Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Bristol Parkway
21:28 Weymouth to Frome
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 22:00:04 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[189] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[101] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[64] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[49] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[42] senior railcard
[40] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
Author Topic: SDO - seems bad.  (Read 17741 times)
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« on: February 18, 2008, 18:36:11 »

At Worcester F S today, I saw 2 FGW (First Great Western) HSTs (High Speed Train). One for London, the other for Malvern in Platform 1. I saw guards operate SDO (Selective Door Opening) on HSTs (first time for me). NB both were 2+8.

Oh dear- dwell times in the station were about 5 mins both times! Here are the problems I saw.

London Bound Train:
*Guard operated SDO too far forward, so 2 sets of doors were on the edge of the platform. This might have been a precaution in case the driver stopped short (a few feet would have put both doors of the platform), but it resulted in people trying to board from locked doors. Of course, people have no idea about HSTs/SDO, so you can't blame them.
*These doors, after they were tried (unsuccessfully), however, were open slightly- the guard had to come down and press them shut before retuning to the panel- this wasted time.
*It took ages for the LM (London Midland - recent franchise) despatch staff to properly dispatch the train- have LM been trained for HSTs?
*Of course, the platform curves the wrong way, so a 180 always took 3 mins; but this HST took 4-5mins. Timetabled time about 2-3 mins at max. The train was already late- it left later!

Malvern Bound Train
*This train took 5+ mins to despatch. Timetabled 2-3 mins.
*To be fair, someone alighted just as the guard was about to lock up. He slammed the door- pretty hard (it seemed to me). However, it was not shut properly. The FGW guard shouted (he was stressed!) and a LM despatch staff ran up and kicked the door shut. The point is- the doors seem to be pretty hard to slam, especially for people used to automatic doors! This wastes time.
*The LM staff took along time as well.
*The train arrived late. It left later.
*The driver did not "rev" the engine fully until the rear car had passed the station. Are not the drivers allowed to rev fully when in a delay?

Overall
*Both guards looked tired, stressed, fed up and angry. The Lon bound one shouted at people trying to board on the locked doors. THe Malvern one went mad when that person leapt off without shutting the door fully. NB- the door looked shut! it wasn't. Has SDO been bad for Guards' health?
*Dwell times were bad- yes ok, the short platform, the curve the wrong way adds to this.
*Basically, it looked like an awkward system to operate, esp for trains trying to catch up time!

In conclusion, from this experience, I cannot see SDO being viable, especially at awkward stations like Worcs F S.

I commend FGW getting more seats, better carriages with less noise etc, but was this a good move for the Cotswold Line- a line where punctuality is even more important?

What do others make of my findings? Was it just a one off? Please reply.

PS- why do guards have to lock doors from the same panel as they opened them (with SDO)? Moving to the middle would have helped both guards, the LM staff, and made the dwell time shorter.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2008, 19:08:53 by Btline » Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2008, 18:42:56 »

They don't have to use the same panel if they use 'SDO (Selective Door Opening) Hold' I *think*
Logged
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2008, 18:53:41 »

They don't have to use the same panel if they use 'SDO (Selective Door Opening) Hold' I *think*
I pretty sure they don't but I don't think they are meant to.
They do it in Cornwall alot with unstaffed stations. They check all the doors and lock further up but as far as I can work out they have to turn the key to Train Doors and then lock which seems to breifly unlock doors locked by SDO. They can definatly take the key out though.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2008, 18:55:16 by qprrule » Logged
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2061



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2008, 18:54:34 »

'Scuse my ignorance, but what's SCO, please? (as per the title)
Logged
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2008, 18:55:03 »

'Scuse my ignorance, but what's SCO, please? (as per the title)
Think he means SDO (Selective Door Opening).
Logged
Ollie
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2308


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2008, 18:55:45 »

Either that or Selective Coach/Carriage Opening Cheesy
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2008, 18:56:02 »

'Scuse my ignorance, but what's SCO, please? (as per the title)
Think he means SDO (Selective Door Opening).

Corrected- not sure how I put a C instead of a D  Huh

« Last Edit: February 18, 2008, 18:57:46 by Btline » Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2008, 18:56:46 »

What do people think about the long term viability?

Are the scenes I talk about above rare?
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2008, 19:04:38 »

I've never seen any problem, perhaps you Cotswold people are simply not used to HSTs (High Speed Train)!
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2008, 19:07:42 »

I've never seen any problem, perhaps you Cotswold people are simply not used to HSTs (High Speed Train)!

That's definitely one problem. But cutting this out, the dwell time was too long!

And remember, I rather an HST than a Thames Turbo- even if a Thames Turbo keeps to time better!
Logged
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2061



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2008, 19:08:45 »

Thanks for the clarification - dam*it, I should have worked that out for myself!

I have to say, in my experience the above incidents are comparatively rare - though I have seen a couple of hiccups at Pewsey (which has short platforms)
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2008, 19:13:16 »

I hate to think what the delay would have been had someone had a bike. I think the the Malvern bound guard would have blown his top off!

He would have had to walk all the way down to the front power car, load the bike, and then walk back, adding at least 2 more mins on!

Luckily, the Malvern guard had the buffet/customer host to lock the doors on the panel, so the guard could walk a few yards down the platform! This might have helped with the bike loadings.
Logged
Ollie
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2308


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2008, 19:35:20 »

From what I know buffet staff should not do anything in relation to dispatch.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2008, 19:43:39 »

From what I know buffet staff should not do anything in relation to dispatch.

Well, she (the customer host or buffet host) locked the doors for the guard! I think he was passed caring about rules! I assumed that he had just about had enough of SDO (Selective Door Opening)!

Or it could have been a ticket inspector? Are they allowed to dispatch?
Logged
Ollie
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2308


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2008, 19:48:10 »

It is possible there were two TM(resolve)'s on the service.
With the introduction of HST (High Speed Train)'s on the cotswold line it has been common place with Senior Conductors learning HST's. That might be the case in this situation.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page