John R
|
|
« on: September 08, 2017, 00:22:46 » |
|
I noticed at Paddington this evening a notice advising that the earliest departure for off peak tickets has been pushed back 45 mins from 0815 to 0900.
This seems a significant variation. Are there no restrictions on TOCS as to when off peak fares are valid, so that over time they can continue to be reduced?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2017, 09:59:04 » |
|
Yes there is - I know that off-peak have to be valid weekdays after 1901 for example. I guess there is an AM limit too, but I don't know what it is. Arrivals before 1000 into LOndon for sure are peak, going out, I don't know, but 0900 would be within the limit, I suspect. So it's a commercial decision.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2017, 10:53:40 » |
|
Looking at one flow, Swindon - London Terminals, Off Peak Return, with restriction code LC▸ . It appears GWR▸ have made this change to ticket issuing systems, but not bothered to tell National Rail Enquiries ( NRE‡) or ensure they update their information (as of 8th September 2017). NRE is the definitive source for ticket information. Tickets show the specific restriction code. Therefore the validity is as shown on NRE. Regardless of how many posters GWR may put up. http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_fares/ticket_types/64148.aspxThen there's GWR's 'Guide to Travelling With Us' available from stations (I've just picked one up from Taunton). That tells intending passengers that Off Peak tickets are valid from Paddington after 0810.
|
|
« Last Edit: September 08, 2017, 11:10:28 by bignosemac »
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2017, 10:57:00 » |
|
Another fare increase by stealth
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2017, 11:07:03 » |
|
And?.....
Every company does it. Don't hear complaints other than rail.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2017, 11:14:20 » |
|
I despair sometimes at your defence of the indefensible, ChrisB. Just because it's done, doesn't mean it should be. I'd be mightily pissed off if I brought this to the attention of the Customer Panel and got the response you've just given.
|
|
« Last Edit: September 08, 2017, 11:49:04 by bignosemac »
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2017, 11:25:21 » |
|
I can't easily find anything in the franchise agreement that restricts GWR▸ 's ability to change the classification of trains from off peak to peak.
So for Bristol passengers that's a 117% increase from £46.90 to £102. Reasonable cause for complaint in my opinion, even if ChrisB doesn't agree.
Curiously the 0830 from BRI» to PAD» is off peak, but in the opposite direction is peak, even though intuitively the greater flow will be towards London. So how long before that gets restricted too?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2017, 11:27:40 » |
|
And?.....
Every company does it. Don't hear complaints other than rail.
Really? Ever heard of 'shrinkflation' where companies make their products smaller but charge the same price? I'm sure if you went to consumer based forums there would be plenty ranting about that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Richard Fairhurst
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2017, 12:02:06 » |
|
Are there any details online about this? What flows/restrictions it affects - are we just talking "out of Paddington", or across the GWR▸ network in general? (As it happens, the GWR website appears to be unreachable right now...)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2017, 12:13:58 » |
|
I'd be shocked if GWR▸ bothered to put any information about the massive price hike by stealth online.
Previous form tells us that they think a poster or two, after the fact, is sufficient.
I doubt the posters even bother to say that tickets purchased before the price hike are still valid after 0810.
Not that that changes current validity until the definitive source, National Rail Enquiries, is updated.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2017, 12:20:47 » |
|
Well hopefully this topic started by John R will prompt anyone at GWR▸ who reads posts on this forum to ensure it's made more well known so their passengers don't get caught out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2017, 13:12:34 » |
|
It was the 'by stealth' I wasn't exactly defending, but referring to.
All sorts of companies do it, and very few get called on it. Toblerone I thonk was the last one? But washing powder/liquid has recently seen boxes/bottles shrink & I've yet to see any comment anywhere.
I agree with BNM about tickets purchased in advance of the change. They must remain valid. I'm not sure many though would have the courage to fight the non-mention on NRE‡'s website of a change to a validity code. Frankly, they ought to set up a new code for new sales, then there could be no arguments. But how many even know that NRE's website is the arbiter of validities? (Mind you, where does it say this, BNM?)
