Western Pathfinder
|
|
« Reply #525 on: November 18, 2018, 16:02:47 » |
|
Thanks for posting that. Interesting. In my days on the WCML▸ in the Late 1960/Early 1970s, the MK1 OLE▸ wasn't that slack and I certainly don't remember that much uplift. I speak from a position of authority on that as I used to be hanging in a signal cage between tracks and having pantographs passing me at about 2.5m away at 100mph My pleasure S&T▸ thought you might find it interesting.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #526 on: November 18, 2018, 16:24:03 » |
|
I speak from a position of authority on that as I used to be hanging in a signal cage between tracks and having pantographs passing me at about 2.5m away at 100mph
I do not think that H&S▸ would allow that today. I think they do. I’m fairly sure they are still being installed, are there not a few in the Reading station area? Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #527 on: November 18, 2018, 16:53:41 » |
|
Thanks for posting that. Interesting. In my days on the WCML▸ in the Late 1960/Early 1970s, the MK1 OLE▸ wasn't that slack and I certainly don't remember that much uplift. I speak from a position of authority on that as I used to be hanging in a signal cage between tracks and having pantographs passing me at about 2.5m away at 100mph The Mk 1 may have been fixed tension in those days, very little give which surprisingly enough meant lower line speed. The up lift of series 1 & 2 I doubt is more than Mk 3. I speak from a position of authority on that as I used to be hanging in a signal cage between tracks and having pantographs passing me at about 2.5m away at 100mph
I do not think that H&S▸ would allow that today. I think they do. Im fairly sure they are still being installed, are there not a few in the Reading station area? Paul Cages for signal maintenance are an option of last resort now, especially with LED signal heads, preferred methods are either from a MEWP▸ (Mobile Elevated Working Platform) aka a cherry picker or on winch / tilt over mast.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #528 on: November 18, 2018, 16:56:31 » |
|
Thanks for posting that. Interesting. In my days on the WCML▸ in the Late 1960/Early 1970s, the MK1 OLE▸ wasn't that slack and I certainly don't remember that much uplift. I speak from a position of authority on that as I used to be hanging in a signal cage between tracks and having pantographs passing me at about 2.5m away at 100mph For Series 1, the design pantograph uplift is 80 mm, with a maximum of 200 mm allowed for before bits hit each other. The allowed circumflex in a single-span overlap (which AIUI▸ is the static rise in the two contact wire heights where they are equal) is 10-70 mm. The picture doesn't look much different from those figures allowing for the foreshortening that exaggerates the bounce and floppiness of all the wires.
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2018, 18:38:30 by stuving »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SandTEngineer
|
|
« Reply #529 on: November 18, 2018, 17:37:53 » |
|
Thanks for that STUVING. Maybe its just that the video was taken with a slightly phototelescopic lens? By the way, did you mean 200mm and not 200m?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #530 on: November 18, 2018, 18:37:55 » |
|
Thanks for that STUVING. Maybe its just that the video was taken with a slightly phototelescopic lens? By the way, did you mean 200mm and not 200m?
Yes, of course, thanks. You know the perspective is misleading because the supports and registration arms look so close to each other, on plain line where you know they aren't. It's even quite hard to see which bits are attached to which portal. There are lots of Knightons, this must be the one between Uffington and Shrivenham - though the crossing was closed several years ago, and was named for nothing more than a copse.
