Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:15 04 Jan 2025
 
* Snow and freezing rain sweep UK with amber warnings in place
- Tributes to 'much loved and popular' boy after quad bike crash
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
4th Jan (1954)
Portishead (New) station opened (link)

Train RunningShort Run
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
21:52 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 04, 2025, 23:22:08 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[266] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[78] Mining in Cornwall
[53] Update on collapsed Bridgewater Canal
[49] GWR Train Crew Weymouth
[48] Outstanding server / web site issues
[44] Old Oak Common Christmas Work
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Halifax - Keighley cycle route through tunnel?  (Read 13587 times)
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 806


View Profile
« on: January 01, 2018, 22:47:16 »


A campaign to use the long-disused Queensbury Tunnel for a cycle route, instead of permanently sealing it.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/01/new-push-to-make-englands-longest-cycle-tunnel-a-reality
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 963


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2018, 16:48:19 »


A campaign to use the long-disused Queensbury Tunnel for a cycle route, instead of permanently sealing it.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/01/new-push-to-make-englands-longest-cycle-tunnel-a-reality

Excellent.

The campaign to get the Two Tunnels path open in Bath went on for at least 10 years, and having finally succeeded, has been a great success in getting people out and about walking, running and cycling. Removing both a huge hill and busy traffic does really open up scope for people to cycle journeys they would never have attempted before (in the case of the Two Tunnels these are mainly leisure journeys along with a few commuters).

There was much concern about having such a long tunnel on a cycle route before it went ahead (I wasn't convinced myself that it would attract people to use it, especially if any incident had occurred just once inside it) but having the integrated music within it has been very successful, and as the article states, the tunnel itself has become a visitor attraction.
Logged
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2100


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2018, 10:33:14 »

There is a petition, if anybody has connections with the area: tiny.cc/queensburytunnel
Logged
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2100


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2018, 10:36:04 »

Looks like the ball could be passed to the Local Authority
https://news.sky.com/story/campaigners-say-deal-close-to-turn-queensbury-railway-line-into-uks-longest-cycle-tunnel-11197070
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1263


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2018, 10:55:07 »

Looks promising, but I hope the importance of getting good connecting routes either side isn't forgotten. One of the reasons the Two Tunnels in Bath work so well is that they link to the river/canal path on one side and the old railway path on the other, so you can do a 12-mile, almost entirely traffic-free circuit. As it stands the Queensbury Tunnel wouldn't really go anywhere, though there are fragments of a railway path here and there. Completing a through route to Halifax, at the very least, ought to be a priority.
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 963


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2018, 18:16:34 »

Looks promising, but I hope the importance of getting good connecting routes either side isn't forgotten. One of the reasons the Two Tunnels in Bath work so well is that they link to the river/canal path on one side and the old railway path on the other, so you can do a 12-mile, almost entirely traffic-free circuit. As it stands the Queensbury Tunnel wouldn't really go anywhere, though there are fragments of a railway path here and there. Completing a through route to Halifax, at the very least, ought to be a priority.

Yes obviously true, but even getting a route out into the countryside is valuable. There are many people in Bath who walk or cycle through the two tunnels just to get to Midford to stop at the pub or walk around there. I don't know the Queensbury area but some of the urban Pennine valleys have some stunning landscape which would be an attraction in itself.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43029



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2018, 21:55:54 »

It seems there is a difference of opinion between the campaigners and Highways England who are the tunnel's custodians - see https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44901081

I can understand the campaigners being enthusiastic and wanting to cast the most positive possible light and budget on the project to reopen the tunnel to cyclists and walkers, and in contrast Highways England wanting to be shot of the darned thing so casting it as negative as possible and looking for a final solution.   I wonder where the balanced truth lies!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5447


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2018, 23:15:20 »

I seem to remember that the safety argument was used by those who opposed the Two Tunnels scheme in Bath...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43029



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2018, 06:45:26 »

I seem to remember that the safety argument was used by those who opposed the Two Tunnels scheme in Bath...

I was surprised and delighted that the Bath scheme was able to overcome all these concerns.   A very useful precedent too - to show it can be done - although local conditions may differ. 
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 590


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2018, 10:05:22 »

If you are looking for other examples the Shute Shelve tunnel in Winscombe on the Strawberry Line is part of the cycleway.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43029



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2018, 15:51:07 »

Came across a video too.



There are many canal tunnels open for general public use in the UK (United Kingdom) too - wonderful experiences all that I have done.   I do look forward to doing Standedge and the full length of Dudley should an opportunity arise.   Others such as Blisworth illustrate the hard work - and in some cases massive expense that's kept them open. No two alike ... I contrast Netherton and Froghall.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43029



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: October 31, 2019, 14:40:33 »

This story has rambled (or cycled!) on ... and although it's not in our part of the UK (United Kingdom), I suspect it has some resonance -  national bodies that come across with a faint whiff of overstepping what they're supposed to be able to do.  Taking measures which, perhaps, are attractive to them as convenient opportunities to put a significant (perhaps project-killing) hurdle in the way or projects which fit into the "not invented by us" category.

From the Telegraph and Argus

Quote
In the latest twist, Bradford Council has announced planning rules may have been breached by the Department for Transport (DfT» (Department for Transport - about)).

A council engineer was sent to the tunnel to make an emergency assessment of its condition.

It follows a recent development when the DfT, which owns the site, began emergency measures to stabilise an air shaft in the face of its “increasingly deteriorating condition” caused by an influx of water.

The work has thrown the reopening of the tunnel into doubt, with Highways England – which looks after the structure on behalf of the DfT – admitting the safety procedures will make it “more challenging” to bring it back into use.

Campaigners are pressing for the 1.4-mile-long tunnel to be reopened to form the centrepiece of a cycle path network connecting Halifax to Bradford and Keighley and have been fighting moves by Highways England to fill in the Victorian structure.

They claim the emergency measures go too far and do not need to be implemented.

Now council leader Councillor Susan Hinchcliffe has asked Secretary of State Grant Shapps to urgently intervene in what the council believes are unauthorised actions.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2019, 14:48:51 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2100


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2019, 07:26:51 »

Maybe we should be more interested in what Highways England do (or don't do) as they took over the duties of the British Rail Residuary Body and responsibility of "former" railway property and structures.

It does seem that somebody somewhere might not be keen on allowing another Two Tunnels Way, which in some ways set the precedent.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43029



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #13 on: May 22, 2024, 06:15:05 »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cpvv9zq4nywo

Quote
Campaigners calling for a disused railway tunnel to be brought back into use say its reopening would be a way of honouring those who built it 150 years ago.

Work to construct the Queensbury Tunnel, which links Bradford and Halifax in West Yorkshire, began on 21 May 1874.

Norah McWilliam, of the Queensbury Tunnel Society, said it was now "time to end the uncertainty" over its future.

The society wants the 1.4-mile (2.25km) route to become a traffic-free "greenway" for walkers and cyclists.

The railway line closed in 1956, with the tunnel owned by the Department for Transport.

It is maintained on its behalf by National Highways' Historical Railways Estate, which has been approached for comment.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2100


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 22, 2024, 06:53:02 »

I am never sure whether it is better not to rattle National Highways' Historical Railways Estate's cage, as their normal response is to either fill it with concrete or demolish it (depending on the type of structure).
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page