grahame
|
|
« Reply #90 on: November 17, 2017, 15:45:49 » |
|
Rumours on Twitter that the Devon and Cornwall TOC▸ will include the Berks and Hants route to London Philip Haigh yesterday on Twitter Hearing whisper that proposed Devon & Cornwall TOC will include Berks & Hants route to London. DfT» to consult very soon. That has potential to introduce some competition (price and journey time) for those in Wiltshire who need to get to London and can chose between going North to Bath/Chippenham or South to Westbury. There is already a "via Salisbury" option ... a "via Newbury" and an "any permitted" ... a total of 12 standard class return fares from Westbury to London terminals are listed at BR▸ Fares . Of course, at certain times you may do better splitting at Newbury ...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
devonexpress
|
|
« Reply #91 on: November 18, 2017, 19:57:42 » |
|
Rumours on Twitter that the Devon and Cornwall TOC▸ will include the Berks and Hants route to London Philip Haigh yesterday on Twitter Hearing whisper that proposed Devon & Cornwall TOC will include Berks & Hants route to London. DfT» to consult very soon. haha there is also "rumors" that the London-South Wales route will become its own franchise, or that Bristol to Portsmouth sections will become part of the South Western Railway! Its all a load of speculative rubbish! At the moment its only an idea that's been hanging around for 2 years, and what's happened in that time? Nothing! Its just Chris Grayling trying to look like a busy body who's improving rail franchises, he's an idiot who doesn't even understand railways, how can he when he hardly ever commutes on them, and takes his ministerial car to Westminster everyday!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
a-driver
|
|
« Reply #92 on: November 28, 2017, 22:28:22 » |
|
An announcement on a potential Devon & Cornwall franchise will be made tomorrow. Absolute madness if it goes ahead. Not much support from the local MPs▸
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Henry
|
|
« Reply #93 on: November 29, 2017, 08:11:17 » |
|
Has the process started already ?, Crossrail taking some of the London GWR▸ stations.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #94 on: November 29, 2017, 08:27:36 » |
|
The way it was being talked about on the Today program this morning was Intercity and locals being split up sounding like it was something revolutionary making franchises smaller. Anyway, we shall see later when it's all announced.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #95 on: November 29, 2017, 08:33:39 » |
|
Looking at the map of the split in the consultation document:
There would be no through trains WSM to London There would be no services to Devon routed via Swindon and Bristol
The only through SW services from Bristol would be run by the Cross Country
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #96 on: November 29, 2017, 09:07:52 » |
|
And only as far as Exeter if XCs▸ proposals aren't changed!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devonexpress
|
|
« Reply #97 on: November 30, 2017, 00:36:33 » |
|
Isn't that all ready happening because of the IET▸ introduction, absolutely stupid if you ask me. If you remember though back in 2014 George Osbourne said he wanted to split the Devon & Cornwall locals from the rest of the franchise, because the idiot MP▸ 's where moaning. Then a lot of people said "no" so the MP's said "no" and now that's been scrapped in favour of merging the locals and intercity services into a franchise, and everyone saying "no" again. I wonder how many proposal and how much money is being spent on all of this, until the penny finally drops. Its just a waste of civil servants time, and causing more problems than answers.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Noggin
|
|
« Reply #98 on: November 30, 2017, 14:09:58 » |
|
This is the map out of the consultation. So roughly speaking, one lot gets the GWML▸ to Swansea plus the Reading diesel work, the other lot gets the Berks & Hants to Penzance plus Bristol and Exeter diesel work. In some respect there's the "if it aint broke, why fix it" argument. But on the other hand, the franchise is a big one, management attention will inevitably be focused on London to Cardiff and the LTV▸ lines, so perhaps splitting it with an entity that has time and energy to deal with regional government such as the WoE, Devon & Cornwall etc might not be a bad thing. Also, it addresses some of the original issues with Wessex in that they didn't have an Intercity cash-cow, so were permanently the poor relation and were heavily reliant on subsidies. Whilst it sort of follows the split on the original IET▸ order and the 802's for Penzance, IIRC▸ it's not entirely the case and there are some 802's intended for Oxford services. As for no services from London to WoE via Bristol, I believe that it was always the plan with the IEP▸ 's. Of course, don't forget that this is just a consultation, there's likely scope for movement if user groups kick up enough of a stink.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rogerw
|
|
« Reply #99 on: November 30, 2017, 19:18:50 » |
|
One of my concerns is over fares from the west Wilts area, particularly towards London. At present there are 3 possible routes towards Reading and Paddington, via Bath, via Melksham and via Newbury, all offering advance fares. If teh service from Bath/Chippenham is under a different franchise will we be left with advance fares via Westbury only, one train every 2 hours as against the, at least, half hourly offering at present. Advance fares via Salisbury, when available, are generally limited to the through services and no longer offered on connecting services as once was then case.