|
|
« Last Edit: November 18, 2018, 18:56:06 by stuving »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DidcotPunter
|
|
« Reply #531 on: November 18, 2018, 20:00:20 » |
|
Hmm. It was clearly taken with a telephoto lens though the uplift from the pantograph looked pretty normal to me. Knighton is a bit more than a copse, it's a hamlet/village about a mile south of the site of the crossing. https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5834848,-1.5930662,3a,75y,180h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sh4p0dvfEfXIXEJv-p1TSYA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Here's the site of Knighton Crossing (before electrification), it's on the road between Knighton village and Longcot. https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5992317,-1.6024652,3a,75y,319.26h,86.35t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYYEmXfoIekHu-ZQ1G8oxGg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 It was replaced by this underbridge on Claypit Lane between Uffington and Longcot which the Knighton road was diverted into.Might have been at the time HSTs▸ were introduced in 1976 or even earlier? https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5997639,-1.6008706,3a,75y,342.34h,101.29t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1symZBAt4wGsQSgTExObcU8A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #532 on: November 18, 2018, 20:15:28 » |
|
Knighton is a bit more than a copse, it's a hamlet/village about a mile south of the site of the crossing.
Fair enough - I apologise to all Knightonians about that. Mapmakers have decided that Compton Beauchamp is a more important place, for some reason.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #533 on: November 18, 2018, 22:58:23 » |
|
I can confirm that Knighton is a hamlet within the parish of Compton Beauchamp and although not large is a quite a high proportion of the parish as a whole.
I can also confirm that Knighton crossing was closed as part of the High Speed Train (HST▸ ) works in the 1970's. In fact Claypit lane was diverted with a new bridge constructed under the railway. The current connecting road from the road from Knighton was actually the original connection to allow Claypits lane to cross the railway at Knighton Crossing.
Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
|
|
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 16:55:28 by VickiS »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Oxonhutch
|
|
« Reply #534 on: November 19, 2018, 05:52:05 » |
|
Adrian Vaughan "Signalman's Reflections" has a section on working Knighton Crossing as a school boy in the 1950s, and the role it played in regulation traffic to and from Chippenham. He also relates how the signalman of the day got its status, and hence his pay, raised by having the locals (Knightonians perhaps) use the crossing a lot more on assessment day.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Drkpm
|
|
« Reply #535 on: November 22, 2018, 14:00:55 » |
|
PAD» /SWA» .. 1B25, Departed Swindon this morning with its “Pan still up”...Slowed to a near stop, before the Pan was dropped and the diesels started......How much are these “ Professionals “ paid ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #536 on: November 22, 2018, 14:39:52 » |
|
PAD» /SWA» .. 1B25, Departed Swindon this morning with its “Pan still up”...Slowed to a near stop, before the Pan was dropped and the diesels started......How much are these “ Professionals “ paid ?
Welcome to the forum, Drkpm ... I'm guessing that's a rhetorical question about salary levels? Is that the first report of a passenger carrying train leaving Swindon westbound under electric traction - perhaps part of testing / training, and intentionally done?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Rooke
Newbie
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #537 on: November 22, 2018, 22:29:42 » |
|
Travelled on 1615hrs Pad/Swansea 9 car set yesterday under the pan until BPW» then diesel.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #538 on: November 23, 2018, 10:16:22 » |
|
Travelled on 1615hrs Pad/Swansea 9 car set yesterday under the pan until BPW» then diesel.
What about Steventon bridge just after Didcot? Big article in Dec Modern Railways showing signage for drivers regarding dropping the pan and gong diesel to traverse the bridge. Not sure I fully understand the procedure.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #539 on: November 23, 2018, 10:38:15 » |
|
Big article in Dec Modern Railways showing signage for drivers regarding dropping the pan and gong diesel to traverse the bridge. Not sure I fully understand the procedure.
Basically the driver selects diesel mode at Moreton cutting, runs on diesel through Didcot and as far as Causeway and at a section of Over-Head Line Equipment (OHLE) that has been specially tensioned, indicated by lineside signage, at Causeway they select electric mode to raise the pan and continue on electric to Swindon where diesel mode is once again currently selected. Signage consists of an advance warning, a raise pan sign and a 'too late, don't raise pan sign!' at the end of the section. If you leave it too late you can't change over to electric unless doing less than 20mph. There are no in cab indications, though eventually the APCo (Automatic Power Changeover) system should be commissioned which does the changeover automatically. Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronym
|
|
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 16:56:31 by VickiS »
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
|