This presumably came in at the September fares change point? (which would have been Sunday 3rd?)
However. If tickets purchased prior to the rise date are still valid, how other than posters do they announce the rise? Any shop would simply change the price tag. Online, this will have happened with the fares no longer available being not shown since the rise and the new price is displayed. Ditto on TVMs▸ . Presumably the same at ticket offices.
Similarly, no shop/airline gives advance notice of rises, prices simply change. So why do we expect rail to be different? Serious Q.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2017, 13:20:03 » |
|
Definitive: http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/46383.aspxA change in the validity of a train ticket is a very different beast to price rises or shrinkflation (plenty of news and social media coverage) in shops.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2017, 13:34:56 » |
|
It was the 'by stealth' I wasn't exactly defending, but referring to.
All sorts of companies do it, and very few get called on it. Toblerone I thonk was the last one? But washing powder/liquid has recently seen boxes/bottles shrink & I've yet to see any comment anywhere.
I agree with BNM about tickets purchased in advance of the change. They must remain valid. I'm not sure many though would have the courage to fight the non-mention on NRE‡'s website of a change to a validity code. Frankly, they ought to set up a new code for new sales, then there could be no arguments. But how many even know that NRE's website is the arbiter of validities? (Mind you, where does it say this, BNM?)
This presumably came in at the September fares change point? (which would have been Sunday 3rd?)
However. If tickets purchased prior to the rise date are still valid, how other than posters do they announce the rise? Any shop would simply change the price tag. Online, this will have happened with the fares no longer available being not shown since the rise and the new price is displayed. Ditto on TVMs▸ . Presumably the same at ticket offices.
Similarly, no shop/airline gives advance notice of rises, prices simply change. So why do we expect rail to be different? Serious Q.
There's actually been quite a lot of discussion about shrinkflation in the media. As to the last question, with shops and airlines you usually have a choice as to where you take your custom, and indeed in most cases whether you even have to make the purchase/journey. With rail you very rarely have a choice of supplier, and the railways are a public service, albeit in part privatised. So it does command a bit of a monopoly, and thus I believe is in a different position.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2017, 13:45:29 » |
|
Looking at the full restriction code LC▸ text on BRFares (dated 3 September 2017) it says: OUTWARD TRAVEL
Not valid for travel on trains timed to depart after 04:29 and before the times shown from the following stations: but the following long list of stations does not include Paddington. RETURN TRAVEL
Not valid on trains timed to depart: London Paddington after 04:29 and before 08:10 and after 16:40 until 18:31 Reading after 04:29 and before 08:35 and after 17:10 until 19:01 Slough after 04:29 and before 07:50 London Waterloo after 04:29 and before 08:15 Not valid on trains timed to arrive Salisbury after 04:29 and before 09:30 and that's all; note no catch-all restriction. Down at the bottom, in the "unpublished restrictions" it says: Outward Journey From Until Restriction(s) below apply on these days only: Mon 4 Sep 2017 Sun 17 Dec 2017 Mo Tu We Th Fr Not valid to depart DIDCOT PARKWAY 0001–0929 on any TOC▸ Not valid to depart LONDON PADDINGTON 0430–0848 on any TOC Not valid to depart SWINDON (WILTS) 0546–0904 on any TOC
Return Journey Mon 4 Sep 2017 Sun 17 Dec 2017 Mo Tu We Th Fr Not valid to depart LONDON PADDINGTON 1641–1830 on any TOC Those are the only items I can see for travel from Paddington applying today, among many for other cases. Make of that what you will. AFAICS▸ , the only train leaving PAD» for SWI» after 08:10 and not after 09:00 is the 08:30 to Bristol, for which Journey Planner does indeed not off offer an SVR to Swindon.
|
|
« Last Edit: September 08, 2017, 13:50:34 by stuving »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|