|
|
|
Logged
|
I like to travel. It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
|
|
|
devonexpress
|
|
« Reply #100 on: November 30, 2017, 21:18:17 » |
|
Having just answered the consolation questionnaire and given some very strong feedback to the department for transport, I can also reveal they have plans to transfer the Greenford Branch to Chiltern Railways(heaven knows why its always been a Western railway route) and the Bristol - Salisbury - Southampton - Brighton route is to be split up, with the new GW▸ franchise to serve Bristol to Salisbury - Southampton, and Southampton to Brighton being taken over my TSGN and run by 377's. Which is actually not a bad idea as it allows GWR▸ to utilise more 158's elsewhere Or 166's if they ever get approved. Overall the only benefit of splitting it up is more money to the government(which is really all they care about). Oh and one final confirmation for everyone, the GWR franchise may be extended by another 2 years until 2022.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #101 on: November 30, 2017, 21:44:47 » |
|
I can also reveal they have plans to transfer the Greenford Branch to Chiltern Railways(heaven knows why its always been a Western railway route) I can for pure rolling stock logistics, there will not be many GWML▸ DMU▸ 's operating west of Slough so getting the Greenford Unit back to Reading will be a challenge, were as for Chiltern Wimberley is not far away
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
devonexpress
|
|
« Reply #102 on: December 01, 2017, 11:23:42 » |
|
I can also reveal they have plans to transfer the Greenford Branch to Chiltern Railways(heaven knows why its always been a Western railway route) I can for pure rolling stock logistics, there will not be many GWML▸ DMU▸ 's operating west of Slough so getting the Greenford Unit back to Reading will be a challenge, were as for Chiltern Wimberley is not far away True, but then it can always run as a stopping service, or if not just run fast down the mainline. The other option of course is to look at a battery operated railcar, as in the consultation there was proposals for battery or hydrogen trains to run on certain routes.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #103 on: December 01, 2017, 11:36:07 » |
|
the Bristol - Salisbury - Southampton - Brighton route is to be split up, with the new GW▸ franchise to serve Bristol to Salisbury - Southampton, and Southampton to Brighton being taken over my TSGN and run by 377's. Which is actually not a bad idea as it allows GWR▸ to utilise more 158's elsewhere.
This should really have been done in 2009? when Southern actually commenced their 7 day hourly service between Brighton and Southampton. It had been proposed in earlier consultations too, but apparently there have always been objections. (I hoped the consultation isn't suggesting Southern run an additional and 'off-pattern' service a couple of times a day, but surprisingly it does seem to be written this way. All a bit odd really...)It doesn't free up much stock though, there isn't even one train's worth east of Southampton over the course of day, only a few hours taken for a couple of arrivals and departures from Brighton, the first of which only comes from Portsmouth. Paul
|
|
« Last Edit: December 01, 2017, 17:04:32 by paul7755 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #104 on: December 01, 2017, 11:44:32 » |
|
It doesn't free up much stock though, there isn't even one train's worth east of Southampton over the course of day, only a few hours taken for a couple of arrivals and departures from Brighton, the first of which only comes from Portsmouth.
South of Westbury, it's a unit until 11:39 and from 13:32 to 19:39. There are at least 2 other services per hour south of Salisbury ... fly in the ointment is the awful connections between GWR▸ (Cardiff) and Southern (Southampton to Brighton) services. More anon ... and I'll move this to the looking forward thread.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
|