I felt that the 1500 pound figure sounded a bit high - certainly with regard to the trains that I have costed out over the last three years, so I went back to some figures and sources. I came up with a theoretical figure of around 950 pounds per day for each carriage of a 150, and I would guess that 143 carriages are a little less and 158s a little more.
The 1500 figure might be about right for a high speed carriage, especially if you factor in the power cars - but then such a carriage is going to travel twice the number of miles in the average minute, so it can make twice the income even if pence per mile were equal - a whole different ballgame to the
MTLS▸ one which is not looking at
HSTs▸ .
Three more interesting inputs to this discussion:
1. The effect of moving a single carriage from one route to another, where it runs a higher daily mileage, can be a long way over 250 pounds per day. I have the background to this commercial figure but I don't think I ought publish the maths or be move specific. So if you take a carriage off
completely on a "quiet" day it may not be quite so silly from a financial viewpoint - it may save nearly the same amount of money in operating costs as the hire costs.
2. Operating 2 to 4 coach trains that are averaging under 50 m.p.h. including stops, with a fare of between .20 and .30p per mile top whack and many cheaper fares isn't going to make money. Add this to the previous point and it starts looking like there may be cases that it's better to leave carriages in sidings or ...
3. Trains need servicing. If there's more demand in some parts of the week than others, does it make economic sense to keep your service depot running for as long as possible - i.e. as perceived in the franchise, to have a maximum of trains in service on Monday to Friday peak hours only.
I'm not taking "sides" here - just adding some background comments to point out that there are perhaps some figures and comments that are a bit over the top all around. My own philosophy is to work within the system, look to make practical suggestions rather than looking for a change of the system or using a publicity seeking approach. But then I have to note that since I got involved in the campaign for an appropriate TransWilts service, we have LOST two thirds of the trains, whereas since MTLS started up after the December 2006 cuts, there have been huge gains on their Bristol Commuter lines. Makes you think, doens't it?