailway/145_Letter_from_Derek_Twigg.html

Quote from the above link :

Quote from: grahame
"I has seen the statistics quoted by the Department for Transport at the time of the original franchise specification, and noted they were taken over a relatively short period (8 days) which he suspects might have included the Easter weekend. As someone with a University Degree which included a major statistics element, I can assure the minister that a sample of this size is insufficient to be statistically significant - he would need the statistics from around 15 to 20 days, chosen at random throughout the year, to be able to read anything into the figuures that could relate to overall usage on a service which may well have a seasonal element."

Quote from the Beeching Report :

Quote from: Beeching Report
"The traffic surveys, which were made in great detail, extended over only one week, the week ending on 23rd April, 1961, because it was impossible to continue the massive recording effort involved for a longer period. It was realised, therefore, that conclusions about some streams of traffic and about some parts of the system which are affected by seasonal changes could not be based firmly on the traffic surveys alone. Subject to this limitation, however, there can be little doubt about the general reliability of the picture revealed."
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page