Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 27 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
08:44 London Paddington to Great Malvern
08:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
09:15 Bristol Temple Meads to Weston-Super-Mare
10:05 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
10:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
12:30 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
13:11 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
13:30 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
14:00 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
14:35 Severn Beach to Weston-Super-Mare
14:40 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
15:41 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
15:44 Swindon to Frome
18:11 Castle Cary to Swindon
19:35 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
19:43 Swindon to Westbury
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
21:28 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
22:06 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
22:35 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
08:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
10:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
10:54 Exmouth to Paignton
10:55 Cardiff Central to Penzance
11:35 Severn Beach to Weston-Super-Mare
12:00 Cardiff Central to Exeter St Davids
12:53 Paignton to Exmouth
13:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
14:07 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:22 Frome to Swindon
14:50 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
15:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
16:08 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
16:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:36 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:43 Frome to Swindon
16:48 Bristol Temple Meads to Castle Cary
17:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
17:32 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
17:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
19:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Westbury
23:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
09:05 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:25 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
09:55 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2025, 09:45:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[99] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[88] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[80] Standardisation of Time and the Railway Clearing House
[56] Taplow-Hassocks
[49] Solar panels between the rails in Switzerland
[44] Intoxicated person plan needed on Tube - coroner, April 2025
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Fuel cell alternatives to diesel engines.  (Read 4560 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43912



View Profile WWW Email
« on: March 18, 2017, 05:26:13 »

In the past, I have walked past lines of taxis without too much note ... but in St Albans this last week I couldn't help noticing a line of 8, all with their engines running, waiting to be hired in the town centre. A a faint odour that was probably doing me not good what so ever. Big lines of taxis waiting at the station and rush hour jams all over the place - thank goodness I live aways from this. It has me wondering just how much difference diesel trains versus other transport modes really make.



News, however, of several different hydrogen fuel cell proposals and experiments.   Could these be somethng we'll see in practical use on the railways in the next few years?

http://www.railway-technology.com/news/newsfuel-cell-systems-study-demonstrates-fuel-cell-technology-use-to-power-trains-in-uk-5763984

Quote
Fuel Cell Systems has demonstrated the feasibility of using hydrogen cells to power trains in a study conducted for the UK (United Kingdom) rail industry.

Performed in collaboration with the University of Birmingham and Hitachi Rail Europe, the six-month study indicated that hydrogen fuel cell technology can be retrofitted to increase the life of current rolling stock.

The study also showed that fuel cells are a clean alternative for the self-powered regional trains in the country.

Funded by Rail Safety and Standards Board ( RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board)) and Network Rail, the project established that using the technology could cut journey times, reduce emissions at the point of use and improve passenger comfort.

To examine the real-life applications, the study included mathematical modelling on known rail routes such as the Norwich to Sheringham.

Fuel Cell Systems managing director Tom Sperrey said: "Compared to traditional engines, fuel cell vehicles are cleaner, emitting no exhaust fumes, just a small quantity of pure water. They are going to be a major contributor in combatting atmospheric pollution.”

It is expected that the hydrogen fuel cell powered trains would complement the future electrification of the railway network, eliminate the interruption in services caused by installation of overhead wires, or modifications to bridges and tunnels during full electrification.

While the technology has already been tested in Japan in 2006, China has introduced a fully operational hydrogen-powered tram in Qingdao in 2015, and Germany is planning to electrify the 1,100km railway network in the Schleswig-Holstein region by 2025

https://www.theengineer.co.uk/alstom-tests-first-fuel-cell-powered-passenger-train/

Quote
Alstom has run the first tests of its Coradia iLint passenger train, claimed to be the first in the world to be run on electricity from a hydrogen fuel cell. The test, which took place at the company’s test track in Lower Saxony, Germany, saw the train running at 80km/h.

The test was the beginning of four weeks of trials of the iLint, which will check the stability of the energy supply system and the interface between pneumatic and electric brakes. Alstom claims that the train uses a combination of innovative technologies, such as clean energy conversion, flexible battery storage, and smart management of traction power and available electricity. While for its tests the train is running on hydrogen produced as a byproduct of industrial processes, Alstom envisages train services running on hydrogen produced by wind power.

Tests are also underway in Velim, Czech Republic, during which the train will run at its full-service speed of 140km/h. Static trials have already been completed, during which Alstom verified all the electrical and pneumatic functions, including the pressure tank that holds the hydrogen fuel, the battery and the fuel cell itself. Based on the company’s diesel train, the Coradia iLint is being targeted at non-electrified rail routes.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 999


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2017, 07:55:46 »

In the past, I have walked past lines of taxis without too much note ... but in St Albans this last week I couldn't help noticing a line of 8, all with their engines running, waiting to be hired in the town centre. A a faint odour that was probably doing me not good what so ever. Big lines of taxis waiting at the station and rush hour jams all over the place - thank goodness I live aways from this. It has me wondering just how much difference diesel trains versus other transport modes really make.

