Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 19 Apr 2025
 
- Race Across the World winner on 'authentic travel' and how to do it
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
18:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
20:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 21:42:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[108] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[106] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[81] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[71] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[56] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[53] Julia Bradbury: ITV tonight
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 20
  Print  
Author Topic: Trimode cl 769 to operate Reading to Oxford and Gatwick.  (Read 156624 times)
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2139


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #135 on: March 26, 2021, 06:54:38 »

Quote
a trip from Reading Train Care Depot onto the mainline on Wednesday 24th March

Did it happen, and how far did they get?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7425


View Profile
« Reply #136 on: March 26, 2021, 10:54:34 »

Quote
a trip from Reading Train Care Depot onto the mainline on Wednesday 24th March

Did it happen, and how far did they get?

No. But there is now what looks very like a 769 path booked (as FRGT (FReiGhT)) for Monday 29th! Nothing too strenuous mind, just Reading TD-DID (Didcot Parkway)-MAI (Maidenhead station)-Reading TD, so it won't even need to turn the engines on. There are also paths to and from Long Marston, but they are standard preallocations and almost always get cancelled.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2021, 11:25:47 by stuving » Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1798



View Profile
« Reply #137 on: March 26, 2021, 11:24:29 »

Quote
so it won't even need to turn the engines on

Bearing in mind the routes they are currently (no pun intended!) apparently ear-marked for working (North Downs and Reading-Basingstoke) have respectively no and only a short stretch of OHL (Over-Head Line) it seems a bit daft not to do so!
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1454


View Profile
« Reply #138 on: March 29, 2021, 16:15:12 »

Well it did run. (link to GWR (Great Western Railway) twitter_)

Maybe of note that this was publicised after the event when it had completed the run and not before or during Smiley
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1798



View Profile
« Reply #139 on: March 29, 2021, 19:02:39 »

...and if the photo on Twitter is up-to-date, they have not yet applied the grey diagonal stripe and GWR (Great Western Railway) logos yet. Are they hedging their bets if they do not pass their tests?

The rippled carriage sides show well, too.
Logged
RichT54
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #140 on: April 07, 2021, 11:31:29 »

I've just been reading elsewhere that all 3 GWR (Great Western Railway) 769s are out of action today (7/4/21). It was mentioned that if there was only one that was serviceable, then it wouldn't be able to go out because there wouldn't be another 769 to rescue it if it broke down. It makes me wonder that, if they are that unreliable, what is the probability that a rescue 769 would also fail and cause even more disruption?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #141 on: April 07, 2021, 12:26:40 »

Probably quite a small chance, but given having no or very limited rescue capacity should one fail is probably taking an unnecessary risk.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #142 on: April 08, 2021, 11:11:09 »

Another example of the stupid lack of a standard auto coupling.
Logged
RichT54
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #143 on: April 28, 2021, 16:23:57 »

There are comments on railforums saying that one of the 769 test runs today had to be abandoned:

Quote
The original set sustained some damage in the Slough area, reportedly shoegear impacting trackside furniture, which caused other complications so set limped back to Maidenhead where it was rescued back to Reading by another 769.

Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #144 on: April 28, 2021, 20:58:21 »

There are comments on railforums saying that one of the 769 test runs today had to be abandoned:

Quote
The original set sustained some damage in the Slough area, reportedly shoegear impacting trackside furniture, which caused other complications so set limped back to Maidenhead where it was rescued back to Reading by another 769.



Would seem someone had not completed gauge clearance for a third rail unit with non retractable shoe gear, wonder if someone assumed that because 387 run on the GWML (Great Western Main Line) that other third rail stock can  Huh

387's have retractable shoe gear; 769's aka 319's have fixed shoe gear
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
RichT54
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #145 on: May 25, 2021, 15:39:23 »

I read on railforums that one of the 769s did some testing on the third rail at Reading platform 6 today (25/5). So one small step closer to doing some test runs on the North Downs line, perhaps?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7425


View Profile
« Reply #146 on: May 30, 2021, 14:08:07 »

Wedding pictures? Certainly this is both something old and something new, and the drivers at lest are borrowed. And we had loads of something blue yesterday, didn't we?

Two of the 769s at Reading were out last night in Guildford, checking gauging (at the bridge over the Wey west of Shalford, I think). I didn't go out to wave as they passed Wokingham last night (it was midnight), but I certainly heard and saw both of them from the house. None of this third rail nonsense on this trip!

The plan was for one to do a few shuttles from P3 to Shalford while the other one sat in P8 offering moral support and encouragement. But what happened was a bit different: there were at least three trips from P6 and one unit ended up in P8. That left P6 free for the Redhill trains, terminating here as the line to Blackwater was closed until 12:30. 

The return path (597Y) was rather gently paced, and included an hour stopped in Wokingham P2, for some reason. I wondered if they felt he need to gauge check the new siding ... or play with using third rail back to Reading. There was no second path, so the other unit vanished without trace - I guess its path back to Reading never even got into the VSTP.

In the end, 769943 set off back home on time, despite the maps showing the line as still blocked! It got to Wokingham a bit early, and had to wait for the junction. While it was hardly quiet, it wasn't as loud as 165104 accelerating towards Crowthorne, and nowhere near what else it was waiting for - something yellow running as 354K.
Logged
RichT54
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #147 on: May 30, 2021, 14:15:28 »

I got some photos as it passed between Blackwater and Sandhurst.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K63553/2021-05-30/detailed


Logged
RichT54
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #148 on: June 01, 2021, 10:52:04 »

Interesting comment by the knowledgable "Clarence Yard" on RailUKforums (https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/gwr-class-319-769-information-discussion.174866/post-5159106)

Quote
It is the Wey bridge. Although the units were officially cleared through the bridge, using the usual model against the NR» (Network Rail - home page) database, NR were a little embarrassed to find out that there was a guard rail structure on the bridge that wasn’t on their database. Neither did it conform to current NR standards.

So NR had to do some work on it (it wasn’t in great condition either) and as the clearances from shoe beams to the guard rails were a bit suspect, a physical exercise was thought to be the best way of getting it cleared.

This was the last significant item that remained to be done by the (now disbanded) small NR/GWR (Great Western Railway) DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) task force that has, over the past few years, successfully (and quietly) dealt with all the other GWR 16x and 769 clearance locations.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7425


View Profile
« Reply #149 on: June 02, 2021, 11:22:14 »

The running-in trials are still going on, using the line from Swindon to Maidenhead. Today for the first time I've seen them on RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) "Pathed as Class 769 EMU (Electric Multiple Unit); Planned for 100mph max". Today's paths are a bit of a muddle, some shown as GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about) and some as ZZ, and the single outing "Pathed as Diesel locomotive; Planned for 75mph max" curtailed and replaced by single-leg ones for a 769. But at least they are clocking up the miles.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 20
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page