phile
|
|
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2017, 21:30:33 » |
|
Bith the last two Oxford/Banbury shuttles this evening have been cancelled! That's 25% of services today. Oh, we list the first one today to a failed train too. So that's actually 37.5% gone today
I'll happily help you draft a letter to Mr Hopwood. Could throw in services on the Cardiff to Portsmouth Hbr/Brighton on Sundays as well for good measure
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #31 on: September 21, 2017, 21:57:31 » |
|
I'll get a better response by going to the relevant Director
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Worcester_Passenger
|
|
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2017, 07:54:14 » |
|
06:42 Hereford - Paddington cancelled between Hereford and Worcester Shrub Hill this morning. Fortunately I'd arrived at Foregate St in sufficient time to catch the preceding London Midland train round to Shrub Hill. According to realtimetrains, This service was cancelled between Hereford and Worcester Shrub Hill due to an issue with the train crew (TG). According to journeycheck, This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time. Which should I believe?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #33 on: September 22, 2017, 07:59:13 » |
|
Was there fog in your area? That might have delayed the crews taxi up to HFD» , meaning they went to WOS» ?
Does Realtimetrains show an ECS▸ move from HFD at usual time, or did the stock go direct to WOS?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2017, 09:34:19 » |
|
Apart from the Hereford/Worcesters mentioned above, things seem to be much improved this morning with no cancellations due to train crew shortages.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Worcester_Passenger
|
|
« Reply #35 on: September 22, 2017, 11:41:53 » |
|
According to realtimetrains, the 06:42 from Hereford is formed by an empty stock movement from St Philip's Marsh at 04:30, arrive Hereford 06:29. This didn't operate "due to an issue with the train crew".
Judging from the shuffling of stock that I could see at Shrub Hill, the HST▸ that normally sleeps there so as to form the 07:08 departure to Paddington via Cheltenham (and its crew) were used for the 07:32 departure to Paddington via Oxford. The HST was in reverse formation, which is what I'd expect if it was supposed to operate via Gloucester.
The 07:08 via Cheltenham is being shown in realtimetrains as having been cancelled between Shrub Hill and Cheltenham, but operating normally beyond. There's an empty stock movement from St Philip's Marsh (depart 05:10) associated with this.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BBM
|
|
« Reply #36 on: September 22, 2017, 12:07:52 » |
|
On Thursday evening of last week I was up in London for a show. The most convenient train for me back to Twyford would have been the 2318 PAD» -OXF» semi-fast but I checked RTT» and discovered it was being regularly cancelled "due to an issue with the train crew". Instead I drove and parked in Westfield and used the Tube from there. I've just taken a look at RTT and so far that train's been cancelled every night this week.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #37 on: September 22, 2017, 12:31:00 » |
|
Yes, the 23:18 is often sacrificed as the driver and train work empty from Oxford at around 9pm, so a driver and carriages can be used for other duties for over three and a half hours with the cancellation of just that one train. Also, there's the 23:30 fast to Reading which Reading passengers can use. I think, at that time of night, stops on that 23:30 should be inserted at Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford given the generous running times at that time of night, but I've not observed that to be the case.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
phile
|
|
« Reply #38 on: September 22, 2017, 15:19:26 » |
|
Just one for today so far o the LTV▸ - Maidenhead this evening
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NickB
|
|
« Reply #39 on: September 22, 2017, 17:49:49 » |
|
On Thursday evening of last week I was up in London for a show. The most convenient train for me back to Twyford would have been the 2318 PAD» -OXF» semi-fast but I checked RTT» and discovered it was being regularly cancelled "due to an issue with the train crew". Instead I drove and parked in Westfield and used the Tube from there. I've just taken a look at RTT and so far that train's been cancelled every night this week.
The 23.18 is quite a vital post-pub train, and is regularly very busy. All I can say is that GwR had better get this mess sorted by the time that Christmas party season starts or they will be needing some extra BTP▸ at Paddington to deal with very frustrated and lively passengers. Ps. 17.36 to Oxford, rammed in its normal 5 carriage form, is a pleasant 2 carriage squash-fest today - and left passengers on the platform.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sixty3Closure
|
|
« Reply #40 on: September 22, 2017, 18:04:29 » |
|
The 17.36 is meant to be a 8 car HST▸ . Replacing it with a 5 car turbo would be just about manageable as that's what it use to be. Some people standing but generally folks could get on. The 2 cars though is just a joke and becoming all to frequent.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Adelante_CCT
|
|
« Reply #41 on: September 22, 2017, 18:37:59 » |
|
No, the 17:36 is diagrammed as a turbo (and has been since 4th September) therefore I'm assuming 5 car as NickB said
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Worcester_Passenger
|
|
« Reply #42 on: September 22, 2017, 19:11:19 » |
|
18:22 Paddington - Hereford cancelled this evening between Shrub Hill and Hereford "due to a shortage of train crew"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sixty3Closure
|
|
« Reply #43 on: September 22, 2017, 19:45:41 » |
|
No, the 17:36 is diagrammed as a turbo (and has been since 4th September) therefore I'm assuming 5 car as NickB said
Pretty sure its been a HST▸ last couple of times I've caught it although I've generally been taking advantage of the 17.18 stopping at Twyford again. If it is going to be a 5 car turbo again (in theory) that's a bit of a disappointment.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NickB
|
|
« Reply #44 on: September 22, 2017, 23:20:00 » |
|
The 17.36 certianly used to be an 8 car HST▸ and needed to be as such. It toyed with being an adelante when an HST was removed for a few weeeks last summer. The 5 car turbo is poor and the 2 car is criminal.
This simply shifts more passengers for maidenhead to the next direct service which is the perennially overcrowded 18.18 which is a turbo itself and is the worst train of the schedule.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|