I like the sketch Graham.

Many places now have 'switch'off' campaigns that encourage motorists stopped in queues to switch off their engines. Looks like St Albans needs one of these.

I have no knowledge of fuel cells but will watch with interest in how these experiments progress.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2017, 08:13:49 »

The concern I have about fuel cells is the fuel storage in the event of an accident. Hydrogen if it mixes with oxygen is highly explosive, and being a gas is much more likely to mix!  I recall reading about accidents in the days of gas lights on trains.
Logged
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 655


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2017, 10:52:49 »

Been to Amsterdam recently? Lots of Teslas in use as taxis...
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7426


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2017, 11:32:02 »

Quite by coincidence, I came upon this snippet (from railway-technology.com):
Quote
CRRC subsidiary Qingdao Sifang has secured a contract to deliver eight hydrogen-powered tramcars.

Designed for a maximum speed of 70km/h, the trams can each carry 285 passengers. The trams will operate on the 17.4km Gaoming Line in Guangdong province, China, which will open for public use in 2018.
That doesn't say "fuel cell", but this (from Ballard Power Systems) explains that they are:
Quote
Dr. Kevin Colbow, Ballard Vice President – Technology and Product Development said, “We have worked very closely with CSR (Cab Secure Radio) Sifang over the past 18-months on the development of a 200 kilowatt fuel cell solution for light rail applications. We expect our collaboration with CSR Sifang will lead to the world’s first commercial deployment of a fuel cell-powered tram line, which should open opportunities globally.”

Each of the fuel cell trams on the Gaoming Line will have a capacity of 285 passengers and a maximum speed of 70 km/hour. The Gaoming Line will be 17.4 kilometers long, with 20 stops. In addition to delivering strong operating performance, the fuel cell trams will have a longer range and be more environmentally-friendly than traditional trams.
Logged
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 597


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2017, 11:59:23 »

In the future, rail transport has two serious options, electric trains via overhead cables, or electric trains via either hydrogen or methane fuel cells.

Whilst I find the ideas of fuel cells appealing for cars/vans/buses the scale of storage required for a train is probably non viable. Just imagine each train pulling a steel large cylinder, or embedding multiple cylinders with gas tubing along a train. A recipe for disaster.

What I find depressing about Network Rail/DfT» (Department for Transport - about) is the lack of long term planning. Why should this country not have a 25 year plan to electrify ALL track by overhead, or third rail if needed. At least Network Rail would be able to purchase the right equipment, and training, knowing the scale of work to deploy, maintain and upgrade a fully electric rail network.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5676



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2017, 13:36:23 »

I doubt that we will see fuel cell powered trains in the foreseeable future.
Fuel cells of sufficient capacity to power a train are hugely expensive and very bulky, hydrogen fuel is expensive and costly to store and handle.

The future IMHO ('in my humble opinion') is largely electric. For those parts of the network that cant be readily electrified, then the near term future is bi-mode* electric/diesel* units as are presently being built.

The longer term future, perhaps when the IETs (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) are obsolete, is battery power for bits that cant realistically be electrified.

*I have previously been very critical of the new IETs, but that is due largely to the downgraded fit out such as no buffet, and should not be taken as a criticism of the principle of bi-mode operation.
Likewise I feel that underfloor engines are a backward step for long distance, high speed operation. Use of the underfloor engine for a few miles of a 200 mile journey would be more acceptable.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43912



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2017, 11:24:41 »

From BT's technology feed

Quote
World's first zero-emissions train that only emits steam completes its first test run

Good to hear about the first run.  A bit overplayed, though - aren't electric trains zero-emission already?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2017, 12:25:44 »

Only if the electricity is generated by non-carbon emitting means.
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2017, 10:20:06 »

Only if the electricity is generated by non-carbon emitting means.
Which equally applies to the electricity used to get the hydrogen for a fuel-cell vehicle (or has the research centre near Port Talbot got the bacteria working?)
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5502


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2017, 17:43:48 »

One of the downsides of fuel cells - at least in cars - is that the hydrogen needs to be stored at 8000psi to make it practical. Notwithstanding the dodginess of this, is makes the handling rather expensive.

As a thought, though: what are the practical problems of connecting fuel cells or batteries to existing traction motors, replacing the existing diesel engine and generator sets?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5676



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2017, 17:52:15 »


As a thought, though: what are the practical problems of connecting fuel cells or batteries to existing traction motors, replacing the existing diesel engine and generator sets?


Batteries, certainly, it has been done already for test or trial purposes.

Fuel cells are slightly more problematic since they do not react well to sudden load changes and would therefore need a battery as well. And of course the problems of hydrogen storage remain.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page